#1Cathedral Village
Saskatchewan · 7,311 peopleOverall C+·#1,731 of 2,556
Strongest: walkability A+, health B+·lowest: cost of living C−
Cathedral Village, #1 on this list · Photo: Daniel Paquet from Regina, Canada (CC BY-SA 2.0)Saskatchewan · 2026
Most bilingual towns in Saskatchewan
Last comes La Loche, at 0.8%. Nationally, Cathedral Village ranks #924 of 2,589. Not one of Saskatchewan’s places reaches the top 100 for all of Canada. Nowhere in Saskatchewan does better on this list than Cathedral Village, at 11.4%. Haultain is second (11.2%) and Lakeview third (11.0%). The middle of the list is Edenwold No. 158, with 5.4%.
Share of residents who can hold a conversation in both English and French, 2021 census How grades work
#111.4% English and French
#2Haultain
Saskatchewan · 6,126 peopleOverall B−·#1,395 of 2,556
Strongest: walkability A+, hazard risk A·lowest: cost of living D
#3Lakeview
Saskatchewan · 7,770 peopleOverall B+·#631 of 2,556
Strongest: jobs & income A+, walkability A·lowest: safety C−
All 104, ranked in Saskatchewan
Best first in Saskatchewan; beside each place, its rank on the same list for all of Canada.
104 places
#TownEnglish and FrenchCanada rankWhat drives it
1Cathedral Village7,311 people11.4%#924 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A+, health B+·lowest: cost of living C−
2Haultain6,126 people11.2%#932 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A+, hazard risk A·lowest: cost of living D
4Buena Vista5,777 people11.0%#941 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A+, jobs & income A+·lowest: cost of living D
5Prince Albert No. 4613,589 people10.3%#987 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A, cost of living B+·lowest: safety D−
6City Park3,827 people9.9%#1,018 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A+, hazard risk A·lowest: cost of living D−
7Central Business District4,987 people9.5%#1,047 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A+, hazard risk A·lowest: cost of living D−
8Buckland No. 4913,550 people9.1%#1,081 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A, cost of living B+·lowest: safety D−
9Whitmore Park6,603 people8.9%#1,098 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, health B+·lowest: safety C−
10Brevoort Park3,485 people8.5%#1,153 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A+, hazard risk A·lowest: cost of living D
11Grosvenor Park6,240 people8.5%#1,157 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A+, hazard risk A·lowest: cost of living D−
12Eastview7,536 people8.2%#1,191 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A, jobs & income B+·lowest: cost of living D
13Silverwood Heights8,153 people8.0%#1,211 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, hazard risk A·lowest: safety C−
15North Park5,000 people7.9%#1,226 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A, walkability A−·lowest: cost of living D
16Lawson Heights8,158 people7.8%#1,240 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, hazard risk A·lowest: safety C−
17Hillcrest Management Area3,004 people7.7%#1,254 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A, hazard risk A·lowest: walkability D
19Caswell Hill2,573 people7.5%#1,294 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A, walkability A·lowest: safety C−
20Hillsdale6,792 people7.5%#1,297 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A, health B+·lowest: cost of living D
21Arcola East33,823 people7.4%#1,308 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, cost of living B+·lowest: safety C−
22Adelaide/Churchill2,652 people7.3%#1,326 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, hazard risk A·lowest: safety C−
23Downtown4,282 people7.3%#1,340 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A+, health B+·lowest: cost of living D
24Brighton7,238 people7.2%#1,351 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, hazard risk A·lowest: safety C−
25Prince Albert40,728 people7.2%#1,361 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A+, walkability B·lowest: safety D−
26La Ronge2,668 people7.2%#1,363 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A−, jobs & income A−·lowest: hazard risk D−
27Greystone Heights6,402 people7.1%#1,371 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A+, jobs & income A·lowest: safety C−
28Willowgrove9,787 people6.9%#1,409 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A, hazard risk A·lowest: safety C−
29Stonebridge15,230 people6.9%#1,415 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, hazard risk A·lowest: safety C−
30Twin Lakes7,286 people6.8%#1,423 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, cost of living B+·lowest: safety C−
31Evergreen16,088 people6.6%#1,474 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, hazard risk A·lowest: safety C−
33Harbour Landing14,402 people6.4%#1,520 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, health B·lowest: safety C−
35University5,888 people6.3%#1,555 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A, walkability A−·lowest: cost of living D
36Dewdney Place3,021 people6.3%#1,563 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A+, health B+·lowest: cost of living D
37Holliston2,963 people6.2%#1,574 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A, jobs & income A·lowest: safety C−
38White City4,379 people6.1%#1,595 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, cost of living A−·lowest: walkability C
39Lakewood Urban Centre4,923 people6.1%#1,601 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A, jobs & income A·lowest: safety C−
40Prairie View8,517 people6.1%#1,607 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, cost of living A−·lowest: safety C−
41Nutana Park3,045 people6.1%#1,610 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A, jobs & income A·lowest: safety C−
43Albert Park12,967 people6.0%#1,631 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A+, jobs & income A−·lowest: cost of living C−
44South West Industrial5,297 people6.0%#1,634 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A, health B+·lowest: safety C−
45North Battleford14,882 people6.0%#1,641 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A−, walkability A−·lowest: safety D−
46Rosewood8,427 people5.9%#1,667 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A, hazard risk A·lowest: safety C−
47Hampton Village9,119 people5.8%#1,684 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, hazard risk A·lowest: safety C−
48Battleford4,657 people5.8%#1,696 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, hazard risk A−·lowest: safety D−
49Westmount2,872 people5.8%#1,701 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A, hazard risk A·lowest: cost of living D
51Nutana Urban Centre5,926 people5.6%#1,756 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A, hazard risk A·lowest: cost of living D
52Walsh Acres/Lakeridge/Garden Ridge9,325 people5.5%#1,770 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, cost of living A·lowest: safety C−
53Edenwold No. 1584,932 people5.4%#1,791 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, safety B+·lowest: walkability C
54Moose Jaw36,337 people5.4%#1,803 of 2,589Strongest: walkability B+, hazard risk B·lowest: safety C−
55Lakewood14,880 people5.4%#1,807 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A, walkability A−·lowest: cost of living D
56Normanview West2,866 people5.3%#1,832 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A, walkability B+·lowest: safety C−
57Normanview Residents Group3,916 people5.2%#1,858 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A, health B+·lowest: safety C−
58Corman Park No. 34410,463 people5.0%#1,912 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A, hazard risk A·lowest: walkability C−
59Argyle North9,971 people5.0%#1,919 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A, health B+·lowest: safety C−
60Heritage5,172 people5.0%#1,932 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A+, health B+·lowest: cost of living D
61University Heights Urban Centre9,247 people4.9%#1,962 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A, health B+·lowest: safety C−
62Meadowgreen3,782 people4.9%#1,970 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A, walkability A·lowest: cost of living D
63Blairmore Suburban Centre7,411 people4.7%#2,025 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A, jobs & income A−·lowest: safety C−
64Lawson Heights Urban Centre3,622 people4.7%#2,029 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A, walkability A·lowest: cost of living D
65Pleasant Hill6,088 people4.7%#2,033 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A+, hazard risk A·lowest: cost of living D
66Dundonald2,855 people4.6%#2,037 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, hazard risk A·lowest: safety C−
67Pacific Heights3,770 people4.6%#2,051 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A, health B+·lowest: safety C−
68Swift Current18,154 people4.5%#2,076 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A, health B·lowest: safety C−
69Confederation Park5,771 people4.5%#2,077 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A, hazard risk A·lowest: safety C−
70Mount Royal5,292 people4.4%#2,128 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A, walkability A·lowest: cost of living D
71Rosemont/Mount Royal10,497 people4.3%#2,157 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income B+, health B+·lowest: safety C−
72Sherwood/McCarthy5,753 people4.2%#2,178 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A, health B·lowest: safety C−
73Fairhaven6,536 people4.1%#2,205 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A, walkability A−·lowest: cost of living D
74North Central9,124 people4.0%#2,240 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A, health B+·lowest: jobs & income D
75Dewdney East18,670 people3.9%#2,258 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A, walkability B+·lowest: safety C−
78Coronation Park7,307 people3.7%#2,320 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A, health B+·lowest: cost of living C−
79Massey Place6,561 people3.7%#2,321 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A, walkability A·lowest: cost of living D
80Westview2,670 people3.6%#2,330 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A, jobs & income A−·lowest: safety C−
81Martensville11,808 people3.4%#2,355 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, hazard risk A·lowest: walkability C+
82Estevan11,391 people3.4%#2,356 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, cost of living A·lowest: health C−
83Vanscoy No. 3453,029 people3.4%#2,358 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A+, jobs & income A−·lowest: walkability C
84Warman14,245 people3.3%#2,373 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, safety A·lowest: walkability B−
85Melville4,547 people3.0%#2,427 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A, cost of living B+·lowest: safety C−
86Northeast9,670 people3.0%#2,432 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A−, health B+·lowest: cost of living D
87Lloydminster (Part)13,137 people2.9%#2,449 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A−, jobs & income A−·lowest: safety D
88Yorkton17,543 people2.9%#2,450 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A−, walkability B+·lowest: safety D
89Esterhazy2,513 people2.8%#2,453 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, cost of living A·lowest: health C−
90Meadow Lake5,667 people2.6%#2,475 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A, hazard risk A−·lowest: safety D−
91Meadow Lake No. 5882,712 people2.5%#2,492 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, hazard risk A−·lowest: walkability D
92Moosomin2,906 people2.3%#2,504 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, cost of living A−·lowest: health C−
93Humboldt6,551 people2.2%#2,510 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A, hazard risk A·lowest: health C−
94Pilot Butte3,255 people2.1%#2,517 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A, cost of living A−·lowest: walkability C
96Weyburn11,871 people1.7%#2,550 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A, walkability B·lowest: health C−
98Rosetown2,600 people1.6%#2,553 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, cost of living A·lowest: hazard risk B
99Kindersley4,740 people1.6%#2,555 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A+, walkability A−·lowest: safety C−
101Melfort6,028 people1.6%#2,558 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A, walkability A−·lowest: safety D
102Rosthern No. 4032,791 people1.5%#2,561 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A+, jobs & income A·lowest: health D−
104La Loche3,124 people0.8%#2,584 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A, cost of living A−·lowest: hazard risk D−
Rankings
More lists for Saskatchewan
All listsBest places to liveBest small townsMost affordableSafestHealthiestJobs & incomeMost walkableLowest hazard riskCivic lifeHighest incomesFastest-growingMost historicMost bilingualYoungestOldestMildest wintersColdest wintersWarmest summersCoolest summersFewest frostsLeast snowSnowiestDriestWettest
Province by province
Most bilingual elsewhere
Photos: Cathedral Village, Daniel Paquet from Regina, Canada (CC BY-SA 2.0) · Haultain, daryl_mitchell from Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada (CC BY-SA 2.0) · Lakeview, Masalai (Public domain), via Wikimedia Commons.
Sources: TownRatings grades: our own summary of the data, ranking Canadian towns against each other only, run #73 of 10 November 2026. Under the Statistics Canada Open Licence.
Adapted from Statistics Canada (Census of Population 2021, population estimates 2025, 2021 census boundaries) under the Statistics Canada Open Licence; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood names in some cities © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).