Home › Canada › Saskatchewan › Rankings › Most walkable Downtown, #1 on this list · Photo: Ccyyrree (CC0) Saskatchewan · 2026 Most walkable towns in Saskatchewan Bottom of the list: Hillcrest Management Area, with D. On the national list, Downtown is #132 of 2,589. The national top 100 holds no place from Saskatchewan. Leading Saskatchewan on this list is Downtown, at A+. The places after the leader belong to Central Business District (A+) and Heritage (A+). 47 of the 104 on this list grade in the A range.
Walkability grade: residents within 800 metres of a pharmacy, and commuters who walk, cycle or take transit How grades work
#1 Saskatchewan · 4,282 people A+ WalkabilityOverall C− · #2,290 of 2,556
Strongest: walkability A+ , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D
#2 Saskatchewan · 4,987 people A+ WalkabilityOverall C− · #2,119 of 2,556
Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D−
#3 Saskatchewan · 5,172 people A+ WalkabilityOverall C− · #2,298 of 2,556
Strongest: walkability A+ , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D
All 104, ranked in Saskatchewan Best first in Saskatchewan; beside each place, its rank on the same list for all of Canada.
Every Saskatchewan list # Town Walkability Canada rank What drives it
1 Downtown 4,282 people A+ #132 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 3 Heritage 5,172 people A+ #286 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 4 Grosvenor Park 6,240 people A+ #372 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D− 5 Albert Park 12,967 people A+ #407 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , jobs & income A− · lowest: cost of living C− 6 Brevoort Park 3,485 people A+ #419 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D 7 Cathedral Village 7,311 people A+ #447 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health B+ · lowest: cost of living C− 8 Pleasant Hill 6,088 people A+ #453 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D 9 Haultain 6,126 people A+ #498 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D 10 City Park 3,827 people A+ #529 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D− 11 Dewdney Place 3,021 people A+ #545 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 12 Buena Vista 5,777 people A+ #555 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , jobs & income A+ · lowest: cost of living D 13 Greystone Heights 6,402 people A+ #673 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 14 Hillsdale 6,792 people A #708 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 15 Holliston 2,963 people A #774 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 16 Melville 4,547 people A #791 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 17 Outlook 2,629 people A #812 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , safety A− · lowest: hazard risk B 18 North Central 9,124 people A #842 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , health B+ · lowest: jobs & income D 19 La Loche 3,124 people A #849 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , cost of living A− · lowest: hazard risk D− 20 Westmount 2,872 people A #862 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D 21 Nutana Urban Centre 5,926 people A #868 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D 22 Mayfair 2,927 people A #876 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 23 Humboldt 6,551 people A #877 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: health C− 24 Al Ritchie 8,087 people A #882 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 25 Unity 2,543 people A #908 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 27 Caswell Hill 2,573 people A #947 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 28 Massey Place 6,561 people A #974 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 29 Meadowgreen 3,782 people A #1,023 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 30 Mount Royal 5,292 people A #1,036 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 31 Coronation Park 7,307 people A #1,067 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , health B+ · lowest: cost of living C− 32 Meadow Lake 5,667 people A #1,076 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk A− · lowest: safety D− 33 Lakeview 7,770 people A #1,105 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 34 Melfort 6,028 people A− #1,154 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability A− · lowest: safety D 35 North Park 5,000 people A− #1,172 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 36 Rosetown 2,600 people A− #1,189 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A · lowest: hazard risk B 37 Adelaide/Churchill 2,652 people A− #1,213 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 38 La Ronge 2,668 people A− #1,222 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A− , jobs & income A− · lowest: hazard risk D− 39 Northeast 9,670 people A− #1,243 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A− , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 40 Avalon 9,488 people A− #1,256 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 41 Lakewood 14,880 people A− #1,265 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 42 North Battleford 14,882 people A− #1,280 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A− , walkability A− · lowest: safety D− 43 Nipawin 5,033 people A− #1,292 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A− , hazard risk B+ · lowest: safety D 44 Moosomin 2,906 people A− #1,297 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A− · lowest: health C− 45 University 5,888 people A− #1,372 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 46 Kindersley 4,740 people A− #1,392 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 47 Fairhaven 6,536 people A− #1,397 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 48 Moose Jaw 36,337 people B+ #1,524 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability B+ , hazard risk B · lowest: safety C− 49 Dewdney East 18,670 people B+ #1,544 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 50 Normanview West 2,866 people B+ #1,562 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 52 Pacific Heights 3,770 people B+ #1,586 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 53 Lawson Heights 8,158 people B+ #1,589 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 54 South West Industrial 5,297 people B+ #1,593 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 55 Nutana Park 3,045 people B+ #1,599 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 57 Yorkton 17,543 people B+ #1,637 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A− , walkability B+ · lowest: safety D 58 Esterhazy 2,513 people B+ #1,651 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A · lowest: health C− 59 Hampton Village 9,119 people B+ #1,659 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 60 Whitmore Park 6,603 people B+ #1,660 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 61 Tisdale 3,052 people B #1,695 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk B+ · lowest: safety D 62 Confederation Park 5,771 people B #1,702 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 63 Rosewood 8,427 people B #1,703 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 64 Argyle North 9,971 people B #1,709 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 65 Westview 2,670 people B #1,711 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety C− 66 Prince Albert 40,728 people B #1,713 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B · lowest: safety D− 67 Estevan 11,391 people B #1,715 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A · lowest: health C− 68 Weyburn 11,871 people B #1,717 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability B · lowest: health C− 70 Stonebridge 15,230 people B #1,749 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 71 Lakewood Urban Centre 4,923 people B #1,784 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 72 Swift Current 18,154 people B #1,794 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , health B · lowest: safety C− 73 Parkridge 4,518 people B #1,808 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 74 McNab 2,510 people B #1,817 of 2,589 Strongest: health B+ , walkability B · lowest: cost of living D 75 Regent Park 2,876 people B #1,828 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 76 Harbour Landing 14,402 people B #1,854 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health B · lowest: safety C− 77 Dundonald 2,855 people B− #1,890 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 78 Willowgrove 9,787 people B− #1,897 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 79 Arcola East 33,823 people B− #1,919 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 80 Sherwood/McCarthy 5,753 people B− #1,935 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , health B · lowest: safety C− 81 Warman 14,245 people B− #1,938 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , safety A · lowest: walkability B− 82 Eastview 7,536 people B− #1,950 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income B+ · lowest: cost of living D 83 Boothill 2,613 people B− #1,954 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 84 Twin Lakes 7,286 people B− #1,960 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 85 Rosemont/Mount Royal 10,497 people B− #1,962 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income B+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 86 Evergreen 16,088 people B− #1,987 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 87 Battleford 4,657 people C+ #2,055 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A− · lowest: safety D− 88 Brighton 7,238 people C+ #2,084 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 89 Martensville 11,808 people C+ #2,087 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: walkability C+ 91 Silverwood Heights 8,153 people C+ #2,128 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 92 Lloydminster (Part) 13,137 people C+ #2,136 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A− , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety D 93 White City 4,379 people C #2,197 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A− · lowest: walkability C 94 Edenwold No. 158 4,932 people C #2,204 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , safety B+ · lowest: walkability C 95 Uplands 5,273 people C #2,207 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 96 Pilot Butte 3,255 people C #2,223 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , cost of living A− · lowest: walkability C 97 Vanscoy No. 345 3,029 people C #2,325 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A− · lowest: walkability C 98 Rosthern No. 403 2,791 people C− #2,387 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: health D− 99 Prairie View 8,517 people C− #2,390 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A− · lowest: safety C− 100 Corman Park No. 344 10,463 people C− #2,427 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: walkability C− 101 Prince Albert No. 461 3,589 people D #2,555 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety D− 102 Meadow Lake No. 588 2,712 people D #2,562 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A− · lowest: walkability D 103 Buckland No. 491 3,550 people D #2,571 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety D− Rankings
More lists for Saskatchewan Province by province
Most walkable elsewhere Photos: Downtown, Ccyyrree (CC0 ) · Central Business District, daryl_mitchell from Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada (CC BY-SA 2.0 ) · Heritage, Quintin Soloviev (CC BY 4.0 ), via Wikimedia Commons.
Sources: TownRatings grades: our own summary of the data, ranking Canadian towns against each other only, run #73 of 10 November 2026. Under the Statistics Canada Open Licence.
Adapted from Statistics Canada (Census of Population 2021, population estimates 2025, 2021 census boundaries) under the Statistics Canada Open Licence; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood names in some cities © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).