Home › Canada › New Brunswick › Rankings › Most bilingual Bouctouche, #1 on this list · Photo: Quintin Soloviev (CC BY 4.0) New Brunswick · 2026 Most bilingual towns in New Brunswick Leading New Brunswick on this list is Bouctouche, at 81.2%. The places after the leader belong to Wellington (79.7%) and Cocagne (79.1%). Halfway down the list sits Oromocto, at 25.3%. At the other end is Grand Manan, with 4.9%. Across Canada, the same list puts Bouctouche #1 of 2,589. Canada’s top 100 on this list includes 13 places in New Brunswick.
Share of residents who can hold a conversation in both English and French, 2021 census How grades work
#1 New Brunswick · 2,678 people 81.2% English and French Overall D · #2,440 of 2,556
Strongest: walkability B− , health C+ · lowest: hazard risk C−
#2 New Brunswick · 3,458 people 79.7% English and French Overall A− · #514 of 2,556
Strongest: cost of living A+ , safety A · lowest: walkability D
#3 New Brunswick · 2,982 people 79.1% English and French Overall B · #926 of 2,556
Strongest: safety A , cost of living B · lowest: hazard risk C−
All 60, ranked in New Brunswick Best first in New Brunswick; beside each place, its rank on the same list for all of Canada.
Every New Brunswick list # Town English and French Canada rank What drives it
3 Cocagne 2,982 people 79.1% #3 of 2,589 Strongest: safety A , cost of living B · lowest: hazard risk C− 7 Dundas 4,733 people 75.8% #9 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living A− , safety C+ · lowest: walkability D 8 Cap-Pelé 3,092 people 75.6% #11 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income B , cost of living C+ · lowest: hazard risk C− 10 Shediac 9,849 people 71.5% #39 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability B+ , jobs & income C+ · lowest: cost of living C− 11 Dieppe 35,986 people 70.5% #45 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability B− · lowest: safety C− 13 Shediac 5,699 people 63.8% #94 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income B+ , cost of living B · lowest: hazard risk C− 14 Edmundston 18,174 people 62.6% #104 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability B , cost of living B− · lowest: hazard risk D 15 Bathurst 4,840 people 62.5% #107 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living B+ , jobs & income B− · lowest: walkability D 16 Dalhousie 3,255 people 60.3% #133 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A− , cost of living B+ · lowest: health D− 17 Bathurst 13,331 people 60.0% #136 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability B+ , health B− · lowest: hazard risk D 18 Campbellton 7,485 people 58.9% #146 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , cost of living C+ · lowest: safety C− 19 Alnwick 3,767 people 57.8% #159 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living A , walkability C− · lowest: health D− 20 Atholville 3,346 people 57.6% #162 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living A− , walkability C+ · lowest: health D 21 Caraquet 4,572 people 52.6% #218 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability B , jobs & income B− · lowest: hazard risk D 22 Haut-Madawaska 4,098 people 51.5% #232 of 2,589 Strongest: safety A , cost of living A− · lowest: hazard risk D 23 Tracadie 16,453 people 47.1% #290 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living B , health B− · lowest: hazard risk D− 24 Moncton 12,238 people 45.1% #311 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , cost of living B · lowest: walkability D 25 Shippagan 3,073 people 43.7% #326 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A− , cost of living B · lowest: hazard risk D 26 Moncton 102,378 people 43.6% #328 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , jobs & income B · lowest: hazard risk C− 27 New Maryland 4,455 people 32.1% #461 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A · lowest: hazard risk C− 28 Shippagan 4,721 people 29.8% #498 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living A , health B− · lowest: walkability D− 29 Starlight Village 5,108 people 29.5% #503 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A− · lowest: walkability C− 30 Riverview 22,614 people 29.2% #513 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 31 Oromocto 9,451 people 25.3% #578 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living B− · lowest: hazard risk D 32 New Maryland 3,198 people 25.2% #580 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , cost of living A− · lowest: walkability D 33 Fredericton 74,655 people 24.3% #602 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , jobs & income A− · lowest: hazard risk C− 34 Coverdale 5,167 people 24.2% #605 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income B− , cost of living B− · lowest: walkability D 35 Kingsclear 3,158 people 23.9% #611 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living A− , jobs & income B+ · lowest: walkability D 36 Quispamsis 20,240 people 22.5% #625 of 2,589 Strongest: safety A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: health D 37 Sackville 6,572 people 21.9% #637 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , health B− · lowest: hazard risk C 38 Saint Marys 5,701 people 20.8% #654 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income B+ , cost of living B · lowest: walkability D 39 Rothesay 12,626 people 20.7% #655 of 2,589 Strongest: safety A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: health C− 40 Lincoln 8,093 people 19.5% #673 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income B+ , cost of living B · lowest: walkability D 41 Miramichi 19,402 people 19.3% #679 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living B− , walkability B− · lowest: hazard risk D 42 Grand Bay-Westfield 5,202 people 18.9% #686 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living A , jobs & income A− · lowest: health C− 43 Hampton 4,754 people 18.5% #698 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living B , jobs & income B− · lowest: health D 44 Burton 5,424 people 18.2% #703 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living A , jobs & income B · lowest: hazard risk D 45 Salisbury 2,585 people 18.1% #705 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability B+ , jobs & income B− · lowest: hazard risk C− 46 Douglas 6,840 people 17.4% #720 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income B , cost of living B− · lowest: walkability D 47 Hampton 3,268 people 16.4% #748 of 2,589 Strongest: safety A , cost of living B+ · lowest: walkability D 48 Salisbury 3,806 people 15.8% #762 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living B+ , health C · lowest: walkability D 49 Sussex 2,742 people 14.0% #803 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living B− , hazard risk C+ · lowest: walkability C− 50 Saint John 79,371 people 13.6% #818 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk C+ · lowest: health C 51 Kingston 3,577 people 13.1% #844 of 2,589 Strongest: safety A , cost of living B · lowest: health D 52 Sussex 4,994 people 13.0% #848 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk C+ · lowest: jobs & income C− 53 Bright 3,648 people 12.1% #896 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living B− , safety C · lowest: health C− 54 Woodstock 6,260 people 11.8% #910 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability B , jobs & income C+ · lowest: safety D 55 Studholm 3,668 people 11.7% #912 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living A− , hazard risk C+ · lowest: walkability D 56 Simonds 4,263 people 11.6% #916 of 2,589 Strongest: safety A , cost of living B · lowest: walkability D 57 St. Stephen 4,876 people 10.8% #955 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A− , cost of living C+ · lowest: safety D 58 Wakefield 2,749 people 9.4% #1,053 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A− , cost of living B · lowest: hazard risk C− 59 Saint George 2,675 people 7.8% #1,248 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living B , jobs & income C · lowest: walkability D 60 Grand Manan 2,648 people 4.9% #1,963 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , cost of living A− · lowest: safety C− Rankings
More lists for New Brunswick Province by province
Most bilingual elsewhere Photos: Bouctouche, Quintin Soloviev (CC BY 4.0 ) · Wellington, P199 (CC BY-SA 3.0 ) · Cocagne, Phil284 (CC BY-SA 3.0 ), via Wikimedia Commons.
Sources: TownRatings grades: our own summary of the data, ranking Canadian towns against each other only, run #73 of 10 November 2026. Under the Statistics Canada Open Licence.
Adapted from Statistics Canada (Census of Population 2021, population estimates 2025, 2021 census boundaries) under the Statistics Canada Open Licence; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood names in some cities © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).