Home › Canada › Saskatchewan › Rankings › Driest Kindersley, #1 on this list · Photo: Ktownsk (Public domain) Saskatchewan · 2026 Driest towns in Saskatchewan Rosetown takes second place with 338 mm; Warman is third with 357 mm. At the halfway mark stands North Battleford, at 383 mm. Last comes Moosomin, at 517 mm. Nationally, Kindersley ranks #17 of 2,589. 53 places in Saskatchewan reach the top 100 for all of Canada. Nowhere in Saskatchewan does better on this list than Kindersley, at 335 mm.
Rain and snow a year (total precipitation), 1991–2020 normals How grades work
#1 Saskatchewan · 4,740 people 335 mm Precipitation a year Overall A− · #554 of 2,556
Strongest: jobs & income A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C−
#2 Saskatchewan · 2,600 people 338 mm Precipitation a year Overall A+ · #31 of 2,556
Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A · lowest: hazard risk B
#3 Saskatchewan · 14,245 people 357 mm Precipitation a year Overall A+ · #43 of 2,556
Strongest: jobs & income A+ , safety A · lowest: walkability B−
All 104, ranked in Saskatchewan Best first in Saskatchewan; beside each place, its rank on the same list for all of Canada.
Every Saskatchewan list # Town Precipitation a year Canada rank What drives it
2 Rosetown 2,600 people 338 mm #18 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A · lowest: hazard risk B 3 Warman 14,245 people 357 mm #30 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , safety A · lowest: walkability B− 22 Westview 2,670 people 357 mm #49 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety C− 24 Avalon 9,488 people 357 mm #51 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 26 Haultain 6,126 people 357 mm #53 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D 33 City Park 3,827 people 357 mm #60 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D− 35 Lakewood 14,880 people 357 mm #62 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 36 Fairhaven 6,536 people 357 mm #63 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 38 Mayfair 2,927 people 357 mm #65 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 41 Eastview 7,536 people 357 mm #68 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income B+ · lowest: cost of living D 43 Westmount 2,872 people 357 mm #70 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D 51 Unity 2,543 people 383 mm #96 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 54 White City 4,379 people 390 mm #114 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A− · lowest: walkability C 55 Pilot Butte 3,255 people 390 mm #115 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , cost of living A− · lowest: walkability C 56 Edenwold No. 158 4,932 people 390 mm #116 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , safety B+ · lowest: walkability C 58 Lakeview 7,770 people 390 mm #118 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 59 Whitmore Park 6,603 people 390 mm #119 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 60 Twin Lakes 7,286 people 390 mm #120 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 61 Arcola East 33,823 people 390 mm #121 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 62 Prairie View 8,517 people 390 mm #122 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A− · lowest: safety C− 63 Uplands 5,273 people 390 mm #123 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 64 Normanview West 2,866 people 390 mm #124 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 65 Dewdney East 18,670 people 390 mm #125 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 66 Boothill 2,613 people 390 mm #126 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 67 Argyle North 9,971 people 390 mm #127 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 68 Sherwood/McCarthy 5,753 people 390 mm #128 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , health B · lowest: safety C− 69 Regent Park 2,876 people 390 mm #129 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 71 Harbour Landing 14,402 people 390 mm #131 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health B · lowest: safety C− 72 Albert Park 12,967 people 390 mm #132 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , jobs & income A− · lowest: cost of living C− 73 Cathedral Village 7,311 people 390 mm #133 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health B+ · lowest: cost of living C− 74 Rosemont/Mount Royal 10,497 people 390 mm #134 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income B+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 75 Al Ritchie 8,087 people 390 mm #135 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 76 Hillsdale 6,792 people 390 mm #136 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 77 Coronation Park 7,307 people 390 mm #137 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , health B+ · lowest: cost of living C− 78 North Central 9,124 people 390 mm #138 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , health B+ · lowest: jobs & income D 79 Northeast 9,670 people 390 mm #139 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A− , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 80 Downtown 4,282 people 390 mm #140 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 81 Heritage 5,172 people 390 mm #141 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 82 Dewdney Place 3,021 people 390 mm #142 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 83 McNab 2,510 people 390 mm #143 of 2,589 Strongest: health B+ , walkability B · lowest: cost of living D 84 Swift Current 18,154 people 394 mm #144 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , health B · lowest: safety C− 85 Tisdale 3,052 people 397 mm #145 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk B+ · lowest: safety D 86 Melfort 6,028 people 397 mm #146 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability A− · lowest: safety D 87 Meadow Lake 5,667 people 407 mm #148 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk A− · lowest: safety D− 88 Meadow Lake No. 588 2,712 people 407 mm #149 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A− · lowest: walkability D 89 Humboldt 6,551 people 417 mm #156 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: health C− 90 Outlook 2,629 people 418 mm #157 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , safety A− · lowest: hazard risk B 91 Moose Jaw 36,337 people 422 mm #165 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability B+ , hazard risk B · lowest: safety C− 92 Nipawin 5,033 people 424 mm #346 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A− , hazard risk B+ · lowest: safety D 93 Lloydminster (Part) 13,137 people 424 mm #349 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A− , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety D 94 Buckland No. 491 3,550 people 432 mm #357 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety D− 95 Prince Albert 40,728 people 432 mm #358 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B · lowest: safety D− 96 Prince Albert No. 461 3,589 people 432 mm #359 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety D− 97 Melville 4,547 people 448 mm #565 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 98 Yorkton 17,543 people 448 mm #566 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A− , walkability B+ · lowest: safety D 99 Estevan 11,391 people 455 mm #573 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A · lowest: health C− 100 Weyburn 11,871 people 455 mm #574 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability B · lowest: health C− 101 La Loche 3,124 people 459 mm #578 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , cost of living A− · lowest: hazard risk D− 102 Esterhazy 2,513 people 489 mm #615 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A · lowest: health C− 103 La Ronge 2,668 people 514 mm #647 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A− , jobs & income A− · lowest: hazard risk D− 104 Moosomin 2,906 people 517 mm #651 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A− · lowest: health C− Rankings
More lists for Saskatchewan Province by province
Driest elsewhere Photos: Kindersley, Ktownsk (Public domain ) · Rosetown, Canadian2006 (CC BY-SA 3.0 ) · Warman, Canadian2006 (CC BY-SA 3.0 ), via Wikimedia Commons.
Sources: TownRatings grades: our own summary of the data, ranking Canadian towns against each other only, run #73 of 10 November 2026. Under the Statistics Canada Open Licence.
Adapted from Statistics Canada (Census of Population 2021, population estimates 2025, 2021 census boundaries) under the Statistics Canada Open Licence; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood names in some cities © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).