Home › Canada › Saskatchewan › Rankings › Safest Warman, #1 on this list · Photo: Canadian2006 (CC BY-SA 3.0) Saskatchewan · 2026 Safest towns in Saskatchewan Nowhere in Saskatchewan does better on this list than Warman, at A. Martensville is second (A) and Outlook third (A−). Of the 104 on the list, 3 earn an A. The list ends with La Loche, at D−. Warman is #134 of 2,572 on the list for all of Canada. No place in Saskatchewan makes the national top 100 on this list.
Safety grade: the Crime Severity Index of the police force or detachment, 2023–2025 How grades work
#1 Saskatchewan · 14,245 people A SafetyOverall A+ · #43 of 2,556
Strongest: jobs & income A+ , safety A · lowest: walkability B−
#2 Saskatchewan · 11,808 people A SafetyOverall A+ · #84 of 2,556
Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: walkability C+
#3 Saskatchewan · 2,629 people A− SafetyOverall A+ · #33 of 2,556
Strongest: walkability A , safety A− · lowest: hazard risk B
All 104, ranked in Saskatchewan Best first in Saskatchewan; beside each place, its rank on the same list for all of Canada.
Every Saskatchewan list # Town Safety Canada rank What drives it
1 Warman 14,245 people A #134 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , safety A · lowest: walkability B− 2 Martensville 11,808 people A #297 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: walkability C+ 3 Outlook 2,629 people A− #319 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A , safety A− · lowest: hazard risk B 4 White City 4,379 people B+ #640 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A− · lowest: walkability C 5 Pilot Butte 3,255 people B+ #641 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A , cost of living A− · lowest: walkability C 6 Edenwold No. 158 4,932 people B+ #642 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , safety B+ · lowest: walkability C 7 Rosetown 2,600 people B #703 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A · lowest: hazard risk B 8 Corman Park No. 344 10,463 people B #710 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: walkability C− 9 Vanscoy No. 345 3,029 people B #713 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A− · lowest: walkability C 10 Esterhazy 2,513 people B− #1,018 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A · lowest: health C− 11 Moosomin 2,906 people B− #1,307 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A− · lowest: health C− 12 Humboldt 6,551 people C+ #1,400 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: health C− 13 Weyburn 11,871 people C+ #1,580 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability B · lowest: health C− 14 Kindersley 4,740 people C− #1,836 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 15 Unity 2,543 people C− #1,926 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 16 Rosthern No. 403 2,791 people C− #1,929 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: health D− 17 Estevan 11,391 people C− #1,937 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A · lowest: health C− 19 Lakeview 7,770 people C− #1,953 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 20 Whitmore Park 6,603 people C− #1,954 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 21 Twin Lakes 7,286 people C− #1,955 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 22 Arcola East 33,823 people C− #1,956 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 23 Prairie View 8,517 people C− #1,959 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A− · lowest: safety C− 24 Uplands 5,273 people C− #1,961 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 25 Normanview West 2,866 people C− #1,962 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 26 Dewdney East 18,670 people C− #1,963 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 27 Boothill 2,613 people C− #1,965 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 28 Argyle North 9,971 people C− #1,966 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 29 Sherwood/McCarthy 5,753 people C− #1,967 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A , health B · lowest: safety C− 30 Regent Park 2,876 people C− #1,968 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 32 Harbour Landing 14,402 people C− #1,970 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health B · lowest: safety C− 33 Albert Park 12,967 people C− #1,971 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , jobs & income A− · lowest: cost of living C− 34 Melville 4,547 people C− #1,972 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 35 Cathedral Village 7,311 people C− #1,974 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , health B+ · lowest: cost of living C− 36 Moose Jaw 36,337 people C− #1,975 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability B+ , hazard risk B · lowest: safety C− 37 Rosemont/Mount Royal 10,497 people C− #1,976 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income B+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 38 Al Ritchie 8,087 people C− #1,977 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 39 Hillsdale 6,792 people C− #1,979 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 40 Coronation Park 7,307 people C− #1,980 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A , health B+ · lowest: cost of living C− 41 North Central 9,124 people C− #1,982 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A , health B+ · lowest: jobs & income D 42 Northeast 9,670 people C− #1,983 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A− , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 43 Downtown 4,282 people C− #1,985 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 44 Heritage 5,172 people C− #1,986 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 45 Dewdney Place 3,021 people C− #1,987 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 46 McNab 2,510 people C− #1,988 of 2,572 Strongest: health B+ , walkability B · lowest: cost of living D 47 Swift Current 18,154 people C− #1,996 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A , health B · lowest: safety C− 48 Brighton 7,238 people C− #2,227 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 49 Dundonald 2,855 people C− #2,228 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 50 Hampton Village 9,119 people C− #2,229 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 51 Lakewood Urban Centre 4,923 people C− #2,230 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 52 Adelaide/Churchill 2,652 people C− #2,231 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 53 Silverwood Heights 8,153 people C− #2,233 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 54 Willowgrove 9,787 people C− #2,234 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 55 Holliston 2,963 people C− #2,235 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 57 Nutana Park 3,045 people C− #2,238 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 58 Confederation Park 5,771 people C− #2,239 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 59 Evergreen 16,088 people C− #2,240 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 60 Greystone Heights 6,402 people C− #2,241 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 61 Buena Vista 5,777 people C− #2,242 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , jobs & income A+ · lowest: cost of living D 62 Lawson Heights 8,158 people C− #2,243 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 63 Westview 2,670 people C− #2,244 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety C− 64 Stonebridge 15,230 people C− #2,245 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 65 Avalon 9,488 people C− #2,246 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 66 Rosewood 8,427 people C− #2,247 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 67 Haultain 6,126 people C− #2,249 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D 68 Pacific Heights 3,770 people C− #2,250 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 69 Brevoort Park 3,485 people C− #2,251 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D 70 Parkridge 4,518 people C− #2,252 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 72 Caswell Hill 2,573 people C− #2,254 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 74 City Park 3,827 people C− #2,257 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D− 75 South West Industrial 5,297 people C− #2,258 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 76 Lakewood 14,880 people C− #2,259 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 77 Fairhaven 6,536 people C− #2,260 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 79 Mayfair 2,927 people C− #2,262 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 80 North Park 5,000 people C− #2,263 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 81 Eastview 7,536 people C− #2,264 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income B+ · lowest: cost of living D 82 University 5,888 people C− #2,265 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 83 Westmount 2,872 people C− #2,266 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D 84 Mount Royal 5,292 people C− #2,268 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 86 Massey Place 6,561 people C− #2,271 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 87 Meadowgreen 3,782 people C− #2,272 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 88 Pleasant Hill 6,088 people C− #2,273 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D 89 Nutana Urban Centre 5,926 people C− #2,274 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D 90 Grosvenor Park 6,240 people C− #2,275 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D− 91 Tisdale 3,052 people D #2,282 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk B+ · lowest: safety D 92 Melfort 6,028 people D #2,460 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability A− · lowest: safety D 93 Nipawin 5,033 people D #2,497 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A− , hazard risk B+ · lowest: safety D 94 Yorkton 17,543 people D #2,500 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A− , walkability B+ · lowest: safety D 95 Lloydminster (Part) 13,137 people D #2,514 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A− , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety D 96 Meadow Lake No. 588 2,712 people D #2,515 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A− · lowest: walkability D 97 Prince Albert 40,728 people D− #2,541 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B · lowest: safety D− 98 Battleford 4,657 people D− #2,547 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A− · lowest: safety D− 99 Meadow Lake 5,667 people D− #2,548 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk A− · lowest: safety D− 100 Buckland No. 491 3,550 people D− #2,552 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety D− 101 Prince Albert No. 461 3,589 people D− #2,553 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety D− 102 North Battleford 14,882 people D− #2,566 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A− , walkability A− · lowest: safety D− 103 La Ronge 2,668 people D− #2,568 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A− , jobs & income A− · lowest: hazard risk D− 104 La Loche 3,124 people D− #2,572 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A , cost of living A− · lowest: hazard risk D− Rankings
More lists for Saskatchewan Province by province
Safest elsewhere Photos: Warman, Canadian2006 (CC BY-SA 3.0 ) · Martensville, Canadian2006 (CC BY-SA 3.0 ) · Outlook, Canadian2006 (CC BY-SA 3.0 ), via Wikimedia Commons.
Sources: TownRatings grades: our own summary of the data, ranking Canadian towns against each other only, run #73 of 10 November 2026. Under the Statistics Canada Open Licence.
Adapted from Statistics Canada (Census of Population 2021, population estimates 2025, 2021 census boundaries) under the Statistics Canada Open Licence; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood names in some cities © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).