Home › Canada › Saskatchewan › Rankings › Snowiest La Loche, #1 on this list · Photo: rd laloche (CC BY 2.0) Saskatchewan · 2026 Snowiest towns in Saskatchewan Leading Saskatchewan on this list is La Loche, at 149 cm. The places after the leader belong to La Ronge (146 cm) and Moosomin (142 cm). Halfway down the list sits Martensville, at 91 cm. At the other end is Rosetown, with 66 cm. Across Canada, the same list puts La Loche #1,107 of 2,538. Canada’s top 100 on this list includes no place in Saskatchewan.
Snowfall a year, 1991–2020 normals at the nearest station that measures snow How grades work
#1 Saskatchewan · 3,124 people 149 cm Snowfall a year Overall –
Strongest: walkability A , cost of living A− · lowest: hazard risk D−
#2 Saskatchewan · 2,668 people 146 cm Snowfall a year Overall –
Strongest: walkability A− , jobs & income A− · lowest: hazard risk D−
#3 Saskatchewan · 2,906 people 142 cm Snowfall a year Overall A− · #495 of 2,556
Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A− · lowest: health C−
All 101, ranked in Saskatchewan Best first in Saskatchewan; beside each place, its rank on the same list for all of Canada.
Every Saskatchewan list # Town Snowfall a year Canada rank What drives it
1 La Loche 3,124 people 149 cm #1,107 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , cost of living A− · lowest: hazard risk D− 2 La Ronge 2,668 people 146 cm #1,230 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A− , jobs & income A− · lowest: hazard risk D− 3 Moosomin 2,906 people 142 cm #1,232 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A− · lowest: health C− 4 Tisdale 3,052 people 128 cm #1,519 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk B+ · lowest: safety D 5 Melfort 6,028 people 128 cm #1,520 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability A− · lowest: safety D 6 Nipawin 5,033 people 128 cm #1,521 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A− , hazard risk B+ · lowest: safety D 7 Esterhazy 2,513 people 125 cm #1,709 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A · lowest: health C− 8 Meadow Lake 5,667 people 125 cm #1,710 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk A− · lowest: safety D− 9 Meadow Lake No. 588 2,712 people 125 cm #1,711 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A− · lowest: walkability D 10 Melville 4,547 people 120 cm #1,893 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 11 Yorkton 17,543 people 120 cm #1,894 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A− , walkability B+ · lowest: safety D 12 Estevan 11,391 people 118 cm #1,895 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A · lowest: health C− 13 Weyburn 11,871 people 118 cm #1,896 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability B · lowest: health C− 14 Buckland No. 491 3,550 people 112 cm #2,201 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety D− 15 Prince Albert 40,728 people 112 cm #2,202 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B · lowest: safety D− 16 Prince Albert No. 461 3,589 people 112 cm #2,203 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety D− 17 White City 4,379 people 105 cm #2,225 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A− · lowest: walkability C 18 Pilot Butte 3,255 people 105 cm #2,226 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , cost of living A− · lowest: walkability C 19 Edenwold No. 158 4,932 people 105 cm #2,227 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , safety B+ · lowest: walkability C 21 Lakeview 7,770 people 105 cm #2,229 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 22 Whitmore Park 6,603 people 105 cm #2,232 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 23 Twin Lakes 7,286 people 105 cm #2,233 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 24 Arcola East 33,823 people 105 cm #2,235 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 25 Prairie View 8,517 people 105 cm #2,236 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A− · lowest: safety C− 26 Uplands 5,273 people 105 cm #2,237 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 27 Normanview West 2,866 people 105 cm #2,238 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 28 Dewdney East 18,670 people 105 cm #2,239 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 29 Boothill 2,613 people 105 cm #2,240 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 30 Argyle North 9,971 people 105 cm #2,241 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 31 Sherwood/McCarthy 5,753 people 105 cm #2,242 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , health B · lowest: safety C− 32 Regent Park 2,876 people 105 cm #2,243 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 34 Harbour Landing 14,402 people 105 cm #2,245 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health B · lowest: safety C− 35 Albert Park 12,967 people 105 cm #2,246 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , jobs & income A− · lowest: cost of living C− 36 Cathedral Village 7,311 people 105 cm #2,247 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , health B+ · lowest: cost of living C− 37 Moose Jaw 36,337 people 105 cm #2,248 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability B+ , hazard risk B · lowest: safety C− 38 Rosemont/Mount Royal 10,497 people 105 cm #2,249 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income B+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 39 Al Ritchie 8,087 people 105 cm #2,251 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 40 Hillsdale 6,792 people 105 cm #2,252 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 41 Coronation Park 7,307 people 105 cm #2,253 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , health B+ · lowest: cost of living C− 42 North Central 9,124 people 105 cm #2,254 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , health B+ · lowest: jobs & income D 43 Northeast 9,670 people 105 cm #2,256 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A− , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 44 Downtown 4,282 people 105 cm #2,257 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 45 Heritage 5,172 people 105 cm #2,258 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 46 Dewdney Place 3,021 people 105 cm #2,259 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 47 McNab 2,510 people 105 cm #2,260 of 2,538 Strongest: health B+ , walkability B · lowest: cost of living D 48 Lloydminster (Part) 13,137 people 103 cm #2,263 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A− , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety D 49 Outlook 2,629 people 99 cm #2,274 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , safety A− · lowest: hazard risk B 50 Warman 14,245 people 91 cm #2,293 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , safety A · lowest: walkability B− 51 Martensville 11,808 people 91 cm #2,294 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: walkability C+ 52 Brighton 7,238 people 91 cm #2,295 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 53 Dundonald 2,855 people 91 cm #2,296 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 54 Hampton Village 9,119 people 91 cm #2,297 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 55 Corman Park No. 344 10,463 people 91 cm #2,298 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: walkability C− 56 Lakewood Urban Centre 4,923 people 91 cm #2,299 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 57 Adelaide/Churchill 2,652 people 91 cm #2,300 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 58 Silverwood Heights 8,153 people 91 cm #2,301 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 59 Willowgrove 9,787 people 91 cm #2,302 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 60 Holliston 2,963 people 91 cm #2,303 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 62 Nutana Park 3,045 people 91 cm #2,305 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 63 Confederation Park 5,771 people 91 cm #2,306 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 64 Evergreen 16,088 people 91 cm #2,307 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 65 Vanscoy No. 345 3,029 people 91 cm #2,308 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A− · lowest: walkability C 66 Greystone Heights 6,402 people 91 cm #2,309 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 67 Buena Vista 5,777 people 91 cm #2,310 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , jobs & income A+ · lowest: cost of living D 68 Lawson Heights 8,158 people 91 cm #2,311 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 69 Westview 2,670 people 91 cm #2,312 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety C− 70 Stonebridge 15,230 people 91 cm #2,313 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 71 Avalon 9,488 people 91 cm #2,314 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 72 Rosewood 8,427 people 91 cm #2,315 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 73 Haultain 6,126 people 91 cm #2,316 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D 74 Pacific Heights 3,770 people 91 cm #2,317 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 75 Brevoort Park 3,485 people 91 cm #2,318 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D 76 Parkridge 4,518 people 91 cm #2,319 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 78 Caswell Hill 2,573 people 91 cm #2,321 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 80 City Park 3,827 people 91 cm #2,323 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D− 81 South West Industrial 5,297 people 91 cm #2,324 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 82 Lakewood 14,880 people 91 cm #2,325 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 83 Fairhaven 6,536 people 91 cm #2,326 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 85 Mayfair 2,927 people 91 cm #2,328 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 86 Rosthern No. 403 2,791 people 91 cm #2,329 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: health D− 87 North Park 5,000 people 91 cm #2,330 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 88 Eastview 7,536 people 91 cm #2,331 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income B+ · lowest: cost of living D 89 University 5,888 people 91 cm #2,332 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 90 Westmount 2,872 people 91 cm #2,333 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D 91 Mount Royal 5,292 people 91 cm #2,334 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 92 Central Business District 4,987 people 91 cm #2,335 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D− 93 Massey Place 6,561 people 91 cm #2,336 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 94 Meadowgreen 3,782 people 91 cm #2,337 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 95 Pleasant Hill 6,088 people 91 cm #2,338 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D 96 Nutana Urban Centre 5,926 people 91 cm #2,339 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D 97 Grosvenor Park 6,240 people 91 cm #2,340 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D− 98 Swift Current 18,154 people 88 cm #2,348 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , health B · lowest: safety C− 99 Kindersley 4,740 people 86 cm #2,354 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 100 Humboldt 6,551 people 85 cm #2,362 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: health C− 101 Rosetown 2,600 people 66 cm #2,364 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A · lowest: hazard risk B Rankings
More lists for Saskatchewan Province by province
Snowiest elsewhere Photos: La Loche, rd laloche (CC BY 2.0 ) · La Ronge, Darren Kirby (CC BY-SA 2.0 ) · Moosomin, Andrew Scheer (CC0 ), via Wikimedia Commons.
Sources: TownRatings grades: our own summary of the data, ranking Canadian towns against each other only, run #73 of 10 November 2026. Under the Statistics Canada Open Licence.
Adapted from Statistics Canada (Census of Population 2021, population estimates 2025, 2021 census boundaries) under the Statistics Canada Open Licence; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood names in some cities © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).