Canada
Find your town in Saskatchewan
Since the 2021 census its population is up 13.7%. Its places hold 1.01 million people, on Statistics Canada’s July estimate. Saskatoon alone holds 31% of the population. 2 of its places are cities of 250,000 or more, split into 70 neighbourhoods with pages of their own. There are also 12 First Nations reserves, with a page each. At the top here stands Rosetown, #31 among 2,556 in the country.
102graded towns
202places with a page
Prince Albertlargest · 40,728
Saskatchewan at a glance
What Saskatchewan is like
Against towns across Canada, the median ranked town in Saskatchewan does best on hazard risk and jobs & income and least well on safety. Choose a subject to find the towns that lead on it.
How the towns in Saskatchewan grade overall102 ranked towns
11 of 102 (11%) grade A− or better, against 22% of Canadian towns.
Every town ranked by scoreThe full list for Saskatchewan, with what drives each gradeProvince report cardHow Saskatchewan compares with Canada’s other provinces and territories, subject by subjectCompare two townsSide by side, subject by subjectThe finder
Find a town that’s…
32 towns · ordered by province rank
Cities by neighbourhood
The 2 cities in Saskatchewan graded by neighbourhood
The 70 neighbourhoods ranked here sit on their cities’ pages, each with its grades and its place in the province.
Rankings
Saskatchewan’s lists
Of the 24 lists that rank the places in Saskatchewan, Rosetown leads 3, more than any other.
Every Saskatchewan list24 listsBest places to live102 places · #1 RosetownBest small towns83 places · #1 RosetownMost affordable104 places · #1 EsterhazySafest104 places · #1 WarmanHealthiest102 places · #1 City ParkJobs & income104 places · #1 Adelaide/ChurchillMost walkable104 places · #1 DowntownLowest hazard risk104 places · #1 Prince AlbertCivic life104 places · #1 EsterhazyHighest incomes104 places · #1 White CityDescribed, no lettersFastest-growing28 places · #1 White CityDescribed, no lettersMost historic104 places · #1 BattlefordDescribed, no lettersMost bilingual104 places · #1 Cathedral VillageDescribed, no lettersYoungest104 places · #1 La LocheDescribed, no lettersOldest104 places · #1 Nutana Urban CentreDescribed, no lettersMildest winters104 places · #1 Swift CurrentDescribed, no lettersColdest winters104 places · #1 La RongeDescribed, no lettersWarmest summers104 places · #1 EstevanDescribed, no lettersCoolest summers104 places · #1 La LocheDescribed, no lettersFewest frosts104 places · #1 OutlookDescribed, no lettersLeast snow101 places · #1 RosetownDescribed, no lettersSnowiest101 places · #1 La LocheDescribed, no lettersDriest104 places · #1 KindersleyDescribed, no lettersWettest104 places · #1 MoosominDescribed, no letters
No overall grade
Towns without an overall grade
Each has its page and the subject grades it has; the reason it has no overall grade is beside it.
La Loche3,124 people · No Health Grade.Graded on its page: Safety D−, Cost of living A−, Jobs & income C+, Walkability A, Hazard risk D−La Ronge2,668 people · No Health Grade.Graded on its page: Safety D−, Cost of living A−, Jobs & income A−, Walkability A−, Hazard risk D−Dundurn No. 3142,479 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B, Cost of living B+, Health B−, Jobs & income B−, Walkability C−, Hazard risk A+Assiniboia2,431 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C+, Cost of living A−, Health B+, Jobs & income A, Walkability A+, Hazard risk B−Seekaskootch 1192,361 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Health D, Jobs & income D, Walkability D, Hazard risk A−Maple Creek2,354 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C, Cost of living B+, Health B+, Jobs & income A−, Walkability A, Hazard risk B−Biggar2,337 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C, Cost of living B+, Health B+, Jobs & income B+, Walkability B+, Hazard risk BFort Qu'Appelle2,247 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D, Cost of living C, Health C−, Jobs & income B−, Walkability A, Hazard risk BBlucher No. 3432,239 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B, Cost of living B, Health B−, Jobs & income B+, Walkability D−, Hazard risk ABritannia No. 5022,212 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D, Cost of living B+, Health D, Jobs & income A, Walkability D, Hazard risk A−Indian Head2,201 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B−, Cost of living B, Health C−, Jobs & income A−, Walkability B, Hazard risk C+Canora2,179 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C, Cost of living A−, Health C−, Jobs & income C−, Walkability A, Hazard risk B−Watrous2,154 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B, Cost of living B+, Health C−, Jobs & income A+, Walkability A+, Hazard risk ALumsden No. 1892,150 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B−, Cost of living B, Health B−, Jobs & income A, Walkability D, Hazard risk B−Swift Current No. 1372,089 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B−, Cost of living A−, Health B−, Jobs & income A+, Walkability D, Hazard risk BLumsden2,059 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B−, Cost of living B−, Health B−, Jobs & income A, Walkability A, Hazard risk BBalgonie2,020 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B+, Cost of living A−, Health B−, Jobs & income A, Walkability B+, Hazard risk C+Stanley 1571,999 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Jobs & income D, Walkability A, Hazard risk D−Orkney No. 2441,957 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B, Cost of living B, Health D, Jobs & income A+, Walkability D, Hazard risk B−Shaunavon1,939 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B+, Cost of living A−, Health B+, Jobs & income A, Walkability A, Hazard risk BRosthern1,926 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C−, Cost of living B+, Health C−, Jobs & income B+, Walkability A−, Hazard risk APelican Narrows 184B1,923 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D−, Jobs & income C, Walkability B, Hazard risk B+Mervin No. 4991,920 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D, Cost of living C+, Health D, Jobs & income B, Walkability C+, Hazard risk A−Dalmeny1,900 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety A, Cost of living B, Health B, Jobs & income A+, Walkability C+, Hazard risk ADivision No. 18, Unorganized1,891 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D−, Cost of living B+, Jobs & income C−, Walkability C+, Hazard risk D−Kamsack1,849 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D, Cost of living B, Health C−, Jobs & income C−, Walkability A−, Hazard risk BWynyard1,827 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C+, Cost of living B, Health C−, Jobs & income A−, Walkability A−, Hazard risk A+Langham1,793 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C, Cost of living C+, Health A−, Jobs & income B+, Walkability B+, Hazard risk AShellbrook No. 4931,671 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D−, Cost of living A−, Health D−, Jobs & income A, Walkability D, Hazard risk D−Big River 1181,613 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Health D−, Jobs & income C−, Walkability C−, Hazard risk A+Ahtahkakoop 1041,609 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Health D−, Jobs & income D, Walkability D−, Hazard risk A+Lanigan1,597 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B, Cost of living A, Health C−, Jobs & income A+, Walkability B, Hazard risk AAberdeen No. 3731,585 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C, Cost of living B, Health B−, Jobs & income A, Walkability D−, Hazard risk A+Wilton No. 4721,583 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D, Cost of living B, Health D, Jobs & income A−, Walkability D−, Hazard risk A−Shellbrook1,576 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D−, Cost of living A, Health C−, Jobs & income A, Walkability A−, Hazard risk DCarlyle1,571 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D, Cost of living A−, Health D, Jobs & income A+, Walkability A, Hazard risk BAir Ronge1,515 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D−, Cost of living A+, Jobs & income A, Walkability A−, Hazard risk D−Laird No. 4041,488 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C, Health D−, Jobs & income B+, Walkability C−, Hazard risk A+Île-à-la-Crosse1,484 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D−, Cost of living A+, Jobs & income B+, Walkability A−, Hazard risk D−Osler1,473 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C, Cost of living C+, Health B−, Jobs & income A+, Walkability A−, Hazard risk A+Waldheim1,447 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C−, Cost of living B+, Health D−, Jobs & income C+, Walkability A, Hazard risk ALac La Hache 2201,443 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Jobs & income C+, Walkability A+, Hazard risk D−Beaver River No. 6221,442 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D−, Health D, Jobs & income B−, Walkability D, Hazard risk A−Sherwood No. 1591,431 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B+, Cost of living B−, Health B, Jobs & income B−, Walkability D−, Hazard risk C+Lac La Ronge 1561,415 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Jobs & income C+, Walkability A−, Hazard risk D−Canwood No. 4941,398 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D−, Cost of living B−, Health D−, Jobs & income B−, Walkability D−, Hazard risk ALakeland No. 5211,393 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D−, Health D−, Jobs & income C, Walkability D−, Hazard risk A+Hudson Bay1,391 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C+, Cost of living B+, Health C−, Jobs & income B−, Walkability A+, Hazard risk B+Frenchman Butte No. 5011,382 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D, Health D, Jobs & income C, Walkability C+, Hazard risk A−Beardy's 97 and Okemasis 961,357 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Health D−, Jobs & income D, Walkability C−, Hazard risk A+Regina Beach1,322 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B−, Cost of living C−, Health B+, Jobs & income C, Walkability C, Hazard risk B−Moose Jaw No. 1611,293 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B−, Cost of living C+, Health B, Jobs & income A+, Walkability B+, Hazard risk BEstevan No. 51,293 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C+, Cost of living A−, Health C−, Jobs & income A+, Walkability C, Hazard risk C+Spiritwood No. 4961,291 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D−, Health D−, Jobs & income A−, Walkability B−, Hazard risk A+Oxbow1,290 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B, Cost of living A, Health D−, Jobs & income B+, Walkability B, Hazard risk B+Sturgeon Lake 1011,285 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Health D−, Jobs & income D, Hazard risk A+Wadena1,278 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D, Cost of living B, Health C−, Jobs & income A−, Walkability A−, Hazard risk A+Torch River No. 4881,277 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D, Health D−, Jobs & income B+, Walkability C, Hazard risk D−Wilkie1,261 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C−, Cost of living A+, Health C, Jobs & income A, Walkability B, Hazard risk BSouth Qu'Appelle No. 1571,256 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B+, Health D−, Jobs & income A−, Walkability C−, Hazard risk C+Langenburg1,256 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B−, Cost of living A+, Health D−, Jobs & income A, Walkability A, Hazard risk B−Creighton1,238 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D, Cost of living A+, Jobs & income A, Walkability A−, Hazard risk B+Maidstone1,222 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D, Cost of living B+, Health C, Jobs & income A−, Walkability A+, Hazard risk A−Meota No. 4681,217 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D−, Health D, Jobs & income A, Walkability D−, Hazard risk A−Chicken 2241,210 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Jobs & income C−, Walkability C+, Hazard risk D−Makwa Lake 129B1,203 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Health C, Jobs & income C−, Hazard risk D−Grenfell1,203 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D, Cost of living B+, Health D−, Jobs & income C, Walkability A−, Hazard risk B−Longlaketon No. 2191,192 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C, Health B, Jobs & income B+, Walkability D−, Hazard risk B−Lajord No. 1281,191 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B+, Cost of living C+, Health D−, Jobs & income C+, Walkability C+, Hazard risk CMacklin1,185 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C−, Cost of living A, Health D−, Jobs & income A−, Walkability B+, Hazard risk BMaple Creek No. 1111,179 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C, Cost of living A−, Health B−, Jobs & income C−, Walkability D−, Hazard risk BDavidson1,164 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C, Cost of living B+, Health B+, Jobs & income A+, Walkability A, Hazard risk B−Paddockwood No. 5201,155 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D−, Health D−, Jobs & income C, Walkability C+, Hazard risk AFoam Lake1,154 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D, Cost of living A−, Health D−, Jobs & income C−, Walkability A−, Hazard risk B−Weyburn No. 671,149 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C, Health C−, Jobs & income A+, Walkability C−, Hazard risk CCarnduff1,139 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B, Cost of living A+, Health D−, Jobs & income A, Walkability A+, Hazard risk BHudson Bay No. 3941,116 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C+, Cost of living A−, Health D, Jobs & income B, Walkability D−, Hazard risk B+Birch Hills1,093 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D−, Cost of living A, Health D−, Jobs & income D, Walkability B−, Hazard risk A+Duck Lake No. 4631,092 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D−, Health D−, Jobs & income B+, Walkability D, Hazard risk AKipling1,091 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D, Cost of living A−, Health C−, Jobs & income B+, Walkability A, Hazard risk BSt. Louis No. 4311,080 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C−, Cost of living A, Health D−, Jobs & income B+, Walkability C, Hazard risk A+Battle River No. 4381,080 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D−, Cost of living B+, Health C−, Jobs & income A−, Walkability C−, Hazard risk A−Montreal Lake 1061,069 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Health D−, Jobs & income C−, Hazard risk D−Redvers1,068 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D, Cost of living A, Health D−, Jobs & income B−, Walkability A, Hazard risk BBuffalo Narrows1,064 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D−, Cost of living A, Jobs & income B, Walkability C, Hazard risk D−Pinehouse1,064 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D−, Cost of living A, Jobs & income C+, Walkability B, Hazard risk D−Wakaw1,052 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C−, Cost of living B−, Health C−, Jobs & income D, Walkability B−, Hazard risk A+Moose Range No. 4861,047 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D, Cost of living A+, Health D, Jobs & income A+, Walkability B−, Hazard risk B+Gravelbourg1,047 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B−, Cost of living A+, Health B+, Jobs & income A+, Walkability A, Hazard risk BPreeceville1,046 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C, Cost of living B−, Health C−, Jobs & income C+, Walkability B+, Hazard risk B−North Qu'Appelle No. 1871,044 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D, Health D, Jobs & income B, Walkability C−, Hazard risk B−Preeceville No. 3341,043 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C, Health D, Jobs & income B−, Hazard risk BHumboldt No. 3701,039 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B+, Health C−, Jobs & income A+, Walkability D−, Hazard risk ACandle Lake1,032 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Health D−, Jobs & income A−, Walkability D, Hazard risk DCaronport1,029 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B−, Cost of living B−, Health C+, Jobs & income C+, Walkability A−, Hazard risk B+Kindersley No. 2901,023 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C−, Cost of living A−, Health B−, Jobs & income A+, Walkability C+, Hazard risk BMcKillop No. 2201,023 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety B−, Health D, Jobs & income B+, Walkability C, Hazard risk ABig River No. 5551,008 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D−, Health D−, Jobs & income A, Walkability D−, Hazard risk A+Spiritwood1,005 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety D−, Cost of living A, Health D−, Jobs & income A+, Walkability A, Hazard risk A+Eston1,005 people · under 2,500 residents: subject grades, no overall grade.Graded on its page: Safety C−, Cost of living A, Health B+, Jobs & income A+, Walkability A, Hazard risk B
Next door
Provinces and territories next to Saskatchewan
The provinces and territories that share a border with it: each one’s places, and how many of its towns have an overall grade.
Questions about Saskatchewan
How do the biggest towns in Saskatchewan grade?
Prince Albert grades D overall, with its best grade in hazard risk. Next in size, Moose Jaw grades C+, best in walkability.
How are these towns ranked?
By the overall grade, which blends seven graded subjects (safety, cost of living, schools, health, jobs & income, walkability and hazard risk) from public data, each comparing a town with every town in Canada of 1,000 or more. The rank is among the towns of 2,500 or more in Saskatchewan, where five or more have an overall grade.
How does Saskatchewan compare with the other provinces and territories?
On its report card, which sets figures for the whole province beside how its towns grade, Saskatchewan comes 11th of 13 overall (C−). It does best on jobs & income and worst on walkability.
Is every town in Saskatchewan on TownRatings?
Yes: every one has its page, listed here from the biggest town to the smallest place; size decides only how many grades a page carries.
Why isn’t my town ranked?
The ranking covers towns of 2,500 or more with an overall grade. La Ronge, La Loche, Dundurn No. 314, Assiniboia and 96 more have no overall grade; their pages show the grades they have, and why.
Photos: Rosetown, Canadian2006 (CC BY-SA 3.0) · Outlook, Canadian2006 (CC BY-SA 3.0) · Warman, Canadian2006 (CC BY-SA 3.0) · Martensville, Canadian2006 (CC BY-SA 3.0) · White City, Canadian2006 (CC BY-SA 3.0) · Pilot Butte, Masalai at en.wikipedia (Public domain) · Esterhazy, Kjfmartin (CC BY-SA 3.0) · Edenwold No. 158, RM Communications (CC BY-SA 4.0) · Moosomin, Andrew Scheer (CC0) · Humboldt, Tourismhumboldt (CC BY-SA 3.0) · Kindersley, Ktownsk (Public domain) · Unity, Unknown author Unknown author (Public domain) · Corman Park No. 344, SriMesh (CC BY-SA 3.0) · Estevan, Quintin Soloviev (CC BY 4.0) · Swift Current, Quintin Soloviev (CC BY 4.0) · Vanscoy No. 345, Martin Cathrae from Charlottetown, PE, Canada (CC BY-SA 2.0) · Weyburn, Masterhatch (CC0) · Battleford, Quintin Soloviev (CC BY 4.0) · Meadow Lake, SriMesh (Julia Adamson) (CC BY-SA 3.0) · Tisdale, Unknown author Unknown author (Public domain) · Melville, Voldeg and Bolton (Public domain) · Melfort, simpleinsomnia (CC BY 2.0) · Moose Jaw, Canadian2006 (CC BY-SA 4.0) · Rosthern No. 403, Canadian2006 (CC BY-SA 3.0) · Nipawin, Wtshymanski (Public domain) · North Battleford, Quintin Soloviev (CC BY 4.0) · Lloydminster (Part), Jason Whiting (CC BY-SA 4.0) · Yorkton, SriMesh (CC BY-SA 3.0) · Prince Albert, Padowntown (CC BY-SA 4.0), via Wikimedia Commons.
Sources: TownRatings grades: our own summary of the data, ranking Canadian towns against each other only, run #73 of 10 November 2026 · Statistics Canada, 2021 Census of Population and population estimates. Under the Statistics Canada Open Licence.
Adapted from Statistics Canada (Census of Population 2021, population estimates 2025, 2021 census boundaries) under the Statistics Canada Open Licence; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood names in some cities © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).