Home › Canada › Alberta › Rankings › Most bilingual Bonnie Doon, #1 on this list · Photo: TagaSanPedroAko (CC BY-SA 4.0) Alberta · 2026 Most bilingual towns in Alberta Jasper takes second place with 20.4%; Garrison Woods is third with 19.5%. At the halfway mark stands Central McDougall, at 5.7%. Last comes La Crète, at 0.5%. Nationally, Bonnie Doon ranks #659 of 2,589. Not one of Alberta’s places reaches the top 100 for all of Canada. Nowhere in Alberta does better on this list than Bonnie Doon, at 20.6%.
Share of residents who can hold a conversation in both English and French, 2021 census How grades work
#1 Overall C+ · #1,674 of 2,556
Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D
#2 Overall B · #1,110 of 2,556
Strongest: walkability A+ , schools A · lowest: hazard risk D−
#3 Overall A+ · #52 of 2,556
Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health A+ · lowest: safety B−
All 474, ranked in Alberta Best first in Alberta; beside each place, its rank on the same list for all of Canada.
Every Alberta list # Town English and French Canada rank What drives it
1 Bonnie Doon 6,697 people 20.6% #659 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 2 Jasper 4,627 people 20.4% #662 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , schools A · lowest: hazard risk D− 3 Garrison Woods 3,138 people 19.5% #671 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health A+ · lowest: safety B− 4 Canmore 17,341 people 18.3% #700 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 5 St. Paul 6,218 people 17.7% #714 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A− , hazard risk A− · lowest: safety D− 6 St. Paul County No. 19 6,462 people 17.6% #716 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income B+ · lowest: safety D− 7 Upper Mount Royal 2,758 people 15.6% #766 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: safety B− 8 Holyrood 3,305 people 15.4% #775 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A− · lowest: safety C− 9 Altadore 7,675 people 14.7% #789 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living C+ 10 Elbow Park 4,120 people 14.4% #794 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: safety B− 11 Beaumont 26,305 people 14.3% #798 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , safety A · lowest: health B 12 Laurier Heights 3,048 people 13.8% #809 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: safety C− 13 Ritchie 5,215 people 13.7% #813 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living C− 14 Banff 11,402 people 13.5% #820 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , schools A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 15 Charleswood 5,642 people 13.1% #842 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living C− 16 Richmond 4,811 people 13.0% #845 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living C− 17 West Hillhurst 10,319 people 12.9% #850 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living C− 18 South Calgary 4,412 people 12.9% #851 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 19 Wildwood 4,177 people 12.8% #857 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living C− 20 Strathcona 8,283 people 12.8% #862 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 21 Belgravia 5,478 people 12.7% #865 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 22 Greenfield 3,710 people 12.5% #873 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 23 Hillhurst 8,435 people 12.5% #874 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 24 Riverdale 5,490 people 12.5% #877 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 25 Avonmore 2,971 people 12.2% #888 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 26 Mission 6,329 people 12.1% #892 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 27 Sunnyside 2,976 people 12.1% #894 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 28 Rosedale 2,507 people 12.0% #898 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 29 Cold Lake 17,798 people 12.0% #900 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety D 30 Bonnyville No. 87 13,265 people 12.0% #901 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety D 31 Erlton 3,221 people 11.8% #905 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living C− 32 Forest Heights 4,118 people 11.8% #908 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 33 Peace River 7,220 people 11.7% #911 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A− · lowest: safety D 34 Lac la Biche County 8,580 people 11.7% #913 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income B+ · lowest: safety D− 35 Cougar Ridge 7,101 people 11.6% #914 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , schools A · lowest: safety B− 36 Lower Mount Royal 3,136 people 11.6% #915 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 37 Inglewood 4,380 people 11.4% #921 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 38 Allendale 2,951 people 11.4% #922 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 39 Mount Pleasant 9,224 people 11.3% #925 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 40 Patricia Heights 4,355 people 10.9% #945 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 41 Windsor Park 7,863 people 10.9% #946 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 42 Capitol Hill 6,135 people 10.8% #952 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 43 Lakeview 12,799 people 10.7% #956 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: cost of living C− 44 St. Albert 74,621 people 10.6% #959 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: cost of living B− 45 Brookside 3,173 people 10.6% #960 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 46 Crescent Heights 6,411 people 10.5% #968 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 47 Sunalta 4,151 people 10.5% #969 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 48 Bankview 5,610 people 10.4% #974 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 49 Parkview 5,729 people 10.3% #982 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: safety C− 50 Currie Barracks 7,342 people 10.3% #984 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D− 51 Malmo Plains 4,150 people 10.3% #985 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: safety C− 52 Discovery Ridge 4,256 people 10.2% #989 of 2,589 Strongest: schools A+ , health A · lowest: cost of living C+ 53 Bonnyville 7,366 people 10.2% #993 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A− , walkability A− · lowest: safety D 54 Morinville 10,763 people 10.1% #1,001 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B · lowest: schools D 55 Ramsay Heights 3,434 people 10.0% #1,004 of 2,589 Strongest: schools A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: safety C− 56 Hazeldean 3,247 people 10.0% #1,005 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living C− 57 Beltline 26,171 people 9.9% #1,011 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 58 Varsity 12,605 people 9.9% #1,012 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 59 Sweet Grass 2,616 people 9.9% #1,015 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living C− 60 Silver Springs 9,042 people 9.8% #1,020 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , schools A · lowest: cost of living C− 61 Renfrew 6,685 people 9.8% #1,021 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 62 Westmount 4,961 people 9.8% #1,023 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: cost of living D 63 Wîhkwêntôwin 19,050 people 9.8% #1,025 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 64 Queen Alexandra 5,106 people 9.8% #1,026 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 65 Montgomery 4,456 people 9.7% #1,027 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 66 Downtown 12,880 people 9.7% #1,032 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 67 Glenora 6,197 people 9.6% #1,035 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A+ · lowest: safety C− 68 King Edward Park 8,399 people 9.6% #1,039 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 69 Lake Bonavista 11,154 people 9.5% #1,042 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , jobs & income A · lowest: cost of living C+ 70 Westgate 3,139 people 9.5% #1,043 of 2,589 Strongest: schools A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 71 University Heights 4,031 people 9.4% #1,051 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 72 Ramsay 3,601 people 9.4% #1,052 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 73 Valley Ridge 7,782 people 9.3% #1,055 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , schools A · lowest: walkability D 74 Brentwood 7,369 people 9.2% #1,061 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 75 Ottewell 8,040 people 9.2% #1,064 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C− 76 Killarney/Glengarry 7,935 people 9.1% #1,071 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 77 Cochrane 39,397 people 9.1% #1,072 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , safety A · lowest: cost of living C− 78 Greenview 2,822 people 9.0% #1,084 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 79 Oakridge 5,623 people 8.9% #1,096 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living C− 80 Pleasantview 3,746 people 8.9% #1,104 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 81 Downtown East Village 3,524 people 8.8% #1,106 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 82 Coach Hill 3,383 people 8.7% #1,114 of 2,589 Strongest: schools A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living C− 83 Royal Gardens 3,392 people 8.7% #1,125 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: cost of living D 84 Strathcona Park 8,680 people 8.6% #1,132 of 2,589 Strongest: schools A+ , health A+ · lowest: safety B− 85 Bridgeland/Riverside 6,860 people 8.6% #1,135 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 86 Aspen Woods 9,606 people 8.5% #1,147 of 2,589 Strongest: schools A+ , health A · lowest: jobs & income B− 87 West Springs 11,632 people 8.5% #1,148 of 2,589 Strongest: schools A+ , health A · lowest: safety B− 89 Hinton 10,124 people 8.5% #1,156 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability A− · lowest: safety D 90 Springbank Hill 9,913 people 8.4% #1,159 of 2,589 Strongest: schools A+ , health A · lowest: cost of living B− 91 Eau Claire 3,733 people 8.4% #1,160 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 92 Tuxedo Park 4,082 people 8.3% #1,171 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 93 Scenic Acres 8,026 people 8.2% #1,182 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , schools A · lowest: cost of living B− 94 Spruce Cliff 6,691 people 8.2% #1,185 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 95 South Terwillegar 8,183 people 8.2% #1,186 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 96 Boyle Street 5,862 people 8.2% #1,192 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D− 97 Tuscany 19,986 people 8.1% #1,194 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , schools A · lowest: safety B− 98 Westbrook Estates 2,838 people 8.1% #1,196 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 99 Trumpeter Area 5,220 people 8.1% #1,200 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A+ · lowest: walkability D 100 Magrath Heights 3,728 people 8.0% #1,205 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 101 Terwillegar Towne 6,478 people 8.0% #1,206 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 102 River Valley Oleskiw 9,922 people 7.9% #1,217 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 103 Glenbrook 10,185 people 7.9% #1,218 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 104 Patterson 4,169 people 7.9% #1,220 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living D 105 Capilano 5,046 people 7.9% #1,221 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 106 Virginia Park 3,431 people 7.9% #1,229 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 107 Signal Hill 13,293 people 7.8% #1,232 of 2,589 Strongest: schools A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living C− 108 Ranchlands 7,376 people 7.8% #1,234 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 109 Highlands 2,677 people 7.7% #1,256 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 110 Haddow 4,026 people 7.6% #1,263 of 2,589 Strongest: schools A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: safety C− 111 Glamorgan 6,479 people 7.6% #1,266 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , schools A+ · lowest: cost of living D 112 Bowness 11,548 people 7.6% #1,270 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 113 Grande Prairie 71,160 people 7.6% #1,275 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk B+ · lowest: safety D 114 Sturgeon County 21,144 people 7.5% #1,288 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools B+ · lowest: safety C 115 Okotoks 33,482 people 7.4% #1,302 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living C+ 116 Hidden Valley 10,614 people 7.4% #1,303 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living C+ 117 Midnapore 7,022 people 7.4% #1,305 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 118 Queen Mary Park 7,958 people 7.4% #1,313 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D 119 Inglewood 7,167 people 7.4% #1,316 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 120 Downtown West End 2,796 people 7.3% #1,319 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 121 Rocky Ridge 8,419 people 7.3% #1,320 of 2,589 Strongest: schools A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living C 122 Dalhousie 8,617 people 7.3% #1,325 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 123 Duggan 6,247 people 7.3% #1,332 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 124 Griesbach 6,640 people 7.3% #1,336 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 125 Alberta Avenue 6,097 people 7.3% #1,341 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D 126 Rhatigan Ridge 7,066 people 7.2% #1,344 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 127 Woodlands 5,391 people 7.2% #1,349 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 128 Palliser 4,987 people 7.2% #1,352 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D− 129 Haysboro 7,222 people 7.2% #1,355 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 130 Airdrie 92,544 people 7.2% #1,357 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , safety A− · lowest: schools C− 131 Willow Park 6,891 people 7.1% #1,364 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C− 132 Windermere 14,922 people 7.1% #1,366 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 133 Parkland 3,652 people 7.0% #1,380 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living C+ 134 Rocky View County 50,260 people 7.0% #1,390 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , hazard risk B+ · lowest: safety D 135 Ermineskin 7,483 people 7.0% #1,391 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 136 Richfield 3,456 people 7.0% #1,396 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C− 137 Royal Oak 12,343 people 6.9% #1,405 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living C 138 Paisley 2,897 people 6.9% #1,406 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 139 North Glenora 3,693 people 6.9% #1,412 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: safety C− 140 MacEwan 6,102 people 6.9% #1,413 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 141 Leger 4,108 people 6.8% #1,420 of 2,589 Strongest: schools A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: safety C− 142 Ogilvie Ridge 5,218 people 6.8% #1,422 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 143 Highland Park 4,908 people 6.8% #1,429 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A · lowest: cost of living D− 144 Blue Quill 4,567 people 6.8% #1,435 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 145 Kameyosek 2,761 people 6.8% #1,440 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 146 Sundance 9,043 people 6.7% #1,443 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living B− 147 Canyon Meadows 6,751 people 6.7% #1,444 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C− 148 Hawkwood 9,188 people 6.7% #1,445 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living C 149 Bearspaw 5,192 people 6.7% #1,452 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 150 Callaghan 4,180 people 6.7% #1,456 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 151 Strathcona County 107,345 people 6.6% #1,465 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety B− 152 Fish Creek Park 9,045 people 6.6% #1,468 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , schools A · lowest: cost of living C− 153 Fairview 3,909 people 6.6% #1,469 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 154 Acadia 9,950 people 6.6% #1,470 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 155 Thorncliffe 15,570 people 6.6% #1,472 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A · lowest: cost of living D 156 Meyonohk 2,822 people 6.6% #1,477 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 157 Parkdale 4,029 people 6.6% #1,484 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D 158 Braeside 5,706 people 6.5% #1,488 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 159 Athabasca 2,887 people 6.5% #1,494 of 2,589 Strongest: schools A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety D 160 Miller 3,294 people 6.5% #1,495 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 161 Twin Brooks 5,102 people 6.4% #1,503 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 162 Keswick 3,957 people 6.4% #1,506 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 163 Mactaggart 3,603 people 6.4% #1,507 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 164 Southwood 6,092 people 6.4% #1,509 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D 165 McConachie 10,450 people 6.4% #1,514 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 166 Lynnwood 3,452 people 6.4% #1,516 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 167 Skyrattler 2,956 people 6.4% #1,521 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: cost of living D 168 Athlone 3,242 people 6.4% #1,525 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 169 McCauley 4,060 people 6.4% #1,527 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D− 170 Overlanders 2,879 people 6.4% #1,530 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 171 Auburn Bay 18,296 people 6.3% #1,533 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living C+ 172 Summerside 16,760 people 6.3% #1,535 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 173 Kincora 7,290 people 6.3% #1,536 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living C− 174 Woodbine 8,075 people 6.3% #1,537 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , schools A · lowest: cost of living C 175 Glastonbury 9,745 people 6.3% #1,540 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 176 Kingsland 4,700 people 6.3% #1,541 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 177 Satoo 2,517 people 6.3% #1,543 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 178 Athabasca County 7,280 people 6.3% #1,551 of 2,589 Strongest: schools A , hazard risk A− · lowest: health D 179 West Jasper Place 3,427 people 6.3% #1,552 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 180 Crystallina Nera West 3,150 people 6.3% #1,560 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , health B · lowest: safety C− 181 Kirkness 5,279 people 6.3% #1,561 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 182 Silverado 9,663 people 6.2% #1,566 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C+ 183 Mahogany 17,818 people 6.2% #1,567 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living C 184 Arbour Lake 10,454 people 6.2% #1,568 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C− 185 Deer Run 3,652 people 6.2% #1,569 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living C− 186 Deer Ridge 4,454 people 6.2% #1,571 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 187 Ambleside 7,733 people 6.2% #1,575 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 188 Brintnell 6,658 people 6.2% #1,577 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 189 Gold Bar 2,685 people 6.2% #1,578 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety C− 190 Ekota 2,509 people 6.2% #1,580 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 191 Hillview 5,473 people 6.2% #1,583 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 192 Sylvan Lake 17,897 people 6.2% #1,585 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A− , walkability B · lowest: cost of living C 193 Sherbrooke 7,131 people 6.2% #1,586 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 194 Chaparral 12,522 people 6.1% #1,594 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , schools A · lowest: safety B− 195 Citadel 10,196 people 6.1% #1,596 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living C+ 196 Cameron Heights 3,710 people 6.1% #1,598 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 197 Rutherford 12,808 people 6.1% #1,603 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 198 Bulyea Heights 3,264 people 6.0% #1,618 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 199 McKenzie Lake 11,966 people 6.0% #1,619 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , schools A · lowest: cost of living C+ 200 Sage Hill 7,974 people 6.0% #1,620 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , schools A · lowest: cost of living C 201 Rosscarrock 3,862 people 6.0% #1,624 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 202 Cumberland 6,493 people 6.0% #1,629 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 203 Callingwood South 7,844 people 6.0% #1,632 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D− 204 Sakaw 3,453 people 6.0% #1,636 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 205 Britannia Youngstown 4,616 people 6.0% #1,637 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 206 Edson 8,692 people 6.0% #1,640 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability A− · lowest: schools D 207 Fort McMurray 81,611 people 6.0% #1,642 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living A , jobs & income B− · lowest: hazard risk D− 208 Montrose 3,378 people 6.0% #1,647 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: jobs & income D 209 Westwood 3,279 people 6.0% #1,649 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D− 210 Foothills County 25,789 people 5.9% #1,651 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , schools A · lowest: walkability C 211 McKenzie Towne 17,757 people 5.9% #1,652 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , jobs & income A− · lowest: cost of living C 212 Douglasdale/Glen 13,333 people 5.9% #1,653 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , jobs & income A · lowest: cost of living C+ 213 Cedarbrae 5,943 people 5.9% #1,654 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , schools A · lowest: cost of living D 214 Spruce Grove 44,575 people 5.9% #1,655 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A− · lowest: safety C 215 Legacy 7,975 people 5.9% #1,657 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , schools A− · lowest: cost of living C− 216 Ellerslie 5,963 people 5.9% #1,658 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 218 Gibbons 3,352 people 5.9% #1,668 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B+ · lowest: safety D 219 Tipaskan 2,875 people 5.9% #1,673 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 220 Leduc County 16,400 people 5.9% #1,674 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools B+ · lowest: safety D 221 Clareview Town Centre 3,800 people 5.9% #1,675 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: safety C− 222 Kiniski Gardens 6,864 people 5.8% #1,682 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 223 Cy Becker 2,683 people 5.8% #1,683 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 224 Glenridding Heights 4,388 people 5.8% #1,685 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 225 Macewan Glen 4,718 people 5.8% #1,686 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living C 226 Leduc 39,966 people 5.8% #1,691 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C 227 La Perle 7,889 people 5.8% #1,692 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 228 Canora 4,799 people 5.8% #1,697 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 229 Dunluce 6,079 people 5.8% #1,703 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 230 Jamieson Place 3,813 people 5.7% #1,711 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety C− 231 Fort Saskatchewan 30,575 people 5.7% #1,712 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety C+ 232 The Hamptons 12,008 people 5.7% #1,714 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 233 Charlesworth 8,135 people 5.7% #1,715 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 234 Chappelle 14,815 people 5.7% #1,716 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 235 Stony Plain 19,662 people 5.7% #1,720 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A− · lowest: cost of living C− 236 Mayland Heights 5,937 people 5.7% #1,727 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 237 Lee Ridge 2,722 people 5.7% #1,729 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living C− 238 Central McDougall 4,802 people 5.7% #1,733 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D− 239 Nolan Hill 8,581 people 5.6% #1,737 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living C 240 Shawnessy 9,696 people 5.6% #1,739 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living C− 241 Edgemont 5,059 people 5.6% #1,740 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 242 Cavanagh 7,300 people 5.6% #1,744 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 243 Minchau 2,576 people 5.6% #1,750 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 244 Hollick-Kenyon 6,451 people 5.6% #1,751 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 245 Tweddle Place 5,211 people 5.6% #1,753 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 246 Carlisle 4,609 people 5.6% #1,757 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C− 247 Eastwood 4,681 people 5.6% #1,760 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: jobs & income D− 248 Kildare 2,833 people 5.6% #1,763 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: jobs & income D 249 Edgemont 15,359 people 5.5% #1,769 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living C− 250 Larkspur 5,472 people 5.5% #1,772 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 251 Meadowlark Park 2,671 people 5.5% #1,778 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 252 Aldergrove 5,311 people 5.5% #1,780 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 253 Queensland 4,452 people 5.4% #1,792 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 254 Lymburn 7,231 people 5.4% #1,794 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 255 Pincher Creek 3,890 people 5.4% #1,806 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , jobs & income B · lowest: cost of living C 256 Wellington 3,314 people 5.4% #1,812 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 257 Delwood 3,491 people 5.4% #1,814 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: schools C− 258 Kilkenny 5,481 people 5.4% #1,815 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living C− 259 Cranston 20,055 people 5.3% #1,817 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , schools A− · lowest: cost of living C 260 Granville 2,994 people 5.3% #1,818 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 261 Webber Greens 5,035 people 5.3% #1,820 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 262 Beddington Heights 11,333 people 5.3% #1,824 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 263 Elmwood 2,522 people 5.3% #1,827 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: safety C− 264 Oxford 4,460 people 5.3% #1,829 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 265 Elsinore 5,796 people 5.3% #1,834 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income B · lowest: safety C− 266 Pollard Meadows 4,361 people 5.3% #1,837 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: jobs & income C− 267 Red Deer 115,409 people 5.3% #1,838 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A− , walkability A− · lowest: safety D 268 Kernohan 3,020 people 5.3% #1,839 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: schools D 269 Caernarvon 5,972 people 5.3% #1,841 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C− 270 Copperfield 13,952 people 5.2% #1,844 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , schools A · lowest: cost of living C 271 Coventry Hills 17,391 people 5.2% #1,845 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , schools A · lowest: cost of living C+ 272 Allard 8,148 people 5.2% #1,854 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 273 Lacombe 14,733 people 5.2% #1,855 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A− , walkability B+ · lowest: cost of living C 274 Klarvatten 6,773 people 5.2% #1,856 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 275 Wainwright 6,996 people 5.2% #1,857 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability A− · lowest: hazard risk D− 276 Lago Lindo 2,963 people 5.2% #1,859 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 277 Lethbridge 113,671 people 5.2% #1,860 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A− , walkability B+ · lowest: safety D 278 Woodcroft 2,770 people 5.2% #1,865 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D− 279 Homesteader 6,059 people 5.2% #1,866 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: schools C− 280 Beaumaris 4,125 people 5.2% #1,869 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B+ · lowest: cost of living D 281 Belvedere 5,337 people 5.2% #1,870 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: jobs & income D 283 Rapperswill 3,639 people 5.1% #1,880 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 284 Suder Greens 2,928 people 5.1% #1,882 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety C− 285 Ormsby Place 4,412 people 5.1% #1,884 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 286 Huntington Hills 13,184 people 5.1% #1,886 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A · lowest: cost of living D 287 Lloydminster (Part) 21,267 people 5.1% #1,888 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: safety D 288 Jasper Park 3,219 people 5.1% #1,890 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 289 Hudson 3,634 people 5.1% #1,892 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 290 Casselman 5,795 people 5.1% #1,903 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 291 Rundle Heights 5,175 people 5.1% #1,905 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: jobs & income D− 292 Westlock County 7,556 people 5.1% #1,906 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A− , jobs & income C+ · lowest: health D 293 Riverbend 9,193 people 5.0% #1,907 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , jobs & income A · lowest: cost of living C 294 Evanston 21,483 people 5.0% #1,908 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , schools A · lowest: cost of living C 295 Somerset 8,416 people 5.0% #1,910 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C− 296 Albany 3,015 people 5.0% #1,924 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools B+ · lowest: safety C− 297 Westview Village 6,590 people 5.0% #1,928 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools B+ · lowest: cost of living C− 299 New Brighton 13,048 people 4.9% #1,938 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , schools A · lowest: cost of living C 300 Evergreen 19,988 people 4.9% #1,940 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C 301 Maple 3,920 people 4.9% #1,942 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 302 Country Hills 3,702 people 4.9% #1,944 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A · lowest: cost of living C− 303 Crawford Plains 3,075 people 4.9% #1,950 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools B+ · lowest: safety C− 304 Wainwright No. 61 4,576 people 4.9% #1,952 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , schools B+ · lowest: hazard risk D− 305 West Meadowlark Park 5,386 people 4.9% #1,953 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 306 Crystallina Nera East 5,566 people 4.9% #1,957 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , health B · lowest: safety C− 307 Parkland County 34,286 people 4.9% #1,958 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety D 308 Calder 4,221 people 4.9% #1,974 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 309 Pincher Creek No. 9 3,176 people 4.9% #1,976 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income B , hazard risk C+ · lowest: schools C− 310 Secord 8,205 people 4.8% #1,979 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 311 Walden 8,190 people 4.8% #1,980 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , schools A · lowest: cost of living C 312 Jackson Heights 4,195 people 4.8% #1,982 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 313 Walker 13,388 people 4.8% #1,983 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 314 Belmead 3,970 people 4.8% #1,990 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 315 Whitecourt 10,708 people 4.8% #1,994 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A− , hazard risk B+ · lowest: safety D 316 York 4,030 people 4.8% #1,999 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: safety C− 317 Newton 2,809 people 4.8% #2,000 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 318 Bannerman 5,187 people 4.8% #2,002 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: schools C− 319 Lauderdale 2,954 people 4.8% #2,003 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C− 320 Beverly Heights 3,252 people 4.8% #2,004 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 321 Balwin 4,092 people 4.8% #2,005 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 323 Millrise 6,754 people 4.7% #2,010 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living C− 324 Sandstone Valley 5,816 people 4.7% #2,011 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living C− 326 Ogden 8,484 people 4.7% #2,024 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 327 Meyokumin 4,069 people 4.7% #2,028 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 328 Carlton 5,502 people 4.6% #2,040 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools B+ · lowest: safety C− 329 Silver Berry 9,439 people 4.6% #2,043 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 330 Turner Valley 2,784 people 4.6% #2,046 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , safety A− · lowest: cost of living D 331 Black Diamond 2,910 people 4.6% #2,049 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , safety A− · lowest: schools D 332 Weinlos 3,243 people 4.6% #2,053 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 333 Daly Grove 3,486 people 4.6% #2,054 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 335 Lorelei 4,380 people 4.6% #2,060 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 336 Grimshaw 2,799 people 4.6% #2,064 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A− , hazard risk B+ · lowest: schools D− 337 Delton 2,657 people 4.6% #2,065 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: jobs & income D 338 Rosenthal 4,873 people 4.5% #2,072 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 339 Skyview Ranch 14,061 people 4.5% #2,078 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 340 Baturyn 4,796 people 4.5% #2,084 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 341 Belmont 5,299 people 4.5% #2,093 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: safety C− 342 Country Hills Village 2,731 people 4.4% #2,105 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A · lowest: cost of living D 343 Bisset 3,049 people 4.4% #2,108 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: safety C− 344 Belle Rive 3,946 people 4.4% #2,116 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 345 High Prairie 2,607 people 4.4% #2,129 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: schools D− 346 Beacon Heights 4,389 people 4.4% #2,133 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: schools C− 347 Sherwood 6,537 people 4.3% #2,137 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living C− 348 High River 15,508 people 4.3% #2,138 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , safety B+ · lowest: cost of living C 349 Blackfalds 12,258 people 4.3% #2,146 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A− , safety B+ · lowest: health C 350 Glenwood 4,842 people 4.3% #2,155 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 351 Fraser 3,973 people 4.3% #2,158 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: schools D 352 Livingston 3,929 people 4.2% #2,165 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , schools A · lowest: cost of living C− 353 Thorncliff 3,564 people 4.2% #2,174 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C− 354 Mayliewan 4,259 people 4.2% #2,182 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , health B · lowest: safety C− 355 Dover 10,440 people 4.2% #2,184 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , health A · lowest: cost of living D 356 Rosslyn 3,242 people 4.2% #2,188 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living C− 357 Crossfield 4,075 people 4.2% #2,189 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , hazard risk B+ · lowest: schools D− 358 Yellowhead County 10,966 people 4.2% #2,193 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk B+ , cost of living B− · lowest: health D− 359 Wild Rose 8,534 people 4.1% #2,196 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 360 Abbeydale 6,561 people 4.1% #2,207 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , walkability A · lowest: schools D 361 Tamarack 6,860 people 4.0% #2,220 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 362 Canossa 3,246 people 4.0% #2,228 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 363 Kensington 3,697 people 4.0% #2,238 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 364 Rocky Mountain House 8,144 people 4.0% #2,242 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A− , walkability B · lowest: safety D 365 Northern Lights County 4,115 people 4.0% #2,244 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living A− , schools B− · lowest: health D− 366 Evansdale 5,602 people 4.0% #2,245 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: jobs & income D 367 Killarney 4,165 people 4.0% #2,246 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: jobs & income D 368 Bridlewood 12,547 people 3.9% #2,250 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C 369 Chestermere 31,671 people 3.9% #2,251 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , safety A− · lowest: schools C 370 Falconridge 10,218 people 3.9% #2,262 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: jobs & income D 371 Forest Heights 6,120 people 3.9% #2,263 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: schools D 372 Northmount 3,349 people 3.9% #2,270 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 373 Camrose 20,800 people 3.9% #2,272 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability B+ · lowest: cost of living C− 374 Panorama Hills 25,494 people 3.8% #2,278 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , schools A · lowest: cost of living C− 375 Carrington 2,920 people 3.8% #2,279 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , schools A · lowest: cost of living C 376 Harvest Hills 7,930 people 3.8% #2,282 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living C− 377 Coalhurst 3,244 people 3.8% #2,283 of 2,589 Strongest: safety A , jobs & income B · lowest: cost of living C+ 378 Ozerna 4,216 people 3.8% #2,291 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 379 Eaux Claires 3,334 people 3.8% #2,299 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: safety C− 380 Woodlands County 4,778 people 3.8% #2,301 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A− , hazard risk B+ · lowest: health D 381 Hamptons 7,342 people 3.7% #2,307 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living C+ 382 Strathmore 16,416 people 3.7% #2,314 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , hazard risk B+ · lowest: schools C− 383 Medicine Hat 68,714 people 3.7% #2,315 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C 384 Slave Lake 7,334 people 3.7% #2,316 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability A · lowest: hazard risk D− 385 Barrhead 4,768 people 3.7% #2,317 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk B+ · lowest: health C− 386 Pineridge 10,062 people 3.7% #2,318 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 387 Matt Berry 4,093 people 3.6% #2,331 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 388 Red Deer County 22,076 people 3.6% #2,334 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A− , schools B+ · lowest: cost of living D 389 Forest Lawn 7,513 people 3.6% #2,336 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A · lowest: jobs & income D− 390 Glengarry 3,087 people 3.6% #2,338 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 391 Westlock 5,363 people 3.6% #2,339 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk A− · lowest: safety D 392 Big Lakes County 5,106 people 3.6% #2,342 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living B+ , walkability C · lowest: schools D− 393 Carstairs 5,248 people 3.5% #2,343 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , schools A− · lowest: cost of living C 394 Penbrooke Meadows 10,001 people 3.5% #2,347 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , walkability A · lowest: jobs & income D 395 Olds 9,653 people 3.5% #2,348 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability A− · lowest: schools C− 396 Redstone 13,230 people 3.4% #2,357 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , walkability B+ · lowest: cost of living C− 397 Crowsnest Pass 6,011 people 3.4% #2,360 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A− , schools B+ · lowest: safety C 398 Applewood Park 6,835 people 3.4% #2,364 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , walkability A · lowest: schools D 399 Temple 10,545 people 3.3% #2,379 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , walkability A · lowest: schools D 400 Erin Woods 7,245 people 3.3% #2,380 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , walkability A− · lowest: schools D 401 Marlborough Park 8,378 people 3.3% #2,383 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , walkability A · lowest: schools D 402 Sexsmith 2,561 people 3.3% #2,384 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living A , hazard risk B+ · lowest: health D 403 Grande Cache 8,984 people 3.3% #2,387 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living B+ , hazard risk B+ · lowest: health D− 404 Lac Ste. Anne County 12,639 people 3.3% #2,390 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk B+ , cost of living B− · lowest: health D− 405 Castleridge 6,127 people 3.2% #2,398 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: cost of living C− 406 Nanton 2,522 people 3.1% #2,409 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , schools A · lowest: cost of living C 407 Mountain View County 14,802 people 3.1% #2,410 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , hazard risk A− · lowest: walkability C− 408 Devon 6,965 people 3.1% #2,413 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living C 409 Rundle 10,549 people 3.1% #2,417 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: schools D 410 Raymond 4,594 people 3.0% #2,419 of 2,589 Strongest: schools A , safety A · lowest: jobs & income B− 411 Brooks 17,537 people 3.0% #2,420 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety C 412 Laurel 15,263 people 3.0% #2,423 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A− · lowest: safety C− 413 Penhold 3,812 people 3.0% #2,424 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk B+ , jobs & income B+ · lowest: health C 414 Cypress County 7,855 people 3.0% #2,426 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A− · lowest: schools C− 415 Innisfail 8,736 people 3.0% #2,428 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A− , walkability B+ · lowest: cost of living C− 416 Clearwater County 11,856 people 3.0% #2,438 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk B+ , cost of living B · lowest: safety D 417 Lacombe County 11,072 people 2.9% #2,445 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A− , jobs & income B · lowest: safety C− 418 Wetaskiwin 13,703 people 2.9% #2,452 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A− , walkability B+ · lowest: safety D 419 Sundre 2,683 people 2.8% #2,455 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A− , schools B+ · lowest: safety C− 420 Cityscape 11,782 people 2.8% #2,456 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 421 Whitehorn 11,273 people 2.8% #2,457 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: schools D 422 Cardston 3,863 people 2.8% #2,458 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability B+ , jobs & income B+ · lowest: safety C− 423 Monterey Park 10,363 people 2.8% #2,459 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , walkability B+ · lowest: schools D 424 Marlborough 8,932 people 2.8% #2,460 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A+ · lowest: schools D 426 Taradale 17,911 people 2.7% #2,467 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A · lowest: schools C− 427 Thorhild County 3,147 people 2.7% #2,469 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A− , cost of living A− · lowest: health D− 428 Beaver County 6,245 people 2.7% #2,470 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , cost of living C+ · lowest: walkability D 429 Vermilion 4,192 people 2.6% #2,476 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: safety D 430 High Level 4,390 people 2.6% #2,479 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A · lowest: hazard risk D− 432 Didsbury 5,185 people 2.5% #2,486 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , hazard risk A− · lowest: schools D 433 Drumheller 8,439 people 2.5% #2,488 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 434 Camrose County 8,951 people 2.5% #2,489 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income B · lowest: walkability D 435 Wheatland County 10,150 people 2.5% #2,491 of 2,589 Strongest: health A− , hazard risk A− · lowest: safety D− 437 Fairview 2,918 people 2.4% #2,496 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A− , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 438 Redcliff 5,916 people 2.4% #2,497 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income B− · lowest: schools C− 439 Ponoka 8,212 people 2.4% #2,498 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A− , hazard risk A− · lowest: safety D 440 Lamont County 3,918 people 2.4% #2,503 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income B− · lowest: walkability C− 441 Coaldale 9,644 people 2.3% #2,505 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A− , schools A− · lowest: cost of living C 442 Vermilion River County 8,282 people 2.3% #2,506 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: health C− 443 Three Hills 3,502 people 2.2% #2,511 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 444 Coral Springs 5,542 people 2.2% #2,512 of 2,589 Strongest: health A , walkability B+ · lowest: schools D 445 Martindale 14,467 people 2.2% #2,513 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , health A · lowest: schools C− 446 Claresholm 4,242 people 2.2% #2,514 of 2,589 Strongest: health A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C 447 Drayton Valley 8,047 people 2.1% #2,521 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A− , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety D 448 Vegreville 6,153 people 2.0% #2,527 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A · lowest: safety D 449 Minburn County No. 27 3,142 people 2.0% #2,528 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A− · lowest: walkability D 450 Cardston County 4,938 people 2.0% #2,530 of 2,589 Strongest: schools A− , cost of living B+ · lowest: walkability D− 451 Ponoka County 10,670 people 2.0% #2,532 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A− , jobs & income B · lowest: walkability D 452 Saddle Ridge 21,479 people 1.9% #2,536 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , health A · lowest: cost of living C− 453 Smoky Lake County 4,043 people 1.9% #2,537 of 2,589 Strongest: schools A , hazard risk A− · lowest: safety D 454 Willow Creek No. 26 6,225 people 1.9% #2,538 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income B , walkability B− · lowest: safety C 455 Rimbey 2,502 people 1.9% #2,539 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A− · lowest: safety C− 456 Stettler 6,035 people 1.8% #2,541 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A− , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety C− 457 Lethbridge County 10,988 people 1.8% #2,544 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A− , hazard risk B · lowest: cost of living C− 458 Brazeau County 7,685 people 1.8% #2,545 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A− , jobs & income B · lowest: walkability D 459 Two Hills County No. 21 3,626 people 1.8% #2,546 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , cost of living B− · lowest: schools D− 460 Magrath 2,566 people 1.6% #2,554 of 2,589 Strongest: safety A , schools A · lowest: hazard risk C+ 461 Fort Macleod 3,945 people 1.6% #2,559 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , health B · lowest: schools D− 462 Kneehill County 5,129 people 1.5% #2,560 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A− , jobs & income B · lowest: safety C− 463 Newell County 7,846 people 1.4% #2,563 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , safety A− · lowest: walkability C+ 464 Stettler County No. 6 5,966 people 1.4% #2,565 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A− , schools A− · lowest: walkability C− 465 Hanna 2,665 people 1.3% #2,568 of 2,589 Strongest: schools A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: safety C+ 466 Warner County No. 5 4,533 people 1.3% #2,569 of 2,589 Strongest: schools A+ , safety A · lowest: walkability D 467 Vulcan County 4,465 people 1.3% #2,570 of 2,589 Strongest: health A− , hazard risk B+ · lowest: jobs & income C 468 Opportunity No. 17 3,592 people 1.3% #2,574 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living A , jobs & income B− · lowest: schools D− 469 Flagstaff County 3,724 people 1.2% #2,575 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety C− 470 Taber 10,175 people 1.1% #2,579 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A− , hazard risk B · lowest: safety C 471 Clear Hills 3,110 people 0.8% #2,583 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk B+ , cost of living C− · lowest: health D− 472 Forty Mile County No. 8 3,927 people 0.6% #2,586 of 2,589 Strongest: safety A , hazard risk A · lowest: jobs & income C− 473 Taber 8,009 people 0.5% #2,587 of 2,589 Strongest: safety A+ , hazard risk B · lowest: walkability C− 474 La Crète 14,488 people 0.5% #2,588 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income B · lowest: schools D Rankings
More lists for Alberta Province by province
Most bilingual elsewhere Photos: Bonnie Doon, TagaSanPedroAko (CC BY-SA 4.0 ) · Jasper, Fil.Al (CC BY 2.0 ), via Wikimedia Commons.
Sources: TownRatings grades: our own summary of the data, ranking Canadian towns against each other only, run #73 of 10 November 2026. Under the Statistics Canada Open Licence.
Adapted from Statistics Canada (Census of Population 2021, population estimates 2025, 2021 census boundaries) under the Statistics Canada Open Licence; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood names in some cities © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).