Home › Canada › Saskatchewan › Rankings › Least snow Rosetown, #1 on this list · Photo: Canadian2006 (CC BY-SA 3.0) Saskatchewan · 2026 Towns with the least snow in Saskatchewan The national top 100 holds no place from Saskatchewan. Leading Saskatchewan on this list is Rosetown, at 66 cm. The places after the leader belong to Humboldt (85 cm) and Kindersley (86 cm). Halfway down the list sits Nutana Urban Centre, at 91 cm. At the other end is La Loche, with 149 cm. Across Canada, the same list puts Rosetown #175 of 2,538.
Snowfall a year, 1991–2020 normals at the nearest station that measures snow How grades work
#1 Saskatchewan · 2,600 people 66 cm Snowfall a year Overall A+ · #31 of 2,556
Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A · lowest: hazard risk B
#2 Saskatchewan · 6,551 people 85 cm Snowfall a year Overall A− · #501 of 2,556
Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: health C−
#3 Saskatchewan · 4,740 people 86 cm Snowfall a year Overall A− · #554 of 2,556
Strongest: jobs & income A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C−
All 101, ranked in Saskatchewan Best first in Saskatchewan; beside each place, its rank on the same list for all of Canada.
Every Saskatchewan list # Town Snowfall a year Canada rank What drives it
1 Rosetown 2,600 people 66 cm #175 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A · lowest: hazard risk B 2 Humboldt 6,551 people 85 cm #177 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: health C− 3 Kindersley 4,740 people 86 cm #185 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 4 Swift Current 18,154 people 88 cm #191 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , health B · lowest: safety C− 5 Warman 14,245 people 91 cm #199 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , safety A · lowest: walkability B− 6 Martensville 11,808 people 91 cm #200 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: walkability C+ 7 Brighton 7,238 people 91 cm #201 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 8 Dundonald 2,855 people 91 cm #202 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 9 Hampton Village 9,119 people 91 cm #203 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 10 Corman Park No. 344 10,463 people 91 cm #204 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: walkability C− 11 Lakewood Urban Centre 4,923 people 91 cm #205 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 12 Adelaide/Churchill 2,652 people 91 cm #206 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 13 Silverwood Heights 8,153 people 91 cm #207 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 14 Willowgrove 9,787 people 91 cm #208 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 15 Holliston 2,963 people 91 cm #209 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 17 Nutana Park 3,045 people 91 cm #211 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 18 Confederation Park 5,771 people 91 cm #212 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 19 Evergreen 16,088 people 91 cm #213 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 20 Vanscoy No. 345 3,029 people 91 cm #214 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A− · lowest: walkability C 21 Greystone Heights 6,402 people 91 cm #215 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 22 Buena Vista 5,777 people 91 cm #216 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , jobs & income A+ · lowest: cost of living D 23 Lawson Heights 8,158 people 91 cm #217 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 24 Westview 2,670 people 91 cm #218 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety C− 25 Stonebridge 15,230 people 91 cm #219 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 26 Avalon 9,488 people 91 cm #220 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 27 Rosewood 8,427 people 91 cm #221 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 28 Haultain 6,126 people 91 cm #222 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D 29 Pacific Heights 3,770 people 91 cm #223 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 30 Brevoort Park 3,485 people 91 cm #224 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D 31 Parkridge 4,518 people 91 cm #225 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 33 Caswell Hill 2,573 people 91 cm #227 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 35 City Park 3,827 people 91 cm #229 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D− 36 South West Industrial 5,297 people 91 cm #230 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 37 Lakewood 14,880 people 91 cm #231 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 38 Fairhaven 6,536 people 91 cm #232 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 40 Mayfair 2,927 people 91 cm #234 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk A · lowest: safety C− 41 Rosthern No. 403 2,791 people 91 cm #235 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: health D− 42 North Park 5,000 people 91 cm #236 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 43 Eastview 7,536 people 91 cm #237 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , jobs & income B+ · lowest: cost of living D 44 University 5,888 people 91 cm #238 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 45 Westmount 2,872 people 91 cm #239 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D 46 Mount Royal 5,292 people 91 cm #240 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 48 Massey Place 6,561 people 91 cm #242 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 49 Meadowgreen 3,782 people 91 cm #243 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 50 Pleasant Hill 6,088 people 91 cm #244 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D 51 Nutana Urban Centre 5,926 people 91 cm #245 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D 52 Grosvenor Park 6,240 people 91 cm #246 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A · lowest: cost of living D− 53 Outlook 2,629 people 99 cm #265 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , safety A− · lowest: hazard risk B 54 Lloydminster (Part) 13,137 people 103 cm #278 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A− , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety D 55 White City 4,379 people 105 cm #279 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A− · lowest: walkability C 56 Pilot Butte 3,255 people 105 cm #280 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , cost of living A− · lowest: walkability C 57 Edenwold No. 158 4,932 people 105 cm #281 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , safety B+ · lowest: walkability C 59 Lakeview 7,770 people 105 cm #283 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 60 Whitmore Park 6,603 people 105 cm #286 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 61 Twin Lakes 7,286 people 105 cm #287 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 62 Arcola East 33,823 people 105 cm #289 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 63 Prairie View 8,517 people 105 cm #290 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A− · lowest: safety C− 64 Uplands 5,273 people 105 cm #291 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 65 Normanview West 2,866 people 105 cm #292 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 66 Dewdney East 18,670 people 105 cm #293 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 67 Boothill 2,613 people 105 cm #294 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 68 Argyle North 9,971 people 105 cm #295 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 69 Sherwood/McCarthy 5,753 people 105 cm #296 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , health B · lowest: safety C− 70 Regent Park 2,876 people 105 cm #297 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 72 Harbour Landing 14,402 people 105 cm #299 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , health B · lowest: safety C− 73 Albert Park 12,967 people 105 cm #300 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , jobs & income A− · lowest: cost of living C− 74 Cathedral Village 7,311 people 105 cm #301 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , health B+ · lowest: cost of living C− 75 Moose Jaw 36,337 people 105 cm #302 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability B+ , hazard risk B · lowest: safety C− 76 Rosemont/Mount Royal 10,497 people 105 cm #303 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income B+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 77 Al Ritchie 8,087 people 105 cm #305 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 78 Hillsdale 6,792 people 105 cm #306 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 79 Coronation Park 7,307 people 105 cm #307 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , health B+ · lowest: cost of living C− 80 North Central 9,124 people 105 cm #308 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , health B+ · lowest: jobs & income D 81 Northeast 9,670 people 105 cm #310 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A− , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 82 Downtown 4,282 people 105 cm #311 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 83 Heritage 5,172 people 105 cm #312 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 84 Dewdney Place 3,021 people 105 cm #313 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A+ , health B+ · lowest: cost of living D 85 McNab 2,510 people 105 cm #314 of 2,538 Strongest: health B+ , walkability B · lowest: cost of living D 86 Buckland No. 491 3,550 people 112 cm #336 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety D− 87 Prince Albert 40,728 people 112 cm #337 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B · lowest: safety D− 88 Prince Albert No. 461 3,589 people 112 cm #338 of 2,538 Strongest: hazard risk A , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety D− 89 Estevan 11,391 people 118 cm #643 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A · lowest: health C− 90 Weyburn 11,871 people 118 cm #644 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability B · lowest: health C− 91 Melville 4,547 people 120 cm #645 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 92 Yorkton 17,543 people 120 cm #646 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A− , walkability B+ · lowest: safety D 93 Meadow Lake 5,667 people 125 cm #828 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk A− · lowest: safety D− 94 Meadow Lake No. 588 2,712 people 125 cm #829 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A− · lowest: walkability D 95 Esterhazy 2,513 people 125 cm #830 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A · lowest: health C− 96 Tisdale 3,052 people 128 cm #1,017 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , hazard risk B+ · lowest: safety D 97 Melfort 6,028 people 128 cm #1,018 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability A− · lowest: safety D 98 Nipawin 5,033 people 128 cm #1,019 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A− , hazard risk B+ · lowest: safety D 99 Moosomin 2,906 people 142 cm #1,305 of 2,538 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A− · lowest: health C− 100 La Ronge 2,668 people 146 cm #1,309 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A− , jobs & income A− · lowest: hazard risk D− 101 La Loche 3,124 people 149 cm #1,432 of 2,538 Strongest: walkability A , cost of living A− · lowest: hazard risk D− Rankings
More lists for Saskatchewan Province by province
Least snow elsewhere Photos: Rosetown, Canadian2006 (CC BY-SA 3.0 ) · Humboldt, Tourismhumboldt (CC BY-SA 3.0 ) · Kindersley, Ktownsk (Public domain ), via Wikimedia Commons.
Sources: TownRatings grades: our own summary of the data, ranking Canadian towns against each other only, run #73 of 10 November 2026. Under the Statistics Canada Open Licence.
Adapted from Statistics Canada (Census of Population 2021, population estimates 2025, 2021 census boundaries) under the Statistics Canada Open Licence; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood names in some cities © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).