Bonnie Doon, #1 on this list · Photo: TagaSanPedroAko (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Edmonton · 2026

Most bilingual neighbourhoods in Edmonton

On the national list, Bonnie Doon is #659 of 2,589. The national top 100 holds no neighbourhood from Edmonton. Leading Edmonton on this list is Bonnie Doon, at 20.6%. The places after the leader belong to Holyrood (15.4%) and Laurier Heights (13.8%). Halfway down the list sits La Perle, at 5.8%. At the other end is Laurel, with 3.0%.

Share of residents who can hold a conversation in both English and French, 2021 census How grades work

Bonnie Doon

Alberta · 6,697 people

20.6% English and French

Overall C⁺·#1,674 of 2,556

Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

Holyrood

Alberta · 3,305 people

15.4% English and French

Overall B⁻·#1,272 of 2,556

Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

Laurier Heights

Alberta · 3,048 people

13.8% English and French

Overall A·#264 of 2,556

Strongest: jobs & income A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

All 192 neighbourhoods, ranked

Best first in Edmonton; beside each place, its rank on the same list for all of Canada.

Every Edmonton list

Find a town

192 neighbourhoods

#NeighbourhoodEnglish and FrenchCanada rankWhat drives it

1Bonnie Doon6,697 people20.6%#659 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

2Holyrood3,305 people15.4%#775 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

3Laurier Heights3,048 people13.8%#809 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

4Ritchie5,215 people13.7%#813 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living C⁻

5Strathcona8,283 people12.8%#862 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D⁻

6Belgravia5,478 people12.7%#865 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

7Greenfield3,710 people12.5%#873 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

8Riverdale5,490 people12.5%#877 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living D

9Avonmore2,971 people12.2%#888 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

10Forest Heights4,118 people11.8%#908 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: cost of living D

11Allendale2,951 people11.4%#922 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

12Patricia Heights4,355 people10.9%#945 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, jobs & income A·lowest: safety C⁻

13Brookside3,173 people10.6%#960 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

14Parkview5,729 people10.3%#982 of 2,589Strongest: jobs & income A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

15Malmo Plains4,150 people10.3%#985 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

16Ramsay Heights3,434 people10.0%#1,004 of 2,589Strongest: schools A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

17Hazeldean3,247 people10.0%#1,005 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living C⁻

18Sweet Grass2,616 people9.9%#1,015 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: cost of living C⁻

19Westmount4,961 people9.8%#1,023 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, jobs & income A·lowest: cost of living D

20Wîhkwêntôwin19,050 people9.8%#1,025 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

21Queen Alexandra5,106 people9.8%#1,026 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D⁻

22Downtown12,880 people9.7%#1,032 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

23Glenora6,197 people9.6%#1,035 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, jobs & income A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

24King Edward Park8,399 people9.6%#1,039 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living D

25Ottewell8,040 people9.2%#1,064 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living C⁻

26Greenview2,822 people9.0%#1,084 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

27Pleasantview3,746 people8.9%#1,104 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

28Royal Gardens3,392 people8.7%#1,125 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

29South Terwillegar8,183 people8.2%#1,186 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

30Boyle Street5,862 people8.2%#1,192 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: jobs & income D⁻

31Westbrook Estates2,838 people8.1%#1,196 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

32Trumpeter Area5,220 people8.1%#1,200 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, jobs & income A⁺·lowest: walkability D

33Magrath Heights3,728 people8.0%#1,205 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

34Terwillegar Towne6,478 people8.0%#1,206 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

35River Valley Oleskiw9,922 people7.9%#1,217 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

36Capilano5,046 people7.9%#1,221 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, jobs & income A·lowest: safety C⁻

37Virginia Park3,431 people7.9%#1,229 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

38Highlands2,677 people7.7%#1,256 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

39Haddow4,026 people7.6%#1,263 of 2,589Strongest: schools A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

40Queen Mary Park7,958 people7.4%#1,313 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: jobs & income D

41Inglewood7,167 people7.4%#1,316 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D⁻

42Duggan6,247 people7.3%#1,332 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

43Griesbach6,640 people7.3%#1,336 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

44Alberta Avenue6,097 people7.3%#1,341 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: jobs & income D

45Rhatigan Ridge7,066 people7.2%#1,344 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

46Windermere14,922 people7.1%#1,366 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

47Ermineskin7,483 people7.0%#1,391 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

48Richfield3,456 people7.0%#1,396 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living C⁻

49Paisley2,897 people6.9%#1,406 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

50North Glenora3,693 people6.9%#1,412 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

51MacEwan6,102 people6.9%#1,413 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

52Leger4,108 people6.8%#1,420 of 2,589Strongest: schools A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

53Ogilvie Ridge5,218 people6.8%#1,422 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

54Blue Quill4,567 people6.8%#1,435 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

55Kameyosek2,761 people6.8%#1,440 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living D

56Bearspaw5,192 people6.7%#1,452 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

57Callaghan4,180 people6.7%#1,456 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

58Meyonohk2,822 people6.6%#1,477 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

59Parkdale4,029 people6.6%#1,484 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: jobs & income D

60Miller3,294 people6.5%#1,495 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

61Twin Brooks5,102 people6.4%#1,503 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

62Keswick3,957 people6.4%#1,506 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

63Mactaggart3,603 people6.4%#1,507 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

64McConachie10,450 people6.4%#1,514 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

65Lynnwood3,452 people6.4%#1,516 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

66Skyrattler2,956 people6.4%#1,521 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

67Athlone3,242 people6.4%#1,525 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

68McCauley4,060 people6.4%#1,527 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: jobs & income D⁻

69Overlanders2,879 people6.4%#1,530 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living D

70Summerside16,760 people6.3%#1,535 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

71Glastonbury9,745 people6.3%#1,540 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

72Satoo2,517 people6.3%#1,543 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

73West Jasper Place3,427 people6.3%#1,552 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D⁻

74Crystallina Nera West3,150 people6.3%#1,560 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, health B·lowest: safety C⁻

75Kirkness5,279 people6.3%#1,561 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

76Ambleside7,733 people6.2%#1,575 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

77Brintnell6,658 people6.2%#1,577 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

78Gold Bar2,685 people6.2%#1,578 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, jobs & income A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

79Ekota2,509 people6.2%#1,580 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

80Hillview5,473 people6.2%#1,583 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

81Sherbrooke7,131 people6.2%#1,586 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

82Cameron Heights3,710 people6.1%#1,598 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

83Rutherford12,808 people6.1%#1,603 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

84Bulyea Heights3,264 people6.0%#1,618 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

85Cumberland6,493 people6.0%#1,629 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, cost of living B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

86Callingwood South7,844 people6.0%#1,632 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: jobs & income D⁻

87Sakaw3,453 people6.0%#1,636 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: cost of living D

88Britannia Youngstown4,616 people6.0%#1,637 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

89Montrose3,378 people6.0%#1,647 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: jobs & income D

90Westwood3,279 people6.0%#1,649 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: jobs & income D⁻

91Ellerslie5,963 people5.9%#1,658 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

92Tipaskan2,875 people5.9%#1,673 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

93Clareview Town Centre3,800 people5.9%#1,675 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

94Kiniski Gardens6,864 people5.8%#1,682 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

95Cy Becker2,683 people5.8%#1,683 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, jobs & income A·lowest: safety C⁻

96Glenridding Heights4,388 people5.8%#1,685 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

97La Perle7,889 people5.8%#1,692 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

98Canora4,799 people5.8%#1,697 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

99Dunluce6,079 people5.8%#1,703 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

100Jamieson Place3,813 people5.7%#1,711 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, jobs & income A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

101The Hamptons12,008 people5.7%#1,714 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

102Charlesworth8,135 people5.7%#1,715 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

103Chappelle14,815 people5.7%#1,716 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

104Lee Ridge2,722 people5.7%#1,729 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living C⁻

105Central McDougall4,802 people5.7%#1,733 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: jobs & income D⁻

106Edgemont5,059 people5.6%#1,740 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

107Cavanagh7,300 people5.6%#1,744 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

108Minchau2,576 people5.6%#1,750 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

109Hollick-Kenyon6,451 people5.6%#1,751 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

110Tweddle Place5,211 people5.6%#1,753 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

111Carlisle4,609 people5.6%#1,757 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living C⁻

112Eastwood4,681 people5.6%#1,760 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: jobs & income D⁻

113Kildare2,833 people5.6%#1,763 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: jobs & income D

114Larkspur5,472 people5.5%#1,772 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

115Meadowlark Park2,671 people5.5%#1,778 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

116Aldergrove5,311 people5.5%#1,780 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

117Lymburn7,231 people5.4%#1,794 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

118Wellington3,314 people5.4%#1,812 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

119Delwood3,491 people5.4%#1,814 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: schools C⁻

120Kilkenny5,481 people5.4%#1,815 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: cost of living C⁻

121Granville2,994 people5.3%#1,818 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

122Webber Greens5,035 people5.3%#1,820 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

123Elmwood2,522 people5.3%#1,827 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

124Oxford4,460 people5.3%#1,829 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

125Elsinore5,796 people5.3%#1,834 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, jobs & income B·lowest: safety C⁻

126Pollard Meadows4,361 people5.3%#1,837 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: jobs & income C⁻

127Kernohan3,020 people5.3%#1,839 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: schools D

128Caernarvon5,972 people5.3%#1,841 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living C⁻

129Allard8,148 people5.2%#1,854 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

130Klarvatten6,773 people5.2%#1,856 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, cost of living B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

131Lago Lindo2,963 people5.2%#1,859 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

132Woodcroft2,770 people5.2%#1,865 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living D⁻

133Homesteader6,059 people5.2%#1,866 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: schools C⁻

134Beaumaris4,125 people5.2%#1,869 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability B⁺·lowest: cost of living D

135Belvedere5,337 people5.2%#1,870 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: jobs & income D

136Rapperswill3,639 people5.1%#1,880 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, cost of living B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

137Suder Greens2,928 people5.1%#1,882 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, jobs & income A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

138Ormsby Place4,412 people5.1%#1,884 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

139Jasper Park3,219 people5.1%#1,890 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

140Hudson3,634 people5.1%#1,892 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

141Casselman5,795 people5.1%#1,903 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

142Rundle Heights5,175 people5.1%#1,905 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: jobs & income D⁻

143Albany3,015 people5.0%#1,924 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

144Westview Village6,590 people5.0%#1,928 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools B⁺·lowest: cost of living C⁻

145Edmonton Energy And Technology Park5,225 people5.0%#1,929 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, health B·lowest: safety C⁻

146Maple3,920 people4.9%#1,942 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

147Crawford Plains3,075 people4.9%#1,950 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

148West Meadowlark Park5,386 people4.9%#1,953 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

149Crystallina Nera East5,566 people4.9%#1,957 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, health B·lowest: safety C⁻

150Calder4,221 people4.9%#1,974 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living D

151Secord8,205 people4.8%#1,979 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

152Jackson Heights4,195 people4.8%#1,982 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

153Walker13,388 people4.8%#1,983 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

154Belmead3,970 people4.8%#1,990 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

155York4,030 people4.8%#1,999 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

156Newton2,809 people4.8%#2,000 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

157Bannerman5,187 people4.8%#2,002 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: schools C⁻

158Lauderdale2,954 people4.8%#2,003 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living C⁻

159Beverly Heights3,252 people4.8%#2,004 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: cost of living D

160Balwin4,092 people4.8%#2,005 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living D

161The Orchards At Ellerslie6,267 people4.7%#2,009 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

162Anthony Henday South East4,960 people4.7%#2,013 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

163Meyokumin4,069 people4.7%#2,028 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living D

164Carlton5,502 people4.6%#2,040 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

165Silver Berry9,439 people4.6%#2,043 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

166Weinlos3,243 people4.6%#2,053 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

167Daly Grove3,486 people4.6%#2,054 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

168Lorelei4,380 people4.6%#2,060 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

169Delton2,657 people4.6%#2,065 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: jobs & income D

170Rosenthal4,873 people4.5%#2,072 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

171Baturyn4,796 people4.5%#2,084 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

172Belmont5,299 people4.5%#2,093 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

173Bisset3,049 people4.4%#2,108 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

174Belle Rive3,946 people4.4%#2,116 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

175Beacon Heights4,389 people4.4%#2,133 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: schools C⁻

176Glenwood4,842 people4.3%#2,155 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

177Fraser3,973 people4.3%#2,158 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: schools D

178Thorncliff3,564 people4.2%#2,174 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living C⁻

179Mayliewan4,259 people4.2%#2,182 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, health B·lowest: safety C⁻

180Rosslyn3,242 people4.2%#2,188 of 2,589Strongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living C⁻

181Wild Rose8,534 people4.1%#2,196 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

182Tamarack6,860 people4.0%#2,220 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

183Canossa3,246 people4.0%#2,228 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, cost of living B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

184Kensington3,697 people4.0%#2,238 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

185Evansdale5,602 people4.0%#2,245 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: jobs & income D

186Killarney4,165 people4.0%#2,246 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: jobs & income D

187Northmount3,349 people3.9%#2,270 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

188Ozerna4,216 people3.8%#2,291 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

189Eaux Claires3,334 people3.8%#2,299 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

190Matt Berry4,093 people3.6%#2,331 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, health B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

191Glengarry3,087 people3.6%#2,338 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

192Laurel15,263 people3.0%#2,423 of 2,589Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

Rankings

More lists for Edmonton

All lists Best places to live Most affordable Safest Best schools Healthiest Jobs & income Most walkable Lowest hazard risk Civic life Highest incomes Most historic Most bilingual Youngest Oldest

City by city

Most bilingual elsewhere

Canada Toronto Montréal Calgary Edmonton Ottawa Winnipeg Brampton Mississauga Vancouver Surrey Hamilton Québec Halifax London Laval Markham Vaughan Kitchener Saskatoon Gatineau Burnaby Windsor Longueuil Regina

Photos: Bonnie Doon, TagaSanPedroAko (CC BY-SA 4.0) · Holyrood, Johntwrl (CC BY-SA 3.0) · Laurier Heights, Johntwrl at English Wikipedia (Public domain), via Wikimedia Commons.

Sources: TownRatings grades: our own summary of the data, ranking Canadian towns against each other only, run #73 of 10 November 2026. Under the Statistics Canada Open Licence.

Adapted from Statistics Canada (Census of Population 2021, population estimates 2025, 2021 census boundaries) under the Statistics Canada Open Licence; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood names in some cities © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).