Home › Canada › Alberta › Edmonton › Rankings › Most historic Strathcona, #1 on this list · Photo: Joli Rumi (CC BY-SA 4.0) Edmonton · 2026 Most historic neighbourhoods in Edmonton Last comes Westwood, at 0. Nationally, Strathcona ranks #85 of 2,589. A single neighbourhood in Edmonton reaches the top 100 for all of Canada. Nowhere in Edmonton does better on this list than Strathcona, at 7. Queen Alexandra is second (6) and Downtown third (5). The middle of the list is La Perle, with 0.
Places on Canada’s heritage registers per 10,000 people How grades work
#1 Overall B− · #1,488 of 2,556
Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D−
#2 Overall C+ · #1,720 of 2,556
Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D−
#3 Overall C+ · #1,529 of 2,556
Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D
All 192 neighbourhoods, ranked Best first in Edmonton; beside each place, its rank on the same list for all of Canada.
Every Edmonton list # Neighbourhood Per 10,000 people Canada rank What drives it
2 Queen Alexandra 5,106 people 6 #118 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 3 Downtown 12,880 people 5 #129 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 4 Highlands 2,677 people 4 #199 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 5 McCauley 4,060 people 2 #315 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D− 6 Ritchie 5,215 people 2 #376 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living C− 7 Boyle Street 5,862 people 2 #405 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D− 8 Glenora 6,197 people 2 #420 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A+ · lowest: safety C− 9 Sherbrooke 7,131 people 1 #455 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 10 Wîhkwêntôwin 19,050 people 1 #522 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 11 Rhatigan Ridge 7,066 people 0 #876 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 12 Brookside 3,173 people 0 #879 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 13 Parkview 5,729 people 0 #891 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: safety C− 14 Magrath Heights 3,728 people 0 #896 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 15 Laurier Heights 3,048 people 0 #903 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: safety C− 16 Terwillegar Towne 6,478 people 0 #907 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 17 Greenfield 3,710 people 0 #923 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 18 Bulyea Heights 3,264 people 0 #931 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 19 Secord 8,205 people 0 #942 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 20 Granville 2,994 people 0 #954 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 21 Belgravia 5,478 people 0 #958 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 22 Westbrook Estates 2,838 people 0 #982 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 23 Leger 4,108 people 0 #997 of 2,589 Strongest: schools A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: safety C− 24 River Valley Oleskiw 9,922 people 0 #1,009 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 25 Patricia Heights 4,355 people 0 #1,016 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 26 Twin Brooks 5,102 people 0 #1,021 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 28 Summerside 16,760 people 0 #1,031 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 29 Jamieson Place 3,813 people 0 #1,040 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety C− 30 Cameron Heights 3,710 people 0 #1,042 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 31 Haddow 4,026 people 0 #1,061 of 2,589 Strongest: schools A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: safety C− 32 Trumpeter Area 5,220 people 0 #1,085 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A+ · lowest: walkability D 33 Edgemont 5,059 people 0 #1,096 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 34 Ogilvie Ridge 5,218 people 0 #1,112 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 35 The Hamptons 12,008 people 0 #1,115 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 36 Windermere 14,922 people 0 #1,116 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 37 Kiniski Gardens 6,864 people 0 #1,126 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 38 Paisley 2,897 people 0 #1,156 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 39 Cy Becker 2,683 people 0 #1,175 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 40 Webber Greens 5,035 people 0 #1,176 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 41 Tamarack 6,860 people 0 #1,206 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 42 Glenridding Heights 4,388 people 0 #1,211 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 43 Charlesworth 8,135 people 0 #1,212 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 44 Wild Rose 8,534 people 0 #1,222 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 45 Maple 3,920 people 0 #1,224 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 46 Chappelle 14,815 people 0 #1,245 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 47 Rapperswill 3,639 people 0 #1,246 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 48 Larkspur 5,472 people 0 #1,248 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 49 Keswick 3,957 people 0 #1,252 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 50 Rosenthal 4,873 people 0 #1,257 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 51 Capilano 5,046 people 0 #1,264 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 52 Glastonbury 9,745 people 0 #1,284 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 53 Avonmore 2,971 people 0 #1,290 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 54 Ramsay Heights 3,434 people 0 #1,300 of 2,589 Strongest: schools A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: safety C− 55 Mactaggart 3,603 people 0 #1,318 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 56 Jackson Heights 4,195 people 0 #1,336 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 57 Walker 13,388 people 0 #1,344 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 58 South Terwillegar 8,183 people 0 #1,354 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 59 Bearspaw 5,192 people 0 #1,357 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 60 Malmo Plains 4,150 people 0 #1,365 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: safety C− 61 Rutherford 12,808 people 0 #1,374 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 62 Suder Greens 2,928 people 0 #1,398 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety C− 63 Carlton 5,502 people 0 #1,400 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools B+ · lowest: safety C− 65 North Glenora 3,693 people 0 #1,428 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: safety C− 66 Ellerslie 5,963 people 0 #1,431 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 67 Greenview 2,822 people 0 #1,434 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 68 McConachie 10,450 people 0 #1,456 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 69 Lymburn 7,231 people 0 #1,485 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 70 Ambleside 7,733 people 0 #1,486 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 71 Ormsby Place 4,412 people 0 #1,487 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 72 Cavanagh 7,300 people 0 #1,497 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 73 Meadowlark Park 2,671 people 0 #1,503 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 74 Westmount 4,961 people 0 #1,506 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: cost of living D 75 Satoo 2,517 people 0 #1,510 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 76 Silver Berry 9,439 people 0 #1,512 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 77 Allard 8,148 people 0 #1,537 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 78 Hazeldean 3,247 people 0 #1,561 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living C− 79 Lynnwood 3,452 people 0 #1,571 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 80 Elmwood 2,522 people 0 #1,578 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: safety C− 81 Laurel 15,263 people 0 #1,579 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A− · lowest: safety C− 82 Aldergrove 5,311 people 0 #1,581 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 83 Oxford 4,460 people 0 #1,599 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 84 Bisset 3,049 people 0 #1,610 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: safety C− 85 Duggan 6,247 people 0 #1,616 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 86 MacEwan 6,102 people 0 #1,630 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 87 Ottewell 8,040 people 0 #1,648 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C− 88 Sweet Grass 2,616 people 0 #1,650 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living C− 89 Crawford Plains 3,075 people 0 #1,652 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools B+ · lowest: safety C− 90 Allendale 2,951 people 0 #1,654 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 91 Canossa 3,246 people 0 #1,655 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 92 Holyrood 3,305 people 0 #1,671 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A− · lowest: safety C− 93 Riverdale 5,490 people 0 #1,693 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 94 Klarvatten 6,773 people 0 #1,704 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 95 Brintnell 6,658 people 0 #1,712 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 96 Gold Bar 2,685 people 0 #1,713 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety C− 97 La Perle 7,889 people 0 #1,726 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 98 Callaghan 4,180 people 0 #1,730 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 99 Thorncliff 3,564 people 0 #1,748 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C− 100 Cumberland 6,493 people 0 #1,749 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 101 West Meadowlark Park 5,386 people 0 #1,761 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 102 Meyonohk 2,822 people 0 #1,766 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 103 Elsinore 5,796 people 0 #1,768 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income B · lowest: safety C− 104 Ekota 2,509 people 0 #1,795 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 105 Royal Gardens 3,392 people 0 #1,796 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: cost of living D 106 Pleasantview 3,746 people 0 #1,808 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 107 Skyrattler 2,956 people 0 #1,823 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: cost of living D 108 Lago Lindo 2,963 people 0 #1,827 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 109 Ermineskin 7,483 people 0 #1,830 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 110 Minchau 2,576 people 0 #1,836 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 111 Forest Heights 4,118 people 0 #1,846 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 112 Jasper Park 3,219 people 0 #1,851 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 113 King Edward Park 8,399 people 0 #1,862 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 114 Callingwood South 7,844 people 0 #1,877 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D− 115 Baturyn 4,796 people 0 #1,880 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 116 Hollick-Kenyon 6,451 people 0 #1,881 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 117 Belle Rive 3,946 people 0 #1,884 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 118 Weinlos 3,243 people 0 #1,885 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 119 Crystallina Nera East 5,566 people 0 #1,890 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , health B · lowest: safety C− 120 Daly Grove 3,486 people 0 #1,892 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 121 Hudson 3,634 people 0 #1,896 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 122 Mayliewan 4,259 people 0 #1,904 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , health B · lowest: safety C− 123 Blue Quill 4,567 people 0 #1,905 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 124 Canora 4,799 people 0 #1,921 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 125 Hillview 5,473 people 0 #1,939 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 126 Belmead 3,970 people 0 #1,941 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 127 Glenwood 4,842 people 0 #1,954 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 128 Tweddle Place 5,211 people 0 #1,962 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 129 Bonnie Doon 6,697 people 0 #1,972 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 130 Ozerna 4,216 people 0 #1,977 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 131 Matt Berry 4,093 people 0 #1,979 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 132 Lee Ridge 2,722 people 0 #1,991 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living C− 133 Miller 3,294 people 0 #2,003 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 134 Richfield 3,456 people 0 #2,013 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C− 135 Pollard Meadows 4,361 people 0 #2,032 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: jobs & income C− 136 Kameyosek 2,761 people 0 #2,044 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 137 Meyokumin 4,069 people 0 #2,053 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 138 Griesbach 6,640 people 0 #2,063 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 139 Tipaskan 2,875 people 0 #2,067 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 140 Sakaw 3,453 people 0 #2,088 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 141 Fraser 3,973 people 0 #2,097 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: schools D 142 Albany 3,015 people 0 #2,098 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools B+ · lowest: safety C− 143 West Jasper Place 3,427 people 0 #2,101 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 144 Westview Village 6,590 people 0 #2,106 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools B+ · lowest: cost of living C− 145 Britannia Youngstown 4,616 people 0 #2,124 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 146 Queen Mary Park 7,958 people 0 #2,136 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D 148 Kernohan 3,020 people 0 #2,198 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: schools D 149 Central McDougall 4,802 people 0 #2,210 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D− 150 Eaux Claires 3,334 people 0 #2,226 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: safety C− 151 Lorelei 4,380 people 0 #2,241 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 152 Crystallina Nera West 3,150 people 0 #2,267 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , health B · lowest: safety C− 153 Kensington 3,697 people 0 #2,272 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 154 Belmont 5,299 people 0 #2,274 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: safety C− 155 Casselman 5,795 people 0 #2,276 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 156 Dunluce 6,079 people 0 #2,282 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 157 Wellington 3,314 people 0 #2,286 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 158 Athlone 3,242 people 0 #2,288 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 159 Kirkness 5,279 people 0 #2,292 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 160 Northmount 3,349 people 0 #2,339 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 161 Clareview Town Centre 3,800 people 0 #2,341 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: safety C− 162 Caernarvon 5,972 people 0 #2,354 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C− 163 Woodcroft 2,770 people 0 #2,370 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D− 164 Delwood 3,491 people 0 #2,371 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: schools C− 165 York 4,030 people 0 #2,372 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: safety C− 166 Inglewood 7,167 people 0 #2,379 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 167 Newton 2,809 people 0 #2,389 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 168 Beacon Heights 4,389 people 0 #2,397 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: schools C− 169 Virginia Park 3,431 people 0 #2,412 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 170 Carlisle 4,609 people 0 #2,413 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C− 171 Homesteader 6,059 people 0 #2,421 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: schools C− 172 Rosslyn 3,242 people 0 #2,430 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living C− 173 Kilkenny 5,481 people 0 #2,437 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living C− 174 Bannerman 5,187 people 0 #2,440 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: schools C− 175 Parkdale 4,029 people 0 #2,447 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D 176 Glengarry 3,087 people 0 #2,451 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 177 Alberta Avenue 6,097 people 0 #2,462 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D 178 Lauderdale 2,954 people 0 #2,465 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C− 179 Montrose 3,378 people 0 #2,467 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: jobs & income D 180 Calder 4,221 people 0 #2,473 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 181 Beaumaris 4,125 people 0 #2,477 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B+ · lowest: cost of living D 182 Belvedere 5,337 people 0 #2,480 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: jobs & income D 183 Eastwood 4,681 people 0 #2,483 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: jobs & income D− 184 Beverly Heights 3,252 people 0 #2,486 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 185 Delton 2,657 people 0 #2,488 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: jobs & income D 186 Evansdale 5,602 people 0 #2,495 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: jobs & income D 187 Balwin 4,092 people 0 #2,499 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 188 Killarney 4,165 people 0 #2,500 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: jobs & income D 189 Kildare 2,833 people 0 #2,502 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: jobs & income D 190 Overlanders 2,879 people 0 #2,513 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 191 Rundle Heights 5,175 people 0 #2,521 of 2,589 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: jobs & income D− 192 Westwood 3,279 people 0 #2,527 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D− Rankings
More lists for Edmonton City by city
Most historic elsewhere Photos: Strathcona, Joli Rumi (CC BY-SA 4.0 ) · Queen Alexandra, Darren Kirby (CC BY-SA 3.0 ) · Downtown, Simon Law from Montréal, QC, Canada (CC BY-SA 2.0 ), via Wikimedia Commons.
Sources: TownRatings grades: our own summary of the data, ranking Canadian towns against each other only, run #73 of 10 November 2026. Under the Statistics Canada Open Licence.
Adapted from Statistics Canada (Census of Population 2021, population estimates 2025, 2021 census boundaries) under the Statistics Canada Open Licence; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood names in some cities © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).