Home › Canada › Alberta › Edmonton › Rankings › Safest Rhatigan Ridge, #1 on this list · Photo: jasonwoodhead23 (CC BY 2.0) Edmonton · 2026 Safest neighbourhoods in Edmonton The places after the leader belong to Brookside (C−) and Parkview (C−). None of the 192 on this list grades in the A range. At the other end is Westwood, with C−. Across Canada, the same list puts Rhatigan Ridge #2,010 of 2,572. Canada’s top 100 on this list includes no neighbourhood in Edmonton. Rhatigan Ridge tops the list in Edmonton, at C−.
Safety grade: the Crime Severity Index of the police force or detachment, 2023–2025 How grades work
#1 Overall A · #223 of 2,556
Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C−
#2 Overall A · #227 of 2,556
Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C−
#3 Overall A · #245 of 2,556
Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: safety C−
All 192 neighbourhoods, ranked Best first in Edmonton; beside each place, its rank on the same list for all of Canada.
Every Edmonton list # Neighbourhood Safety Canada rank What drives it
1 Rhatigan Ridge 7,066 people C− #2,010 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 2 Brookside 3,173 people C− #2,011 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 3 Parkview 5,729 people C− #2,012 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: safety C− 4 Magrath Heights 3,728 people C− #2,013 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 5 Laurier Heights 3,048 people C− #2,014 of 2,572 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: safety C− 6 Terwillegar Towne 6,478 people C− #2,015 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 7 Greenfield 3,710 people C− #2,016 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 8 Bulyea Heights 3,264 people C− #2,017 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 9 Secord 8,205 people C− #2,018 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 10 Granville 2,994 people C− #2,019 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 11 Belgravia 5,478 people C− #2,020 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 12 Westbrook Estates 2,838 people C− #2,021 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 13 Leger 4,108 people C− #2,022 of 2,572 Strongest: schools A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: safety C− 14 River Valley Oleskiw 9,922 people C− #2,023 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 15 Patricia Heights 4,355 people C− #2,024 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 16 Twin Brooks 5,102 people C− #2,025 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 18 Summerside 16,760 people C− #2,027 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 19 Jamieson Place 3,813 people C− #2,028 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety C− 20 Cameron Heights 3,710 people C− #2,029 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 21 Glenora 6,197 people C− #2,030 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A+ · lowest: safety C− 22 Haddow 4,026 people C− #2,031 of 2,572 Strongest: schools A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: safety C− 23 Trumpeter Area 5,220 people C− #2,032 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A+ · lowest: walkability D 24 Edgemont 5,059 people C− #2,033 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 25 Ogilvie Ridge 5,218 people C− #2,034 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 26 The Hamptons 12,008 people C− #2,035 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 27 Windermere 14,922 people C− #2,036 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 28 Kiniski Gardens 6,864 people C− #2,037 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 29 Paisley 2,897 people C− #2,038 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 30 Cy Becker 2,683 people C− #2,039 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 31 Webber Greens 5,035 people C− #2,040 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 32 Tamarack 6,860 people C− #2,041 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 33 Glenridding Heights 4,388 people C− #2,042 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 34 Charlesworth 8,135 people C− #2,043 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 35 Wild Rose 8,534 people C− #2,044 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 36 Maple 3,920 people C− #2,045 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 37 Chappelle 14,815 people C− #2,046 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 38 Rapperswill 3,639 people C− #2,047 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 39 Larkspur 5,472 people C− #2,048 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 40 Keswick 3,957 people C− #2,049 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 41 Rosenthal 4,873 people C− #2,050 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 42 Capilano 5,046 people C− #2,051 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: safety C− 43 Glastonbury 9,745 people C− #2,052 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 44 Avonmore 2,971 people C− #2,053 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 45 Ramsay Heights 3,434 people C− #2,054 of 2,572 Strongest: schools A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: safety C− 46 Mactaggart 3,603 people C− #2,055 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 47 Jackson Heights 4,195 people C− #2,056 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 48 Walker 13,388 people C− #2,057 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 49 Ritchie 5,215 people C− #2,058 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living C− 50 South Terwillegar 8,183 people C− #2,059 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 51 Bearspaw 5,192 people C− #2,060 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 52 Malmo Plains 4,150 people C− #2,061 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: safety C− 53 Rutherford 12,808 people C− #2,062 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 54 Suder Greens 2,928 people C− #2,063 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety C− 55 Carlton 5,502 people C− #2,064 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools B+ · lowest: safety C− 57 North Glenora 3,693 people C− #2,066 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: safety C− 58 Ellerslie 5,963 people C− #2,067 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 59 Greenview 2,822 people C− #2,068 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 60 McConachie 10,450 people C− #2,069 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 61 Lymburn 7,231 people C− #2,070 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 62 Ambleside 7,733 people C− #2,071 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: safety C− 63 Ormsby Place 4,412 people C− #2,072 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 64 Cavanagh 7,300 people C− #2,073 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 65 Meadowlark Park 2,671 people C− #2,074 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 66 Westmount 4,961 people C− #2,075 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: cost of living D 67 Satoo 2,517 people C− #2,076 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 68 Silver Berry 9,439 people C− #2,077 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 69 Allard 8,148 people C− #2,078 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 70 Hazeldean 3,247 people C− #2,079 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living C− 71 Lynnwood 3,452 people C− #2,080 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 72 Elmwood 2,522 people C− #2,081 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: safety C− 73 Laurel 15,263 people C− #2,082 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A− · lowest: safety C− 74 Aldergrove 5,311 people C− #2,083 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 75 Oxford 4,460 people C− #2,084 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 76 Bisset 3,049 people C− #2,085 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: safety C− 77 Duggan 6,247 people C− #2,086 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 78 MacEwan 6,102 people C− #2,087 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 79 Ottewell 8,040 people C− #2,088 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C− 80 Sweet Grass 2,616 people C− #2,090 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: cost of living C− 81 Crawford Plains 3,075 people C− #2,091 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools B+ · lowest: safety C− 82 Allendale 2,951 people C− #2,092 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 83 Highlands 2,677 people C− #2,093 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 84 Canossa 3,246 people C− #2,094 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 85 Holyrood 3,305 people C− #2,095 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A− · lowest: safety C− 86 Riverdale 5,490 people C− #2,096 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 87 Klarvatten 6,773 people C− #2,097 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 88 Brintnell 6,658 people C− #2,098 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 89 Gold Bar 2,685 people C− #2,099 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income A− · lowest: safety C− 90 Wîhkwêntôwin 19,050 people C− #2,100 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 91 La Perle 7,889 people C− #2,101 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 92 Callaghan 4,180 people C− #2,102 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A · lowest: safety C− 93 Thorncliff 3,564 people C− #2,103 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C− 94 Cumberland 6,493 people C− #2,104 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: safety C− 95 West Meadowlark Park 5,386 people C− #2,105 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 96 Meyonohk 2,822 people C− #2,106 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 97 Elsinore 5,796 people C− #2,107 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , jobs & income B · lowest: safety C− 98 Ekota 2,509 people C− #2,108 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 99 Royal Gardens 3,392 people C− #2,109 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: cost of living D 100 Pleasantview 3,746 people C− #2,111 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 101 Skyrattler 2,956 people C− #2,112 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools A+ · lowest: cost of living D 102 Lago Lindo 2,963 people C− #2,113 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 103 Ermineskin 7,483 people C− #2,114 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 104 Minchau 2,576 people C− #2,115 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 105 Strathcona 8,283 people C− #2,116 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 106 Forest Heights 4,118 people C− #2,117 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 107 Jasper Park 3,219 people C− #2,118 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 108 Downtown 12,880 people C− #2,119 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 109 King Edward Park 8,399 people C− #2,120 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 110 Callingwood South 7,844 people C− #2,121 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D− 111 Baturyn 4,796 people C− #2,122 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 112 Hollick-Kenyon 6,451 people C− #2,123 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 113 Belle Rive 3,946 people C− #2,124 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 114 Weinlos 3,243 people C− #2,125 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 115 Crystallina Nera East 5,566 people C− #2,126 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , health B · lowest: safety C− 116 Daly Grove 3,486 people C− #2,127 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 117 Hudson 3,634 people C− #2,128 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 118 Mayliewan 4,259 people C− #2,129 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , health B · lowest: safety C− 119 Blue Quill 4,567 people C− #2,130 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 120 Canora 4,799 people C− #2,131 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 121 Hillview 5,473 people C− #2,132 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 122 Belmead 3,970 people C− #2,133 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 123 Glenwood 4,842 people C− #2,134 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 124 Tweddle Place 5,211 people C− #2,135 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 125 Bonnie Doon 6,697 people C− #2,136 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D 126 Ozerna 4,216 people C− #2,137 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 127 Matt Berry 4,093 people C− #2,138 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , health B+ · lowest: safety C− 128 Lee Ridge 2,722 people C− #2,139 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living C− 129 Miller 3,294 people C− #2,140 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 130 Queen Alexandra 5,106 people C− #2,141 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 131 Richfield 3,456 people C− #2,142 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C− 132 Pollard Meadows 4,361 people C− #2,143 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: jobs & income C− 133 Kameyosek 2,761 people C− #2,144 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 134 Meyokumin 4,069 people C− #2,145 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 135 Griesbach 6,640 people C− #2,146 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 136 Tipaskan 2,875 people C− #2,147 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 137 Sakaw 3,453 people C− #2,148 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 138 Fraser 3,973 people C− #2,149 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: schools D 139 Albany 3,015 people C− #2,150 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools B+ · lowest: safety C− 140 West Jasper Place 3,427 people C− #2,151 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 141 Westview Village 6,590 people C− #2,152 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , schools B+ · lowest: cost of living C− 142 Britannia Youngstown 4,616 people C− #2,153 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 143 Queen Mary Park 7,958 people C− #2,154 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D 144 Boyle Street 5,862 people C− #2,156 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D− 146 Kernohan 3,020 people C− #2,158 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: schools D 147 Sherbrooke 7,131 people C− #2,159 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 148 Central McDougall 4,802 people C− #2,160 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D− 149 Eaux Claires 3,334 people C− #2,161 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: safety C− 150 Lorelei 4,380 people C− #2,162 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 151 Crystallina Nera West 3,150 people C− #2,163 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , health B · lowest: safety C− 152 Kensington 3,697 people C− #2,164 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 153 Belmont 5,299 people C− #2,165 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: safety C− 154 Casselman 5,795 people C− #2,166 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 155 Dunluce 6,079 people C− #2,167 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 156 Wellington 3,314 people C− #2,168 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 157 Athlone 3,242 people C− #2,169 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 158 Kirkness 5,279 people C− #2,170 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 159 Northmount 3,349 people C− #2,171 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: safety C− 160 Clareview Town Centre 3,800 people C− #2,172 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: safety C− 161 Caernarvon 5,972 people C− #2,173 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C− 162 Woodcroft 2,770 people C− #2,174 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D− 163 Delwood 3,491 people C− #2,175 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: schools C− 164 York 4,030 people C− #2,176 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: safety C− 165 Inglewood 7,167 people C− #2,177 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living D− 166 Newton 2,809 people C− #2,178 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: safety C− 167 Beacon Heights 4,389 people C− #2,180 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: schools C− 168 Virginia Park 3,431 people C− #2,181 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 169 Carlisle 4,609 people C− #2,182 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C− 170 Homesteader 6,059 people C− #2,183 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: schools C− 171 Rosslyn 3,242 people C− #2,184 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: cost of living C− 172 Kilkenny 5,481 people C− #2,185 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living C− 173 Bannerman 5,187 people C− #2,186 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: schools C− 174 Parkdale 4,029 people C− #2,187 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D 175 Glengarry 3,087 people C− #2,188 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: cost of living D 176 Alberta Avenue 6,097 people C− #2,189 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D 177 McCauley 4,060 people C− #2,190 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D− 178 Lauderdale 2,954 people C− #2,191 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living C− 179 Montrose 3,378 people C− #2,192 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: jobs & income D 180 Calder 4,221 people C− #2,193 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 181 Beaumaris 4,125 people C− #2,194 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability B+ · lowest: cost of living D 182 Belvedere 5,337 people C− #2,195 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: jobs & income D 183 Eastwood 4,681 people C− #2,197 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: jobs & income D− 184 Beverly Heights 3,252 people C− #2,198 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A− · lowest: cost of living D 185 Delton 2,657 people C− #2,199 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: jobs & income D 186 Evansdale 5,602 people C− #2,200 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: jobs & income D 187 Balwin 4,092 people C− #2,201 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 188 Killarney 4,165 people C− #2,202 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: jobs & income D 189 Kildare 2,833 people C− #2,203 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: jobs & income D 190 Overlanders 2,879 people C− #2,205 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A · lowest: cost of living D 191 Rundle Heights 5,175 people C− #2,206 of 2,572 Strongest: hazard risk A+ , walkability A+ · lowest: jobs & income D− 192 Westwood 3,279 people C− #2,207 of 2,572 Strongest: walkability A+ , hazard risk A+ · lowest: jobs & income D− Rankings
More lists for Edmonton City by city
Safest elsewhere Photos: Rhatigan Ridge, jasonwoodhead23 (CC BY 2.0 ) · Brookside, Kurayba (CC BY-SA 2.0 ) · Parkview, Johntwrl (CC BY-SA 3.0 ), via Wikimedia Commons.
Sources: TownRatings grades: our own summary of the data, ranking Canadian towns against each other only, run #73 of 10 November 2026. Under the Statistics Canada Open Licence.
Adapted from Statistics Canada (Census of Population 2021, population estimates 2025, 2021 census boundaries) under the Statistics Canada Open Licence; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood names in some cities © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).