Rhatigan Ridge, #1 on this list · Photo: jasonwoodhead23 (CC BY 2.0)

Edmonton · 2026

Best neighbourhoods to live in Edmonton

Not one of Edmonton’s neighbourhoods reaches the top 100 for all of Canada. Nowhere in Edmonton does better on this list than Rhatigan Ridge, at A. Brookside is second (A) and Parkview third (A). Of the 192 on the list, 27 earn an A. The list ends with Westwood, at D. Rhatigan Ridge is #223 of 2,556 on the list for all of Canada.

Overall grade: one score from every livability grade, each neighbourhood placed on the scale of Canada’s towns How grades work

Rhatigan Ridge

7,066 people

Score 67.9·#223 of 2,556 Canadian towns

Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

Brookside

3,173 people

Score 67.7·#227 of 2,556 Canadian towns

Strongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

Parkview

5,729 people

Score 67.1·#245 of 2,556 Canadian towns

Strongest: jobs & income A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

All 192 neighbourhoods, ranked

Each neighbourhood by its overall score, best first, with its grade and national rank beside it.

Every Edmonton list

Find a town

192 neighbourhoods

#NeighbourhoodScoreGrade · national rankWhat drives it

1Rhatigan Ridge7,066 people67.9top 12.4%A#223 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

2Brookside3,173 people67.7top 12.5%A#227 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

3Parkview5,729 people67.1top 13.6%A#245 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: jobs & income A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

4Magrath Heights3,728 people66.7top 14.1%A#255 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

5Laurier Heights3,048 people66.6top 14.3%A#264 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: jobs & income A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

6Terwillegar Towne6,478 people66.5top 14.5%A#268 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

7Greenfield3,710 people65.7top 15.5%A⁻#290 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

8Bulyea Heights3,264 people65.5top 15.9%A⁻#302 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

9Secord8,205 people65.2top 16.4%A⁻#316 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

10Granville2,994 people64.9top 16.8%A⁻#332 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

11Belgravia5,478 people64.8top 16.8%A⁻#336 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

12Westbrook Estates2,838 people64.2top 17.9%A⁻#365 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

13Leger4,108 people63.9top 18.8%A⁻#383 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: schools A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

14River Valley Oleskiw9,922 people63.7top 19.3%A⁻#397 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

15Patricia Heights4,355 people63.5top 19.8%A⁻#406 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, jobs & income A·lowest: safety C⁻

16Twin Brooks5,102 people63.4top 19.8%A⁻#412 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

17The Orchards At Ellerslie6,267 people63.3top 19.8%A⁻#416 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

18Summerside16,760 people63.3top 19.9%A⁻#422 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

19Jamieson Place3,813 people63.0top 20.6%A⁻#437 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, jobs & income A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

20Cameron Heights3,710 people62.9top 20.8%A⁻#441 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

21Glenora6,197 people62.6top 21.1%A⁻#453 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, jobs & income A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

22Haddow4,026 people62.3top 21.6%A⁻#469 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: schools A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

23Trumpeter Area5,220 people61.7top 22.8%A⁻#499 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, jobs & income A⁺·lowest: walkability D

24Edgemont5,059 people61.4top 23.4%A⁻#516 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

25Ogilvie Ridge5,218 people61.1top 24.4%A⁻#538 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

26The Hamptons12,008 people61.0top 24.6%A⁻#543 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

27Windermere14,922 people61.0top 24.6%A⁻#543 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

28Kiniski Gardens6,864 people60.8top 25.1%B⁺#561 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

29Paisley2,897 people60.2top 26.3%B⁺#597 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

30Cy Becker2,683 people59.8top 27.3%B⁺#623 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, jobs & income A·lowest: safety C⁻

31Webber Greens5,035 people59.7top 27.4%B⁺#625 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

32Tamarack6,860 people59.2top 28.6%B⁺#661 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

33Glenridding Heights4,388 people59.2top 28.9%B⁺#666 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

34Charlesworth8,135 people59.2top 29.0%B⁺#668 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

35Wild Rose8,534 people58.9top 29.5%B⁺#681 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

36Maple3,920 people58.9top 29.5%B⁺#683 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

37Chappelle14,815 people58.5top 30.9%B⁺#713 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

38Rapperswill3,639 people58.5top 30.9%B⁺#714 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, cost of living B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

39Larkspur5,472 people58.5top 31.0%B⁺#719 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

40Keswick3,957 people58.4top 31.2%B⁺#724 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

41Rosenthal4,873 people58.4top 31.4%B⁺#730 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

42Capilano5,046 people58.3top 31.5%B⁺#737 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, jobs & income A·lowest: safety C⁻

43Glastonbury9,745 people57.8top 32.7%B⁺#762 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

44Avonmore2,971 people57.7top 33.0%B⁺#771 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

45Ramsay Heights3,434 people57.6top 33.1%B⁺#782 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: schools A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

46Mactaggart3,603 people57.3top 33.8%B⁺#808 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

47Jackson Heights4,195 people56.9top 34.3%B⁺#827 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

48Walker13,388 people56.8top 34.4%B⁺#839 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

49Ritchie5,215 people56.7top 34.4%B⁺#841 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living C⁻

50South Terwillegar8,183 people56.6top 34.6%B⁺#851 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

51Bearspaw5,192 people56.5top 34.7%B⁺#855 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

52Malmo Plains4,150 people56.3top 35.0%B⁺#864 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

53Rutherford12,808 people56.1top 35.5%B#877 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

54Suder Greens2,928 people55.8top 36.7%B#908 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, jobs & income A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

55Carlton5,502 people55.7top 36.7%B#910 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

56Anthony Henday South East4,960 people55.3top 38.0%B#943 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

57North Glenora3,693 people55.3top 38.1%B#947 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

58Ellerslie5,963 people55.2top 38.3%B#951 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

59Greenview2,822 people55.2top 38.4%B#955 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

60McConachie10,450 people54.9top 39.3%B#982 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

61Lymburn7,231 people54.5top 40.6%B#1,020 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

62Ambleside7,733 people54.5top 40.6%B#1,021 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

63Ormsby Place4,412 people54.5top 40.6%B#1,023 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

64Cavanagh7,300 people54.3top 40.9%B#1,035 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

65Meadowlark Park2,671 people54.1top 41.3%B#1,045 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

66Westmount4,961 people54.0top 41.6%B#1,053 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, jobs & income A·lowest: cost of living D

67Satoo2,517 people53.9top 41.6%B#1,057 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

68Silver Berry9,439 people53.9top 41.6%B#1,059 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

69Allard8,148 people53.5top 42.8%B#1,091 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

70Hazeldean3,247 people53.0top 44.2%B#1,128 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living C⁻

71Lynnwood3,452 people52.9top 44.4%B#1,141 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

72Elmwood2,522 people52.8top 44.5%B#1,150 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

73Laurel15,263 people52.8top 44.5%B#1,153 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

74Aldergrove5,311 people52.8top 44.5%B#1,155 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

75Oxford4,460 people52.3top 45.4%B⁻#1,180 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

76Bisset3,049 people52.1top 45.7%B⁻#1,195 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

77Duggan6,247 people52.0top 45.8%B⁻#1,203 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

78MacEwan6,102 people51.8top 46.4%B⁻#1,219 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

79Ottewell8,040 people51.5top 47.1%B⁻#1,241 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living C⁻

80Sweet Grass2,616 people51.4top 47.2%B⁻#1,245 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: cost of living C⁻

81Crawford Plains3,075 people51.4top 47.3%B⁻#1,247 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

82Allendale2,951 people51.4top 47.5%B⁻#1,251 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

83Highlands2,677 people51.4top 47.5%B⁻#1,252 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

84Canossa3,246 people51.4top 47.5%B⁻#1,253 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, cost of living B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

85Holyrood3,305 people51.2top 48.0%B⁻#1,272 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

86Riverdale5,490 people50.9top 48.7%B⁻#1,298 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living D

87Klarvatten6,773 people50.8top 49.1%B⁻#1,312 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, cost of living B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

88Brintnell6,658 people50.7top 49.4%B⁻#1,321 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

89Gold Bar2,685 people50.6top 49.4%B⁻#1,322 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, jobs & income A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

90Wîhkwêntôwin19,050 people50.6top 49.4%B⁻#1,324 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

91La Perle7,889 people50.4top 49.6%B⁻#1,337 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

92Callaghan4,180 people50.3top 49.9%B⁻#1,342 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A·lowest: safety C⁻

93Thorncliff3,564 people50.1bottom 49.3%B⁻#1,364 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living C⁻

94Cumberland6,493 people50.1bottom 49.3%B⁻#1,365 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, cost of living B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

95West Meadowlark Park5,386 people50.0bottom 48.9%B⁻#1,379 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

96Meyonohk2,822 people49.9bottom 48.7%B⁻#1,386 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

97Elsinore5,796 people49.9bottom 48.6%B⁻#1,390 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, jobs & income B·lowest: safety C⁻

98Ekota2,509 people49.4bottom 47.5%B⁻#1,425 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

99Royal Gardens3,392 people49.4bottom 47.5%B⁻#1,427 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

100Pleasantview3,746 people49.2bottom 47.1%B⁻#1,444 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

101Skyrattler2,956 people49.1bottom 46.7%B⁻#1,463 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

102Lago Lindo2,963 people49.0bottom 46.2%B⁻#1,473 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

103Ermineskin7,483 people48.9bottom 46.1%B⁻#1,477 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

104Minchau2,576 people48.8bottom 45.9%B⁻#1,484 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

105Strathcona8,283 people48.8bottom 45.8%B⁻#1,488 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D⁻

106Forest Heights4,118 people48.4bottom 45.0%B⁻#1,503 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: cost of living D

107Jasper Park3,219 people48.3bottom 44.7%C⁺#1,512 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

108Downtown12,880 people48.0bottom 43.8%C⁺#1,529 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

109King Edward Park8,399 people47.9bottom 43.6%C⁺#1,536 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living D

110Callingwood South7,844 people47.6bottom 42.6%C⁺#1,557 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: jobs & income D⁻

111Baturyn4,796 people47.6bottom 42.5%C⁺#1,560 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

112Hollick-Kenyon6,451 people47.6bottom 42.5%C⁺#1,561 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

113Belle Rive3,946 people47.5bottom 42.5%C⁺#1,564 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

114Weinlos3,243 people47.5bottom 42.5%C⁺#1,564 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

115Crystallina Nera East5,566 people47.5bottom 42.4%C⁺#1,569 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, health B·lowest: safety C⁻

116Daly Grove3,486 people47.4bottom 42.3%C⁺#1,574 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

117Hudson3,634 people47.3bottom 42.0%C⁺#1,580 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

118Mayliewan4,259 people47.3bottom 41.9%C⁺#1,588 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, health B·lowest: safety C⁻

119Blue Quill4,567 people47.3bottom 41.9%C⁺#1,589 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

120Canora4,799 people47.0bottom 40.9%C⁺#1,611 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

121Hillview5,473 people46.8bottom 40.1%C⁺#1,634 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

122Belmead3,970 people46.8bottom 40.0%C⁺#1,635 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

123Glenwood4,842 people46.6bottom 39.3%C⁺#1,654 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

124Tweddle Place5,211 people46.4bottom 38.9%C⁺#1,664 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

125Bonnie Doon6,697 people46.2bottom 38.5%C⁺#1,674 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

126Ozerna4,216 people46.1bottom 38.2%C⁺#1,682 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

127Matt Berry4,093 people46.1bottom 38.2%C⁺#1,684 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, health B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

128Lee Ridge2,722 people45.9bottom 37.3%C⁺#1,702 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living C⁻

129Miller3,294 people45.6bottom 37.1%C⁺#1,717 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

130Queen Alexandra5,106 people45.5bottom 37.0%C⁺#1,720 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D⁻

131Richfield3,456 people45.4bottom 36.3%C⁺#1,735 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living C⁻

132Pollard Meadows4,361 people45.0bottom 35.0%C⁺#1,761 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: jobs & income C⁻

133Kameyosek2,761 people44.7bottom 34.1%C#1,783 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living D

134Meyokumin4,069 people44.6bottom 33.5%C#1,797 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living D

135Griesbach6,640 people44.4bottom 32.9%C#1,812 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

136Tipaskan2,875 people44.4bottom 32.7%C#1,819 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

137Sakaw3,453 people44.0bottom 32.0%C#1,844 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: cost of living D

138Fraser3,973 people43.9bottom 31.6%C#1,855 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: schools D

139Albany3,015 people43.9bottom 31.6%C#1,856 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools B⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

140West Jasper Place3,427 people43.7bottom 31.5%C#1,860 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D⁻

141Westview Village6,590 people43.7bottom 31.5%C#1,865 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, schools B⁺·lowest: cost of living C⁻

142Britannia Youngstown4,616 people43.3bottom 30.3%C#1,894 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

143Queen Mary Park7,958 people42.9bottom 29.6%C#1,913 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: jobs & income D

144Boyle Street5,862 people41.9bottom 27.0%C#1,976 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: jobs & income D⁻

145Edmonton Energy And Technology Park5,225 people41.6bottom 25.6%C#2,008 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, health B·lowest: safety C⁻

146Kernohan3,020 people41.4bottom 25.3%C#2,015 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: schools D

147Sherbrooke7,131 people41.3bottom 24.9%C⁻#2,026 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

148Central McDougall4,802 people41.2bottom 24.6%C⁻#2,030 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: jobs & income D⁻

149Eaux Claires3,334 people40.8bottom 23.8%C⁻#2,054 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

150Lorelei4,380 people40.5bottom 22.8%C⁻#2,077 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

151Crystallina Nera West3,150 people40.1bottom 21.3%C⁻#2,114 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, health B·lowest: safety C⁻

152Kensington3,697 people40.0bottom 21.1%C⁻#2,121 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

153Belmont5,299 people39.9bottom 21.1%C⁻#2,124 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

154Casselman5,795 people39.9bottom 21.1%C⁻#2,126 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

155Dunluce6,079 people39.7bottom 21.0%C⁻#2,134 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

156Wellington3,314 people39.6bottom 20.8%C⁻#2,140 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

157Athlone3,242 people39.6bottom 20.7%C⁻#2,142 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

158Kirkness5,279 people39.5bottom 20.6%C⁻#2,151 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

159Northmount3,349 people38.5bottom 18.4%C⁻#2,223 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: safety C⁻

160Clareview Town Centre3,800 people38.5bottom 18.3%C⁻#2,226 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

161Caernarvon5,972 people38.3bottom 17.7%C⁻#2,242 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living C⁻

162Woodcroft2,770 people37.8bottom 16.8%C⁻#2,264 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living D⁻

163Delwood3,491 people37.7bottom 16.8%C⁻#2,266 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: schools C⁻

164York4,030 people37.7bottom 16.8%C⁻#2,267 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: safety C⁻

165Inglewood7,167 people37.6bottom 16.5%C⁻#2,275 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living D⁻

166Newton2,809 people37.3bottom 16.0%C⁻#2,286 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: safety C⁻

167Beacon Heights4,389 people37.1bottom 15.7%C⁻#2,296 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: schools C⁻

168Virginia Park3,431 people36.8bottom 14.7%D#2,317 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

169Carlisle4,609 people36.7bottom 14.7%D#2,318 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living C⁻

170Homesteader6,059 people36.4bottom 14.2%D#2,330 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: schools C⁻

171Rosslyn3,242 people36.2bottom 13.8%D#2,341 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: cost of living C⁻

172Kilkenny5,481 people35.8bottom 13.5%D#2,350 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: cost of living C⁻

173Bannerman5,187 people35.8bottom 13.4%D#2,353 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: schools C⁻

174Parkdale4,029 people35.6bottom 13.0%D#2,363 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: jobs & income D

175Glengarry3,087 people35.4bottom 12.9%D#2,369 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: cost of living D

176Alberta Avenue6,097 people35.1bottom 12.0%D#2,384 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: jobs & income D

177McCauley4,060 people35.1bottom 11.9%D#2,387 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: jobs & income D⁻

178Lauderdale2,954 people34.9bottom 11.7%D#2,392 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living C⁻

179Montrose3,378 people34.9bottom 11.6%D#2,394 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: jobs & income D

180Calder4,221 people34.5bottom 10.9%D#2,403 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living D

181Beaumaris4,125 people34.4bottom 10.6%D#2,409 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability B⁺·lowest: cost of living D

182Belvedere5,337 people34.3bottom 10.6%D#2,412 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: jobs & income D

183Eastwood4,681 people34.1bottom 10.2%D#2,417 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: jobs & income D⁻

184Beverly Heights3,252 people33.9bottom 10.0%D#2,423 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁻·lowest: cost of living D

185Delton2,657 people33.8bottom 9.8%D#2,427 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: jobs & income D

186Evansdale5,602 people33.2bottom 9.4%D#2,436 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: jobs & income D

187Balwin4,092 people33.0bottom 9.0%D#2,443 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living D

188Killarney4,165 people33.0bottom 9.0%D#2,444 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: jobs & income D

189Kildare2,833 people32.9bottom 9.0%D#2,446 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: jobs & income D

190Overlanders2,879 people32.1bottom 7.8%D#2,464 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A·lowest: cost of living D

191Rundle Heights5,175 people31.1bottom 6.6%D#2,478 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: hazard risk A⁺, walkability A⁺·lowest: jobs & income D⁻

192Westwood3,279 people30.2bottom 5.7%D#2,489 of 2,556 nationallyStrongest: walkability A⁺, hazard risk A⁺·lowest: jobs & income D⁻

Rankings

More lists for Edmonton

All lists Best places to live Most affordable Safest Best schools Healthiest Jobs & income Most walkable Lowest hazard risk Civic life Highest incomes Most historic Most bilingual Youngest Oldest

City by city

Best places to live elsewhere

Canada Toronto Montréal Calgary Edmonton Ottawa Winnipeg Brampton Mississauga Vancouver Surrey Hamilton Québec Halifax London Laval Markham Vaughan Kitchener Saskatoon Gatineau Burnaby Windsor Longueuil Regina

Photos: Rhatigan Ridge, jasonwoodhead23 (CC BY 2.0) · Brookside, Kurayba (CC BY-SA 2.0) · Parkview, Johntwrl (CC BY-SA 3.0), via Wikimedia Commons.

Sources: TownRatings grades: our own summary of the data, ranking Canadian towns against each other only, run #73 of 10 November 2026. Under the Statistics Canada Open Licence.

Adapted from Statistics Canada (Census of Population 2021, population estimates 2025, 2021 census boundaries) under the Statistics Canada Open Licence; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood names in some cities © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).