Guest, Sign inJoin
Mono ON 2Photo: P199 · CC BY-SA 3.0
B+Hazard risk Grade
Hazards in Mono · NRCan, Health Canada, CWFIS

Mono is on Canada’s flood inventory: 4 listed, led by Toronto Regional Conservation Authority

Since 1986 almost nothing has burned near Mono: 0% of the land within 25 km, or 0.000% a year. Earthquakes matter little: NRCan’s model puts building losses at $0.012 a year per $1,000 of value, against $0.030 for the typical town. Radon is higher than usual: 11% of tested homes in the survey area topped the guideline, against 6.6% for the typical town. Hazard risk gives Mono a grade of B+, from earthquakes and radon alone.

In brief

What stands out about Mono’s hazards

For Mono, from NRCan’s seismic model, Health Canada’s radon survey, the national burned-area record and the flood map inventory.

By hazard

What Mono faces

Each hazard against its own yardstick; meters run from low to high on that yardstick.

Not on this page: flood zones and homes in them, past floods, landslides, industrial sites and storm surge: Canada has no national open source for them by town.
Hazard risk Grade

Hazard risk in Mono: B+

Earthquake risk and radon make Mono’s grade; wildfire can only lower it, never raise it, and flood studies are listed but not scored.

Earthquake risk ($0.012)Better than 75% of Canadian towns
Radon (11%)Better than 35% of Canadian towns
Wildfire (one-sided) (Low)Not counted: it would have raised the grade
Flood study (Yes)Shown, never graded

Its place: #603 of 866 in Ontario and #1,382 of 2,589 Canadian towns.

How sure: The seismic figure is a long-run average from NRCan’s model, not a prediction. The burned-area record misses fires under about 10 ha and most grass and farm fires.

Wildfire

Wildfire is rare near Mono: 0% of the land within 25 km burned since 1986, 0% within 5 km

Past fire around Mono’s homes, from the national burned-area record, with the fuel within 5 km.

0.000%
of land within 25 km burned a year
–
last burn within 25 km

Forty years of fire maps put Mono at 0.000% a year, low next to the typical Canadian town’s 0.000%.

Land within 5 and 25 km of Mono’s homes
Burned, 5 km0%
Burned, 25 km0%
Forest, 5 km22%
Forest, 25 km15%
Grass, 5 km52%

The ring nearest Mono is the most wooded: 22% forest fuel within 5 km against 15% within 25 km.

Shares of land within 5 and 25 km of populated blocks: burned at least once in 1986–2025 (CWFIS burned-area composite), forest fuel and grass (fire behaviour fuel types, 2026, 250 m grid).

Burn rate a year, towns in Ontario · highest of 871

Sioux Lookout0.16%
Red Lake0.14%
Geraldton0.12%
Sudbury, Unorganized, North Part0.09%
Kenora, Unorganized0.08%
Deep River0.07%
French River / Rivière des Français0.07%
Mono0.000%

Little or nothing burns around Mono in a typical year; 638 of the 871 towns in Ontario share that, and Sioux Lookout leads at 0.16%.

Each bar: the yearly average share of land within 25 km of a town’s homes that burned, 1986–2025 (CWFIS); the seven highest towns of 2,500 people or more.

Canada’s 2,610 towns by wildfire band
92%LowMono
5.4%Moderate
1.9%High
0.2%Very high

The low band holds 92% of Canada’s 2,610 towns, and Mono sits at its very bottom; only 7.5% are above it.

Bands of the yearly burn rate: low under 0.05%, moderate under 0.25%, high under 1%, very high 1% or more; towns of 2,500 people or more.

Fire danger and active fires (CWFIS)

Canadian Wildland Fire Information System: National Burned Area Composite 1986–2025 and fire behaviour fuel types (2026), Natural Resources Canada. Measured within 25 km and 5 km of each populated dissemination area; past fire, not a forecast.

Flood studies

Flooding around Mono is mapped in 4 studies, the newest by Toronto Regional Conservation Authority

What Canada’s Flood Map Inventory lists for Mono: who studied flooding and where to see their maps.

4 studies on the inventory touch Mono, the newest Toronto Regional Conservation Authority’s from 2021, and their areas can be large, so they say maps exist, not that the town floods.

StudyByYearStatus
Toronto Floodline ConsolidationToronto Regional Conservation Authority2021final
Grand River Regulatory FloodplainGrand River Conservation Authority2018final
Mill CreekCredit Valley Conservation Authority2017final · not public
Credit RiverCredit Valley Conservation Authority2007final · not public

Towns with a flood study on file

Ont.69%
Canada58%

Flood maps are common in Ontario: 69% of towns have one, against 58% nationally, and Mono is among them.

NRCan Canada Flood Map Inventory: a study footprint touching the town’s boundary; towns of 2,500 people or more.

Flood studies by decade
12000s
22010s
12020s

The busiest decade for flood studies around Mono was the 2010s (2 of 4); they run from the 2000s to the 2020s.

Study dates as the NRCan inventory lists them, one count per study touching Mono.

Flood studies don’t enter the grade; they are listed so you can open the official map for Mono.

The inventory’s own caution (NRCan): “The Canada Flood Map (CFM) does not include every flood hazard map in Canada and may be incomplete or contain inaccuracies. It should not be relied upon as the official source of flood mapping information. Furthermore, if a map appears to be missing, this does not necessarily mean that the area has never been mapped. For the official version of a map, updated information, or confirmation of applicable regulations, please contact the local authority responsible for flood mapping.”

Natural Resources Canada, Canada Flood Map Inventory; links go to each study’s owner.

Earthquakes

Low seismic risk in Mono: $0.012 per $1,000 of buildings a year

Expected yearly building losses from earthquakes, from Natural Resources Canada’s model.

$0.012
a year per $1,000 of building value
$25K
expected building losses a year, all told

At $0.012 per $1,000, Mono carries 0.4 times the typical Canadian town’s earthquake risk ($0.030): low.

Shaking damage a year per $1,000 of building value

Alexandria$0.21
Median, Ont.$0.043
Median, Canada$0.030
Mono$0.012

Mono’s $0.012 sits under the median in Ontario, $0.043, and well under Alexandria’s $0.21.

NRCan seismic risk model (2022): mean yearly building loss per $1,000 of value; medians of towns of 2,500 people or more.

Canada’s 2,611 towns by shaking damage a year
14%under $0.01
21%$0.01+Mono
15%$0.02+
20%$0.03+
4.9%$0.05+
20%$0.10+
5.4%$0.25+
0.8%$0.60+

Mono is in the lower part of Canada’s range for earthquake risk; 84% of the 2,611 towns are higher.

Each column: the share of Canada’s towns of 2,500 people or more in that range of yearly loss per $1,000 (NRCan, 2022).

For Mono the model prices shaking damage to buildings, nothing more.

Earthquakes Canada

Natural Resources Canada, Canada’s Seismic Risk Model (2022), by census subdivision (2016 boundaries; a few 2021 subdivisions take their residents’ mean).

Radon

11% of homes tested around Mono are over the radon guideline

Long-term radon tests in homes across the survey area, against Health Canada’s guideline. · Area-wide: radon tests, counted over the Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Health Unit

39 Bq/m³
median test
99
homes tested

Radon runs above the typical Canadian town (6.6%) in Mono’s area, at 11%.

Tested homes over 200 Bq/m³

Mono11%
Median, Ont.4%
Median, Canada6.6%

Over 600 Bq/m³

Mono2%
Median, Ont.0%
Median, Canada0%

More homes top the guideline around Mono (11%) than in the typical town in Ontario (4%); 2% went over 600.

Health Canada radon survey (2009–2011), by 2007 health region; medians of towns of 2,500 people or more.

Canada’s 2,611 towns by share of tests over 200 Bq/m³
Under 5%37%
5–10%37%
10–20% · Mono22%
20–30%3.1%
30% or more1.5%

More high tests than most: Mono sits in a band that only 22% of Canada’s 2,611 towns share, with 4.6% above.

Each bar: the share of Canada’s towns of 2,500 people or more whose survey area had that share of tests over 200 Bq/m³.

Health Canada advises testing every home, Mono’s included, whatever the area’s figure.

Take Action on Radon

Health Canada, Cross-Canada Survey of Radon Concentrations in Homes (2009–2011).

Warnings

Where to get warnings in Mono

Alerts for Mono come from Environment and Climate Change Canada and, for emergencies, Alert Ready.

AlertWhat it means
WarningSevere weather is happening or about to: act now.
WatchConditions favour severe weather: be ready.
AdvisoryWeather that is less severe but could disrupt the day.
Special weather statementUnusual weather worth knowing about.
Special air quality statementPoor air, often wildfire smoke.

Alert Ready carries evacuation orders for Mono to phones; CWFIS shows the day’s fire danger.

Weather alerts (ECCC) · Alert Ready · Fire danger and active fires (CWFIS)

Neighbours

Hazards in the places around Mono

Wildfire band, earthquake risk, radon and flood studies for each place nearby.

OrangevilleAmaranthShelburneEast GarafraxaOrangevilleAmaranthShelburneEast GarafraxaMono
TownWildfireQuake $/1,000RadonFlood study
MonoLow$0.01211%Yes
Orangeville
33,070 · 6.9 km
Low$0.01211%Yes
Amaranth
4,808 · 12 km
Low$0.01911%Yes
Shelburne
10,767 · 17 km
Low$0.01911%None listed
East Garafraxa
2,976 · 18 km
Low$0.01811%Yes

None of the places around has more fire nearby than Mono (low); Orangeville comes closest (low).

Radon is the survey area’s figure, so neighbours in one area share it.

Be ready

Get ready for what Mono faces

Practical steps for Mono’s hazards, most pressing first.

Radon
  • Test for three months in winter.
  • Over 200 Bq/m³: fix it.
  • Kits are cheap; pros test too.
Take Action on Radon
When the river rises
  • Never drive through floodwater.
  • Move papers and medicines upstairs.
  • Ask whether your street is mapped.
Alert Ready
Wildfire season
  • Clear needles and wood nearby.
  • Keep a grab-and-go bag ready.
  • In smoke, stay in; filter air.
FireSmart Canada
Before you buy or rent in Mono
  • Has it had a radon test?
  • Check the address on the flood map.
  • Are flood and wildfire insured?
How to read these numbers

What this data can and can’t tell you

  • Earthquakes are modelled. The earthquake figure is an expected loss, not a forecast, worked out by NRCan for each census subdivision, Mono’s included.
  • Flood studies aren’t flood zones. A study’s area can be a whole watershed or province, so being on the inventory says a map exists, not that a home in Mono floods.
  • Radon is a survey. The radon share comes from about 14,000 long-term home tests in 2009–2011, pooled for now by the 2007 health region Mono sits in.
  • Wildfire counts one way. Burned land within 25 km of where people live, averaged over 1986–2025 and checked for fuel near homes, is the measure; it looks back, not ahead, and only ever counts against Mono.

Get Prepared (Public Safety Canada)

Questions about flooding and hazards in Mono

Is radon a problem in Mono?

11% of the 99 homes Health Canada tested around Mono topped the guideline; your own house needs its own test.

Does Mono flood?

Mono’s area has been studied for flooding, and the owner’s map shows which streets lie in a zone; the grade leaves flood out.

How big is the earthquake risk in Mono?

NRCan’s model expects shaking to cost buildings in Mono $0.012 a year for every $1,000 of their value, on average over many years.

Is Mono at risk of wildfire?

The burned-area record shows next to nothing around Mono (0% within 25 km since 1986), so its band is low.

How is Mono’s Hazard risk Grade worked out?

Hazard risk gives Mono B+, weighing earthquakes and radon and counting wildfire only against it.

Seismic risk: Natural Resources Canada. Radon: Health Canada. Wildfire: Canadian Wildland Fire Information System. Flood studies: Natural Resources Canada, Canada Flood Map Inventory. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence – Canada.

Sources: NRCan, Canada’s Seismic Risk Model 2022 · Health Canada, Cross-Canada Survey of Radon Concentrations in Homes · CWFIS, National Burned Area Composite and FBP fuel types · NRCan, Canada Flood Map Inventory. Under the Statistics Canada Open Licence.

Adapted from Statistics Canada (Census of Population 2021, population estimates 2025, 2021 census boundaries) under the Statistics Canada Open Licence; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood names in some cities © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).