Home › Canada › New Brunswick › Rankings › Lowest hazard risk Hampton, #1 on this list · Photo: Earth Science and Remote Sensing Unit , Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center (Public domain) New Brunswick · 2026 Towns with the lowest hazard risk in New Brunswick Second place goes to Simonds, at C+, and third to Sussex, at C+. The A range holds none of the 60 on this list. Bottom of the list: Tracadie, with D−. On the national list, Hampton is #1,666 of 2,589. The national top 100 holds no place from New Brunswick. Leading New Brunswick on this list is Hampton, at B−.
Hazard risk grade: earthquake loss and radon, with high wildfire as a ceiling How grades work
#1 New Brunswick · 3,268 people B− Hazard riskOverall B− · #1,325 of 2,556
Strongest: safety A , cost of living B+ · lowest: walkability D
#2 New Brunswick · 4,263 people C+ Hazard riskOverall C+ · #1,727 of 2,556
Strongest: safety A , cost of living B · lowest: walkability D
#3 New Brunswick · 2,742 people C+ Hazard riskOverall D · #2,455 of 2,556
Strongest: cost of living B− , hazard risk C+ · lowest: walkability C−
All 60, ranked in New Brunswick Best first in New Brunswick; beside each place, its rank on the same list for all of Canada.
Every New Brunswick list # Town Hazard risk Canada rank What drives it
1 Hampton 3,268 people B− #1,666 of 2,589 Strongest: safety A , cost of living B+ · lowest: walkability D 2 Simonds 4,263 people C+ #1,775 of 2,589 Strongest: safety A , cost of living B · lowest: walkability D 3 Sussex 2,742 people C+ #1,776 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living B− , hazard risk C+ · lowest: walkability C− 4 Kingston 3,577 people C+ #1,831 of 2,589 Strongest: safety A , cost of living B · lowest: health D 5 Hampton 4,754 people C+ #1,832 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living B , jobs & income B− · lowest: health D 6 Studholm 3,668 people C+ #1,833 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living A− , hazard risk C+ · lowest: walkability D 7 Quispamsis 20,240 people C+ #1,848 of 2,589 Strongest: safety A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: health D 8 Grand Bay-Westfield 5,202 people C+ #1,849 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living A , jobs & income A− · lowest: health C− 9 Rothesay 12,626 people C+ #1,853 of 2,589 Strongest: safety A+ , jobs & income A · lowest: health C− 10 Saint John 79,371 people C+ #1,854 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk C+ · lowest: health C 11 Sussex 4,994 people C+ #1,893 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , hazard risk C+ · lowest: jobs & income C− 12 Memramcook 5,616 people C #2,102 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income B , safety B · lowest: walkability D 13 Kingsclear 3,158 people C #2,236 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living A− , jobs & income B+ · lowest: walkability D 14 Saint Marys 5,701 people C #2,237 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income B+ , cost of living B · lowest: walkability D 15 Bright 3,648 people C #2,238 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living B− , safety C · lowest: health C− 16 Sackville 6,572 people C #2,246 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , health B− · lowest: hazard risk C 17 Starlight Village 5,108 people C #2,249 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A− · lowest: walkability C− 18 Douglas 6,840 people C #2,250 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income B , cost of living B− · lowest: walkability D 19 Salisbury 3,806 people C− #2,293 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living B+ , health C · lowest: walkability D 20 Woodstock 6,260 people C− #2,294 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability B , jobs & income C+ · lowest: safety D 21 Riverview 22,614 people C− #2,303 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability B+ · lowest: safety C− 22 Coverdale 5,167 people C− #2,304 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income B− , cost of living B− · lowest: walkability D 23 Fredericton 74,655 people C− #2,310 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , jobs & income A− · lowest: hazard risk C− 24 Shediac 9,849 people C− #2,314 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability B+ , jobs & income C+ · lowest: cost of living C− 25 Moncton 12,238 people C− #2,323 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , cost of living B · lowest: walkability D 26 Dieppe 35,986 people C− #2,324 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , walkability B− · lowest: safety C− 27 Dundas 4,733 people C− #2,325 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living A− , safety C+ · lowest: walkability D 29 Dalhousie 3,255 people C− #2,339 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A− , cost of living B+ · lowest: health D− 30 Cocagne 2,982 people C− #2,345 of 2,589 Strongest: safety A , cost of living B · lowest: hazard risk C− 31 Salisbury 2,585 people C− #2,346 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability B+ , jobs & income B− · lowest: hazard risk C− 32 Saint George 2,675 people C− #2,350 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living B , jobs & income C · lowest: walkability D 33 Shediac 5,699 people C− #2,353 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income B+ , cost of living B · lowest: hazard risk C− 34 Cap-Pelé 3,092 people C− #2,354 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income B , cost of living C+ · lowest: hazard risk C− 35 New Maryland 4,455 people C− #2,357 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living A · lowest: hazard risk C− 36 Wellington 3,458 people C− #2,389 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living A+ , safety A · lowest: walkability D 37 Wakefield 2,749 people C− #2,390 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A− , cost of living B · lowest: hazard risk C− 38 Atholville 3,346 people C− #2,391 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living A− , walkability C+ · lowest: health D 39 New Maryland 3,198 people C− #2,397 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , cost of living A− · lowest: walkability D 40 Bouctouche 2,678 people C− #2,398 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability B− , health C+ · lowest: hazard risk C− 41 Moncton 102,378 people C− #2,404 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , jobs & income B · lowest: hazard risk C− 42 Lincoln 8,093 people C− #2,405 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income B+ , cost of living B · lowest: walkability D 43 Campbellton 7,485 people C− #2,407 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A , cost of living C+ · lowest: safety C− 44 Grand Manan 2,648 people C− #2,412 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A , cost of living A− · lowest: safety C− 45 Caraquet 4,572 people D #2,426 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability B , jobs & income B− · lowest: hazard risk D 46 Miramichi 19,402 people D #2,437 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living B− , walkability B− · lowest: hazard risk D 47 Shippagan 4,721 people D #2,439 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living A , health B− · lowest: walkability D− 48 St. Stephen 4,876 people D #2,461 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A− , cost of living C+ · lowest: safety D 49 Alnwick 3,767 people D #2,475 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living A , walkability C− · lowest: health D− 51 Edmundston 18,174 people D #2,481 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability B , cost of living B− · lowest: hazard risk D 52 Haut-Madawaska 4,098 people D #2,491 of 2,589 Strongest: safety A , cost of living A− · lowest: hazard risk D 53 Beresford 6,543 people D #2,494 of 2,589 Strongest: safety A+ , cost of living B+ · lowest: hazard risk D 54 Shippagan 3,073 people D #2,495 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability A− , cost of living B · lowest: hazard risk D 55 Beresford 4,389 people D #2,499 of 2,589 Strongest: safety A+ , cost of living B · lowest: hazard risk D 56 Bathurst 13,331 people D #2,503 of 2,589 Strongest: walkability B+ , health B− · lowest: hazard risk D 57 Bathurst 4,840 people D #2,506 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living B+ , jobs & income B− · lowest: walkability D 58 Burton 5,424 people D #2,534 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living A , jobs & income B · lowest: hazard risk D 59 Oromocto 9,451 people D #2,538 of 2,589 Strongest: jobs & income A+ , cost of living B− · lowest: hazard risk D 60 Tracadie 16,453 people D− #2,543 of 2,589 Strongest: cost of living B , health B− · lowest: hazard risk D− Rankings
More lists for New Brunswick Province by province
Lowest hazard risk elsewhere Photos: Hampton, Earth Science and Remote Sensing Unit , Lyndon B. Johnson S… (Public domain ) · Simonds, Earth Science and Remote Sensing Unit , Lyndon B. Johnson S… (Public domain ) · Sussex, Earth Science and Remote Sensing Unit , Lyndon B. Johnson S… (Public domain ), via Wikimedia Commons.
Sources: TownRatings grades: our own summary of the data, ranking Canadian towns against each other only, run #73 of 10 November 2026. Under the Statistics Canada Open Licence.
Adapted from Statistics Canada (Census of Population 2021, population estimates 2025, 2021 census boundaries) under the Statistics Canada Open Licence; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood names in some cities © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).