Guest, Sign inJoin

Post to Reading

We’ll email a one-tap link to publish your post. No password, and nothing is public until you click it.
Already a member? Sign in
Benson east of Lind, ReadingPhoto: Nyttend · Public domain
C+Hazard risk
Natural hazards in Reading · FEMA

FEMA puts Reading’s expected hazard damage per building above that of 64% of U.S. towns, mostly from river and rain flooding

On FEMA’s National Risk Index, Reading gets a C+ for hazard risk: higher expected damage per building than 64% of U.S. towns, #894 of 993 in Ohio. Most of that expected damage is river and rain flooding (86%). Flood insurance has paid 13 claims here since 1979.

Graded on FEMA’s expected yearly building damage per dollar of building value (NRI v1.20, December 2025), weighted by where residents live; flood claims are shown, not graded. How hazard risk is graded

more than 64%of U.S. townsLess damageMoreExpected yearly damage per dollar of building, vs. the 21,298 U.S. towns we grade#894 of 993 in Ohio
By hazard

What Reading faces

Each hazard’s share of the building damage FEMA expects here, and how its rate compares with the rest of the country.

River and rain flooding

86%of expected building damage
Above average · higher than 78% of U.S. census tracts
Recorded about 5 times a year in the area

Tornadoes

10%of expected building damage
Well above average · higher than 88% of U.S. census tracts
Smaller shares here
 Earthquakes Strong wind Hail Ice storms Hurricanes Wildfire Winter storms Cold waves Heat waves Landslides Lightning
FEMA models no building damage here
Coastal floodingAvalanchesTsunamisVolcanic activity
People, not buildings.Counting harm to people as well as buildings, FEMA’s model puts heat waves at 8% of Reading’s expected losses. Heat waves do little damage to buildings (0.0%), so they aren’t part of the grade.

Shares are of FEMA’s expected building damage, the measure the grade uses; ranks compare each hazard’s building-damage rate with all 85,154 U.S. census tracts. In FEMA’s terms, river and rain flooding is FEMA’s “Inland Flooding” (rivers and streams overflowing their banks, or rain overwhelming drainage). FEMA defines coastal flooding as high or rising tides and storm surge, so surge damage is counted there. Drought isn’t listed: FEMA counts its losses in crops only.

Flood risk changes street by street. Check a specific address on FEMA’s flood map, and ask about flood insurance before you buy.
Hazard risk grade

What’s behind Reading’s grade

River and rain flooding is 86% of the building damage FEMA expects in Reading, and Reading’s rate of river and rain flooding damage is higher than 78% of U.S. census tracts. Next is tornadoes at 10% (higher than 88% of U.S. census tracts).

Where Reading sits
Reading
Least damageMiddleMost damage

C+ #894 of 993 in Ohio; higher expected damage per building than 64% of U.S. towns (21,298).

Reading’s residents live in 3 census tracts; FEMA’s figures are combined by where they live.

What drives the damage to buildings
River and rain flooding86%Tornadoes10%Everything else4%

The typical Ohio town has lower expected damage than 79% of U.S. towns; within the state, Reading has more expected damage per building than 90% of Ohio towns.

In dollars, FEMA expects about $3.8M a year in losses across Reading: $2.9M to buildings, the rest to people and crops.

A small-area figure. Reading covers 3 census tracts, combined by where residents live. FEMA’s model is an average year for today’s buildings, not a record: the claims and disasters below are the record.

How TownRatings grades hazard risk →

Flood insurance claims

Does Reading flood? Sometimes: 13 flood claims since 1979

Every paid claim on a federal flood insurance policy in Reading, from FEMA’s records: 2.4 per 1,000 homes, fewer than 57% of the 13,809 U.S. towns with a flood insurance record.

Paid flood claims, by year
1979: 2 claims1980: 0 claims1981: 0 claims1982: 0 claims1983: 0 claims1984: 0 claims1985: 0 claims1986: 0 claims1987: 0 claims1988: 0 claims1989: 0 claims1990: 0 claims1991: 0 claims1992: 0 claims1993: 2 claims1994: 0 claims1995: 0 claims1996: 1 claim1997: 0 claims1998: 0 claims1999: 0 claims2000: 0 claims2001: 3 claims2002: 0 claims2003: 0 claims2004: 0 claims2005: 0 claims2006: 0 claims2007: 0 claims2008: 4 claims2009: 0 claims2010: 0 claims2011: 0 claims2012: 0 claims2013: 0 claims2014: 0 claims2015: 0 claims2016: 0 claims2017: 0 claims2018: 1 claim2019: 0 claims2020: 0 claims2021: 0 claims2022: 0 claims2023: 0 claims2024: 0 claims2025: 0 claims2026: 0 claims197920012008
19792026
Biggest named events
  • The March storm4 claims · $15K
13
paid claims since 1979
$84K
paid to owners
2
homes flooded more than once
$6K
average claim
Homes that flooded again and again
FEMA “severe repetitive loss” (0)Flooded 2+ times
of homes in flood zones are insured
of all homes are insured
No community discount

Reading isn’t in FEMA’s Community Rating System, which cuts flood insurance up to 45% in towns that do extra flood-proofing.

Insurance rates: Hamilton County.
Disasters

3 federal disasters brought FEMA money to Reading

Disasters that paid out in Reading itself (aid to households or repair grants to the City of Reading), newest first, with that year’s flood claims.

  1. 2008Severe Wind Storm Associated with Tropical Depression Ike$123K to the City of Reading for repairs4 flood claims paid that year
  2. 2004Snow$30K to the City of Reading for repairs
  3. 2001Severe Storms and Flooding$44K to the City of Reading for repairs3 flood claims paid that year
Disasters declared, by decade
Paid out in ReadingHamilton County only

Hamilton County has had 16 natural disasters declared by the President since 1953, most often severe storms, then floods. Not counted: the 2005 Hurricane Katrina evacuee emergency, which covered counties that took in evacuees.

Were you here?

Old photos of Reading after a storm or flood belong in the town’s history. Add one, or share what you remember below.

Add to the Reading archive →
Next door

Reading and its neighbors

Reading is 8th of the 8 graded towns here, from least expected damage per building to most. Tap a town to see its hazards.

Lowest fifthSecondMiddleFourthHighest fifth
TownHazard riskMostly (buildings)Flood claims
Blue AshA+less damage than 97%river and rain flooding3
Sycamore TownshipAless damage than 88%river and rain flooding6
EvendaleA−less damage than 82%river and rain flooding20
AmberleyA−less damage than 81%river and rain flooding17
CincinnatiA−less damage than 78%river and rain flooding723
DillonvaleB+less damage than 67%river and rain flooding1
LocklandC+more damage than 62%river and rain flooding1
ReadingC+more damage than 64%river and rain flooding13
Arlington Heights—981 residents; we grade 1,000+

Hazard risk = FEMA’s expected yearly building damage per dollar of building value, vs. the 21,298 U.S. towns we grade; the map is shaded by fifths of the same scale. Flood claims = paid federal flood insurance claims on record.

Be ready

Get ready for what Reading faces

A short kit for the hazards that drive the building damage here, what to check before you buy, and where neighbors get alerts.

When the river rises
  • Turn around at flooded roads: a foot of moving water can carry off a car.
  • Flood insurance usually takes 30 days to start, so buy it before the forecast.
  • Keep papers and medicines up high, in a grab-and-go bag.
More from Ready.gov ↗
Tornado warnings
  • Pick your spot now: the lowest floor, an inside room, no windows.
  • A watch means be ready; a warning means take cover now.
  • Keep shoes and a flashlight by the bed.
More from Ready.gov ↗
Before you buy or rent
  • Look up the address on FEMA’s flood map.
  • Ask the seller or landlord whether it has ever flooded, and what flood insurance costs there.
  • Get a flood insurance quote early: policies usually start 30 days after you buy.
When a storm is coming
Forecast and alertsWeather →911, the nearest ERSafety →

Know where neighbors sign up for alerts? Add it to the Handbook so everyone has it.

Questions about natural hazards in Reading

Is Reading at risk for natural disasters?

On FEMA’s National Risk Index, Reading has higher expected damage per building than 64% of U.S. towns: C+ for hazard risk, #894 of 993 in Ohio. Most of the expected damage is river and rain flooding (86%) and tornadoes (10%). This is FEMA’s model of an average year for today’s buildings, not a forecast.

Does Reading flood?

Flood insurance has paid 13 claims in Reading since 1979, $84K in all, or 2.4 per 1,000 homes, fewer than 57% of U.S. towns with a flood insurance record. 2 properties have flooded more than once. The most claims came from March storm (4).

Is Reading in a flood zone?

Flood zones are drawn street by street, so the answer depends on the address: look it up on FEMA’s flood map. In Hamilton County, 24% of homes in mapped flood zones carry federal flood insurance, and 0.4% of all homes do.

How much is flood insurance in Reading?

FEMA’s Community Rating System list shows no discount for Reading’s flood program. Premiums depend on the building; policies usually start 30 days after you buy, so get a quote early.

What was the biggest storm in Reading?

By FEMA money that reached Reading, Severe Wind Storm Associated with Tropical Depression Ike (2008): $123K to the City of Reading for repairs. By flood claims, March storm: 4 paid, $15K.

Is Reading at risk from river and rain flooding?

It is the largest share of the building damage FEMA expects here (86%), and Reading’s rate for it is higher than 78% of U.S. census tracts.

Storm stories

Memories, warnings and help from neighbors in Reading.

Town Square →
Start the conversation

Sources: FEMA National Risk Index v1.20 (December 2025), census-tract table, combined by where Reading’s residents lived in the 2020 census; OpenFEMA: NFIP redacted claims, multiple-loss properties, community status book and residential penetration rates, housing assistance (owners and renters), public assistance funded projects, hazard mitigation properties and disaster declarations. Homes: Census ACS 2020–24. Preparedness tips: Ready.gov. FEMA’s model is an average of expected damage, not a forecast. How hazard risk is graded.