FrançaisGuest, Sign inJoin
Mont Bleu (collines d'Oka à Kanesatake) 2018-07-08Photo: P. Davignon · CC BY-SA 4.0
AHealth Grade
Health in Kanesatake · CCHS 2023/2024, Statistics Canada

Few places match Kanesatake for health: it beats 89% of Canadian towns

Across the region, 60% of adults say their health is very good or excellent; Quebec as a whole manages 57%. The town’s own part is the trip to care, and Kanesatake’s is long: 16 km to a hospital on average, against 3.7 km typical. Kanesatake is a First Nations reserve: a Health grade is possible, an overall grade and a ranking are not. People on reserves are outside the survey’s sample: the figures here are the surrounding region’s, and don’t describe Kanesatake itself. Kanesatake grades A for health.

Very good or excellent health
60%
adults, age-standardised
Quebec: 57% · Measured across the Région des Laurentides: very good or excellent health, chronic conditions, smokers and life expectancy
Chronic conditions
13%
arthritis, diabetes, high blood pressure: average share
Quebec: 14%
Smokers
11%
daily or occasional, age-standardised
Quebec: 12%
Life expectancy
82.2
at birth, 2022/2024
women 83.7 · men 80.8
Nearest hospital
16 km
residents’ average, straight line
the typical Canadian town: 3.7 km
What stands out · In brief

What stands out about health in Kanesatake

Hospital care at a distance

Distance is Kanesatake’s own health question: 0% of residents live beyond 30 km of a hospital, and the trip from its centre is 17 km. Getting care ↓

Upbeat about their health

Even once age is allowed for, 8.0 points more adults here call their health very good or excellent than in the typical town’s region (58% as answered). Health survey ↓

Less chronic illness

High blood pressure (19%) and diabetes (8.1%) keep the region’s chronic-condition figure below the typical Canadian town’s. Conditions and habits ↓

Survey and life expectancy: the health region (Statistics Canada). Distances and deprivation: the town’s own areas.

Health Grade

Kanesatake grades A for health

Each input ranked against Canadian towns of 2,500 or more: the region’s four, the town’s distance to a hospital.

Very good or excellent health (60%)Better than 89% of Canadian towns
Chronic conditions (13%)Better than 98% of Canadian towns
Smokers (11%)Better than 80% of Canadian towns
Life expectancy (82.2)Better than 77% of Canadian towns
Distance to a hospital (16 km)Better than 36% of Canadian towns

The region’s four figures and the town’s distance to a hospital are each ranked against Canadian towns of 2,500 or more, then averaged.

How the grade works

Health is graded as a regional score, labelled as such: very good or excellent self-rated health, chronic conditions (arthritis, diabetes and high blood pressure averaged) and smoking from the Canadian Community Health Survey, each age-standardised so an older region isn’t marked down for age alone, and life expectancy at birth, all for the health region. The residents’ average distance to a hospital is the one input measured for the town itself, so towns in one region can still differ.

Getting care

From Kanesatake, a hospital is 16 km away on average

Straight-line distances from each part of Kanesatake, weighted by who lives there.

Hospital
16 km
residents’ average distance
the typical Canadian town: 3.7 km
Clinic
9.0 km
community health centre or clinic, residents’ average
Pharmacy
1.9 km
residents’ average distance
1.5 within 3 km of a typical home
More than 30 km from a hospital
0%
share of residents
Emergency
911
police, fire, ambulance; 811 for health advice in most provinces

Kanesatake is further out than the provincial norm of 5.3 km in Quebec, and than the typical Canadian town at 3.7 km.

Hospitals and clinics: Statistics Canada, Open Database of Healthcare Facilities. Pharmacies: © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL). Straight-line distances from each dissemination area, weighted by its 2021 population.

Health survey

About as many rate their health highly here as in Quebec: 58% and 56%

The survey’s answers for the region as given, each beside the province’s (the tick).

Share of adults, as answered · 2023/2024

Health very good or excellent
58%
Health fair or poor
11%
Mental health very good or excellent
66%
Mental health fair or poor
8.9%
Most days quite a bit stressful
20%
Strong sense of belonging
52%
Satisfied with life
91%
Quebec

Mental health is no outlier: 66% say very good or excellent (Quebec: 64%) and 20% live with stressful days.

Canadian Community Health Survey 2023/2024 (Statistics Canada table 13-10-0972), adults 18 and over, as published.

Conditions and habits

19% of the region’s adults have high blood pressure and 8.1% diabetes

Long-term conditions and habits as the region’s adults reported them; the tick marks the province.

Conditions and weight · 2023/2024

High blood pressure
19%
Arthritis
18%
Diabetes
8.1%
Obese (self-reported)
29%
Mood disorder
9.4%
Anxiety disorder
11%

Habits · 2023/2024

Smoke daily or now and then
11%
Smoke every day
8.4%
Heavy drinking
23%
Flu shot in the past year
29%
Quebec

On weight the region is ordinary for Quebec: 29% report obesity, the province 29%.

Canadian Community Health Survey 2023/2024 (table 13-10-0972), as published, not adjusted for age; obesity from reported height and weight. The anxiety disorder figure is the 2021/2022 estimate: Statistics Canada found the latest too unreliable to publish here.

For its deprivation

Ahead of regions as deprived by 1.0 years of life

Every town shares its health region’s figures, so this compares 102 regions; the one holding Kanesatake’s lies above the line.

646872768084882345Eastern Urban Zone: 80.2 (women 82.1, men 78.2)Eastern Rural Zone: 78.6 (women 80.8, men 76.4)Central Zone: 79.0 (women 80.5, men 77.4)Western Zone: 78.5 (women 81.1, men 76.0)Labrador-Grenfell Zone: 77.1 (women 79.2, men 74.6)Prince Edward Island: 81.2 (women 83.3, men 79.1)Zone 1 - Western: 80.0 (women 82.5, men 77.6)Zone 2 - Northern: 79.3 (women 81.5, men 77.1)Zone 3 - Eastern: 78.8 (women 80.9, men 76.6)Zone 4 - Central: 81.4 (women 83.4, men 79.3)Zone 1 (Moncton area): 81.5 (women 83.5, men 79.5)Zone 2 (Saint John area): 79.3 (women 81.1, men 77.3)Zone 3 (Fredericton area): 80.1 (women 81.9, men 78.2)Zone 4 (Edmundston area): 79.1 (women 80.7, men 77.3)Zone 5 (Campbellton area): 79.0 (women 82.3, men 75.3)Zone 6 (Bathurst area): 80.2 (women 82.7, men 77.8)Zone 7 (Miramichi area): 78.9 (women 82.0, men 75.7)Région du Bas-Saint-Laurent: 81.7 (women 83.1, men 80.3)Région du Saguenay—Lac-Saint-Jean: 81.8 (women 83.2, men 80.4)Région de la Capitale-Nationale: 82.9 (women 84.7, men 81.1)Région de la Mauricie et du Centre-du-Québec: 81.6 (women 83.3, men 79.9)Région de l'Estrie: 82.9 (women 84.8, men 81.0)Région de Montréal: 83.4 (women 85.5, men 81.2)Région de l'Outaouais: 80.7 (women 82.2, men 79.1)Région de l'Abitibi-Témiscamingue: 79.5 (women 81.6, men 77.6)Région de la Côte-Nord: 79.4 (women 82.1, men 77.0)Région du Nord-du-Québec: 78.1 (women 78.5, men 77.6)Région de la Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine: 79.9 (women 81.6, men 78.2)Région de la Chaudière-Appalaches: 82.8 (women 84.4, men 81.3)Région de Laval: 84.1 (women 85.7, men 82.4)Région de Lanaudière: 82.0 (women 83.7, men 80.3)Région des Laurentides: 82.2 (women 83.7, men 80.8)Région de la Montérégie: 82.5 (women 84.2, men 80.8)Région du Nunavik: 65.2 (women 70.3, men 60.7)Région des Terres-Cries-de-la-Baie-James: 76.8 (women 79.1, men 73.1)The District of Algoma Health Unit: 77.9 (women 80.4, men 75.6)Brant County Health Unit: 80.4 (women 82.6, men 78.2)Durham Regional Health Unit: 82.6 (women 84.7, men 80.5)Grey Bruce Health Unit: 81.3 (women 83.6, men 78.9)Haldimand-Norfolk Health Unit: 79.6 (women 81.9, men 77.6)Haliburton, Kawartha, Pine Ridge District Health Unit: 81.0 (women 83.0, men 79.0)Halton Regional Health Unit: 84.9 (women 86.5, men 83.2)City of Hamilton Health Unit: 81.2 (women 83.5, men 79.0)Hastings and Prince Edward Counties Health Unit: 79.8 (women 81.8, men 77.8)Chatham-Kent Health Unit: 78.6 (women 80.8, men 76.3)Kingston, Frontenac and Lennox and Addington Health Unit: 81.8 (women 83.9, men 79.5)Lambton Health Unit: 80.0 (women 82.2, men 77.8)Leeds, Grenville and Lanark District Health Unit: 81.2 (women 83.3, men 79.2)Middlesex-London Health Unit: 81.9 (women 84.2, men 79.6)Niagara Regional Area Health Unit: 81.2 (women 83.6, men 78.8)North Bay Parry Sound District Health Unit: 80.0 (women 82.6, men 77.6)Northwestern Health Unit: 73.7 (women 75.2, men 72.3)Huron Perth Health Unit: 81.7 (women 83.7, men 79.7)City of Ottawa Health Unit: 83.7 (women 85.7, men 81.6)Peel Regional Health Unit: 85.3 (women 87.2, men 83.3)Peterborough County—City Health Unit: 80.5 (women 82.8, men 78.1)Porcupine Health Unit: 77.3 (women 80.1, men 74.6)Renfrew County and District Health Unit: 81.0 (women 83.0, men 78.7)The Eastern Ontario Health Unit: 81.0 (women 83.0, men 78.9)Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit: 81.5 (women 83.5, men 79.5)Sudbury and District Health Unit: 79.1 (women 82.0, men 76.3)Thunder Bay District Health Unit: 76.5 (women 79.0, men 74.1)Timiskaming Health Unit: 77.0 (women 80.3, men 73.6)Waterloo Health Unit: 82.8 (women 84.9, men 80.7)Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Health Unit: 82.4 (women 84.5, men 80.2)Windsor-Essex County Health Unit: 81.3 (women 83.5, men 79.2)York Regional Health Unit: 86.3 (women 87.9, men 84.6)Oxford Elgin St. Thomas Health Unit: 80.6 (women 83.0, men 78.2)City of Toronto Health Unit: 84.7 (women 87.2, men 82.0)Winnipeg-Churchill Health Region: 80.0 (women 82.5, men 77.5)Prairie Mountain Health Region: 78.8 (women 81.2, men 76.6)Interlake-Eastern Health Region: 78.5 (women 81.3, men 76.0)Northern Health Region: 68.5 (women 70.5, men 66.9)Southern Health Region: 80.7 (women 82.9, men 78.7)Far North: 70.0 (women 72.8, men 67.3)North Central West: 76.6 (women 79.8, men 73.7)North Central East: 77.0 (women 79.6, men 74.5)Saskatoon: 81.4 (women 83.4, men 79.2)South West: 79.9 (women 82.5, men 77.5)South East: 78.6 (women 80.8, men 76.5)Regina: 80.2 (women 82.3, men 78.0)South Zone: 78.7 (women 80.6, men 76.8)Calgary Zone: 83.0 (women 85.0, men 80.9)Central Zone: 79.1 (women 81.7, men 76.6)Edmonton Zone: 81.2 (women 83.6, men 78.8)North Zone: 78.3 (women 80.9, men 76.1)East Kootenay Health Service Delivery Area: 80.5 (women 82.7, men 78.1)Kootenay-Boundary Health Service Delivery Area: 79.5 (women 82.8, men 76.5)Okanagan Health Service Delivery Area: 81.0 (women 84.1, men 78.2)Thompson/Cariboo Health Service Delivery Area: 78.8 (women 81.8, men 76.0)Fraser East Health Service Delivery Area: 80.0 (women 82.9, men 77.2)Fraser North Health Service Delivery Area: 84.4 (women 86.6, men 82.1)Fraser South Health Service Delivery Area: 83.2 (women 85.8, men 80.7)Richmond Health Service Delivery Area: 86.8 (women 89.0, men 84.4)Vancouver Health Service Delivery Area: 83.3 (women 86.5, men 80.2)North Shore/Coast Garibaldi Health Service Delivery Area: 84.3 (women 86.3, men 82.3)South Vancouver Island Health Service Delivery Area: 82.7 (women 84.9, men 80.5)Central Vancouver Island Health Service Delivery Area: 79.8 (women 82.6, men 77.1)North Vancouver Island Health Service Delivery Area: 79.5 (women 82.3, men 76.9)Northwest Health Service Delivery Area: 77.0 (women 79.2, men 75.0)Northern Interior Health Service Delivery Area: 76.6 (women 79.5, men 74.0)Northeast Health Service Delivery Area: 76.9 (women 79.5, men 74.4)Kanesatake’s region 82.2
Situational vulnerability: residents’ average quintile, 1 least to 5 most deprivedLife expectancy at birth (years)

Deprivation explains much of the gap between regions (correlation −0.83 over 102 of them), yet Kanesatake’s region beats it: 82.2 years against the 81.2 the trend gives a score of 2.9. It outlives all 10 of its nearest neighbours on the index, whose median is 80.9. Its towns’ household income, about $81,000, sits below most regions’ while its life expectancy sits above; across regions it is the deprivation index, not income, that follows lives (income’s correlation: 0.14).

Life expectancy: Statistics Canada table 13-10-0988, 2022/2024, by health region. Deprivation: Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation 2021 (situational vulnerability), averaged over each region’s towns by their residents; income: 2021 Census median household income, averaged the same way. The averages and the line are TownRatings calculations.

The wider area

Longest and shortest lives among the 18 regions in Quebec

What Statistics Canada publishes above the town: life expectancy for each health region in Quebec, and the deprivation index for the town’s own areas.

82.2
years at birth, 2022/2024
20.3
more years expected at 65
7th
longest of 18 regions in Quebec

Life expectancy at birth by health region · 2022/2024

Région de Laval84.1
Région de Montréal83.4
Région de la Capitale-Nationale82.9
Région de l'Estrie82.9
Région de la Chaudière-Appalaches82.8
Région de la Montérégie82.5
Région des Laurentides82.2
Région de Lanaudière82.0
Région du Saguenay—Lac-Saint-Jean81.8
Région du Bas-Saint-Laurent81.7
Région de la Mauricie et du Centre-du-Québec81.6
Région de l'Outaouais80.7
Région de la Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine79.9
Région de l'Abitibi-Témiscamingue79.5
Région de la Côte-Nord79.4
Région du Nord-du-Québec78.1
Région des Terres-Cries-de-la-Baie-James76.8
Région du Nunavik65.2

Life expectancy in Quebec runs from 65.2 to 84.1; this region sits 7th of the 18.

Life expectancy: Statistics Canada table 13-10-0988, three-year estimate 2022/2024, by health region.

Neighbours

Health in the places around Kanesatake

The places around, with the distance to a hospital and their regions’ figures. Tap a town for its health page.

ABCD
TownHospitalVery good healthLife exp.Health
Kanesatake16 km60%82.2A
Oka
3.7 km
15 km60%82.2A
Hudson
3.8 km
21 km55%82.5B+
Saint-Placide
9.0 km
18 km60%82.2A
Saint-Lazare
9.4 km
17 km55%82.5A−
Vaudreuil-sur-le-Lac
9.5 km
16 km55%82.5A−
Saint-Joseph-du-Lac
10.0 km
6.4 km60%82.2A+

Not every neighbour shares the region: Hudson’s life expectancy is 82.5, this region’s 82.2. Saint-Joseph-du-Lac is the closest to care, 6.4 km to Kanesatake’s 16 km.

How to read these numbers

What this data can and can’t tell you

  • Regional figures. The survey figures and life expectancy are published for the health region, so every town in it shares them and only the distances are Kanesatake’s own.
  • What counts as a hospital. The facilities database merges provincial lists of different vintages; its hospitals include some with no emergency department, and a few are placed by postal code.
  • Distances are straight lines. They run from where residents live, not along roads, so they understate a drive; each dissemination area counts by its 2021 population.
  • Adjusted for age. The grade’s three survey shares are age-standardised to Canada’s adults, so an older region isn’t marked down for age alone, while the survey charts show answers as given.

Questions about health in Kanesatake

How is Kanesatake’s Health Grade worked out?

It will once Canada’s single grading run is done, measured on the region’s survey and life expectancy and on how far Kanesatake’s homes are from a hospital, against the typical Canadian town. Reserves get no overall grade, and the survey skips them, so these regional figures describe the people around it.

How healthy is Kanesatake?

On every regional measure, the region does better than the typical Canadian town. Chronic conditions there average 13% across arthritis, diabetes and high blood pressure.

How far is Kanesatake from a hospital?

Residents of Kanesatake have a clinic 9.0 km away on average and a pharmacy 1.9 km away, in straight lines.

What is the life expectancy in Kanesatake?

Life expectancy comes by health region: 83.7 for women, 80.8 for men around Kanesatake (2022/2024).

Sources: Statistics Canada, Canadian Community Health Survey 2023/2024 (13-10-0972) · Statistics Canada, life expectancy 2022/2024 (13-10-0988) · Statistics Canada, health regions 2023 (82-402-X) · Statistics Canada, Open Database of Healthcare Facilities · pharmacies © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL). Under the Statistics Canada Open Licence.

Adapted from Statistics Canada (Census of Population 2021, population estimates 2025, 2021 census boundaries) under the Statistics Canada Open Licence; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood names in some cities © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).