Guest, Sign inJoin
ISS022-E-70339 - View of EarthPhoto: Earth Science and Remote Sensing Unit , Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center · Public domain
AHealth Grade
Health in Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet · CCHS 2023/2024, Statistics Canada

Health in Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet beats 91% of Canadian towns

Across the region, 59% of adults say their health is very good or excellent; British Columbia as a whole manages 50%. Closer to home, a hospital is 71 km from the average resident of Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet, and 100% live more than 30 km away. Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet grades A for health.

Very good or excellent health
59%
adults, age-standardised
British Columbia: 50% · Measured across the North Shore/Coast Garibaldi Health Service Delivery Area: very good or excellent health, chronic conditions, smokers and life expectancy
Chronic conditions
12%
arthritis, diabetes, high blood pressure: average share
British Columbia: 15%
Smokers
6.5%
daily or occasional, age-standardised
British Columbia: 8.9%
Life expectancy
84.3
at birth, 2022/2024
women 86.3 · men 82.3
Nearest hospital
71 km
residents’ average, straight line
the typical Canadian town: 3.7 km
What stands out · In brief

What stands out about health in Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet

Fewer smokers

Around Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet, only 3.7% of adults smoke daily, part of a smoking rate lower than most Canadian towns’ regions. Conditions and habits ↓

Hospital care at a distance

Residents of Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet live much further from a hospital than in the typical Canadian town (73 km from its centre of population), and 100% are more than 30 km away. Getting care ↓

A long-lived region

Life expectancy in the region around Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet runs 2.8 years ahead of the typical Canadian town’s, and at 65 people can expect 22.6 more years (2022/2024). The wider area ↓

Long-term conditions run low

High blood pressure (16%) and diabetes (4%) keep the region’s chronic-condition figure below the typical Canadian town’s. Conditions and habits ↓

Survey and life expectancy: the health region (Statistics Canada). Distances and deprivation: the town’s own areas.

Health Grade

Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet grades A for health

Each input ranked against Canadian towns of 2,500 or more: the region’s four, the town’s distance to a hospital.

Very good or excellent health (59%)Better than 87% of Canadian towns
Chronic conditions (12%)Better than almost every Canadian town
Smokers (6.5%)Better than almost every Canadian town
Life expectancy (84.3)Better than almost every Canadian town
Distance to a hospital (71 km)Better than 2% of Canadian towns

The region’s four figures and the town’s distance to a hospital are each ranked against Canadian towns of 2,500 or more, then averaged.

How the grade works

Health is graded as a regional score, labelled as such: very good or excellent self-rated health, chronic conditions (arthritis, diabetes and high blood pressure averaged) and smoking from the Canadian Community Health Survey, each age-standardised so an older region isn’t marked down for age alone, and life expectancy at birth, all for the health region. The residents’ average distance to a hospital is the one input measured for the town itself, so towns in one region can still differ.

Conditions and habits

16% of the region’s adults have high blood pressure and 4% diabetes

Long-term conditions and habits as the region’s adults reported them; the tick marks the province.

Conditions and weight · 2023/2024

High blood pressure
16%
Arthritis
20%
Diabetes
4%
Obese (self-reported)
23%
Mood disorder
15%
Anxiety disorder
12%

Habits · 2023/2024

Smoke daily or now and then
6.5%
Smoke every day
3.7%
Heavy drinking
23%
British Columbia

At 23%, self-reported obesity is near British Columbia’s 25%. At 23%, heavy drinking beats the provincial 19%.

Canadian Community Health Survey 2023/2024 (table 13-10-0972), as published, not adjusted for age; obesity from reported height and weight. The anxiety disorder figure is the 2021/2022 estimate: Statistics Canada found the latest too unreliable to publish here.

Getting care

From Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet, a hospital is 71 km away on average

Straight-line distances from each part of Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet, weighted by who lives there.

Hospital
71 km
residents’ average distance
the typical Canadian town: 3.7 km
Clinic
37 km
community health centre or clinic, residents’ average
Pharmacy
18 km
residents’ average distance
0.2 within 3 km of a typical home
More than 30 km from a hospital
100%
share of residents
Emergency
911
police, fire, ambulance; 811 for health advice in most provinces

Residents of Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet travel further than most of the province: the typical town in British Columbia is 4.4 km from a hospital, the typical Canadian town 3.7 km.

Hospitals and clinics: Statistics Canada, Open Database of Healthcare Facilities. Pharmacies: © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL). Straight-line distances from each dissemination area, weighted by its 2021 population.

The wider area

Life expectancy across the 16 health regions in British Columbia

What Statistics Canada publishes above the town: life expectancy for each health region in British Columbia, and the deprivation index for the town’s own areas.

84.3
years at birth, 2022/2024
22.6
more years expected at 65
3rd
longest of 16 regions in British Columbia

Life expectancy at birth by health region · 2022/2024

Richmond Health Service Delivery Area86.8
Fraser North Health Service Delivery Area84.4
North Shore/Coast Garibaldi Health Service Delivery Area84.3
Vancouver Health Service Delivery Area83.3
Fraser South Health Service Delivery Area83.2
South Vancouver Island Health Service Delivery Area82.7
Okanagan Health Service Delivery Area81.0
East Kootenay Health Service Delivery Area80.5
Fraser East Health Service Delivery Area80.0
Central Vancouver Island Health Service Delivery Area79.8
Kootenay-Boundary Health Service Delivery Area79.5
North Vancouver Island Health Service Delivery Area79.5
Thompson/Cariboo Health Service Delivery Area78.8
Northwest Health Service Delivery Area77.0
Northeast Health Service Delivery Area76.9
Northern Interior Health Service Delivery Area76.6

Of the 16 health regions in British Columbia, 3rd place goes to this one, between a low of 76.6 and a high of 86.8.

Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation · national quintile, 1 least to 5 most deprived

Residential instability3.3
Economic dependency1.0
Ethno-cultural composition2.3
Situational vulnerability2.9

These four scores average the national quintile of the areas where Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet’s residents live; they carry no weight in the grade.

Life expectancy: Statistics Canada table 13-10-0988, three-year estimate 2022/2024, by health region.

For its deprivation

Deprivation predicts more: the region falls 1.4 years short of the trend

One dot per health region, 102 in all, since life expectancy and the index are published for regions; Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet’s dot is marked, under the line.

646872768084882345Eastern Urban Zone: 80.2 (women 82.1, men 78.2)Eastern Rural Zone: 78.6 (women 80.8, men 76.4)Central Zone: 79.0 (women 80.5, men 77.4)Western Zone: 78.5 (women 81.1, men 76.0)Labrador-Grenfell Zone: 77.1 (women 79.2, men 74.6)Prince Edward Island: 81.2 (women 83.3, men 79.1)Zone 1 - Western: 80.0 (women 82.5, men 77.6)Zone 2 - Northern: 79.3 (women 81.5, men 77.1)Zone 3 - Eastern: 78.8 (women 80.9, men 76.6)Zone 4 - Central: 81.4 (women 83.4, men 79.3)Zone 1 (Moncton area): 81.5 (women 83.5, men 79.5)Zone 2 (Saint John area): 79.3 (women 81.1, men 77.3)Zone 3 (Fredericton area): 80.1 (women 81.9, men 78.2)Zone 4 (Edmundston area): 79.1 (women 80.7, men 77.3)Zone 5 (Campbellton area): 79.0 (women 82.3, men 75.3)Zone 6 (Bathurst area): 80.2 (women 82.7, men 77.8)Zone 7 (Miramichi area): 78.9 (women 82.0, men 75.7)Région du Bas-Saint-Laurent: 81.7 (women 83.1, men 80.3)Région du Saguenay—Lac-Saint-Jean: 81.8 (women 83.2, men 80.4)Région de la Capitale-Nationale: 82.9 (women 84.7, men 81.1)Région de la Mauricie et du Centre-du-Québec: 81.6 (women 83.3, men 79.9)Région de l'Estrie: 82.9 (women 84.8, men 81.0)Région de Montréal: 83.4 (women 85.5, men 81.2)Région de l'Outaouais: 80.7 (women 82.2, men 79.1)Région de l'Abitibi-Témiscamingue: 79.5 (women 81.6, men 77.6)Région de la Côte-Nord: 79.4 (women 82.1, men 77.0)Région du Nord-du-Québec: 78.1 (women 78.5, men 77.6)Région de la Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine: 79.9 (women 81.6, men 78.2)Région de la Chaudière-Appalaches: 82.8 (women 84.4, men 81.3)Région de Laval: 84.1 (women 85.7, men 82.4)Région de Lanaudière: 82.0 (women 83.7, men 80.3)Région des Laurentides: 82.2 (women 83.7, men 80.8)Région de la Montérégie: 82.5 (women 84.2, men 80.8)Région du Nunavik: 65.2 (women 70.3, men 60.7)Région des Terres-Cries-de-la-Baie-James: 76.8 (women 79.1, men 73.1)The District of Algoma Health Unit: 77.9 (women 80.4, men 75.6)Brant County Health Unit: 80.4 (women 82.6, men 78.2)Durham Regional Health Unit: 82.6 (women 84.7, men 80.5)Grey Bruce Health Unit: 81.3 (women 83.6, men 78.9)Haldimand-Norfolk Health Unit: 79.6 (women 81.9, men 77.6)Haliburton, Kawartha, Pine Ridge District Health Unit: 81.0 (women 83.0, men 79.0)Halton Regional Health Unit: 84.9 (women 86.5, men 83.2)City of Hamilton Health Unit: 81.2 (women 83.5, men 79.0)Hastings and Prince Edward Counties Health Unit: 79.8 (women 81.8, men 77.8)Chatham-Kent Health Unit: 78.6 (women 80.8, men 76.3)Kingston, Frontenac and Lennox and Addington Health Unit: 81.8 (women 83.9, men 79.5)Lambton Health Unit: 80.0 (women 82.2, men 77.8)Leeds, Grenville and Lanark District Health Unit: 81.2 (women 83.3, men 79.2)Middlesex-London Health Unit: 81.9 (women 84.2, men 79.6)Niagara Regional Area Health Unit: 81.2 (women 83.6, men 78.8)North Bay Parry Sound District Health Unit: 80.0 (women 82.6, men 77.6)Northwestern Health Unit: 73.7 (women 75.2, men 72.3)Huron Perth Health Unit: 81.7 (women 83.7, men 79.7)City of Ottawa Health Unit: 83.7 (women 85.7, men 81.6)Peel Regional Health Unit: 85.3 (women 87.2, men 83.3)Peterborough County—City Health Unit: 80.5 (women 82.8, men 78.1)Porcupine Health Unit: 77.3 (women 80.1, men 74.6)Renfrew County and District Health Unit: 81.0 (women 83.0, men 78.7)The Eastern Ontario Health Unit: 81.0 (women 83.0, men 78.9)Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit: 81.5 (women 83.5, men 79.5)Sudbury and District Health Unit: 79.1 (women 82.0, men 76.3)Thunder Bay District Health Unit: 76.5 (women 79.0, men 74.1)Timiskaming Health Unit: 77.0 (women 80.3, men 73.6)Waterloo Health Unit: 82.8 (women 84.9, men 80.7)Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Health Unit: 82.4 (women 84.5, men 80.2)Windsor-Essex County Health Unit: 81.3 (women 83.5, men 79.2)York Regional Health Unit: 86.3 (women 87.9, men 84.6)Oxford Elgin St. Thomas Health Unit: 80.6 (women 83.0, men 78.2)City of Toronto Health Unit: 84.7 (women 87.2, men 82.0)Winnipeg-Churchill Health Region: 80.0 (women 82.5, men 77.5)Prairie Mountain Health Region: 78.8 (women 81.2, men 76.6)Interlake-Eastern Health Region: 78.5 (women 81.3, men 76.0)Northern Health Region: 68.5 (women 70.5, men 66.9)Southern Health Region: 80.7 (women 82.9, men 78.7)Far North: 70.0 (women 72.8, men 67.3)North Central West: 76.6 (women 79.8, men 73.7)North Central East: 77.0 (women 79.6, men 74.5)Saskatoon: 81.4 (women 83.4, men 79.2)South West: 79.9 (women 82.5, men 77.5)South East: 78.6 (women 80.8, men 76.5)Regina: 80.2 (women 82.3, men 78.0)South Zone: 78.7 (women 80.6, men 76.8)Calgary Zone: 83.0 (women 85.0, men 80.9)Central Zone: 79.1 (women 81.7, men 76.6)Edmonton Zone: 81.2 (women 83.6, men 78.8)North Zone: 78.3 (women 80.9, men 76.1)East Kootenay Health Service Delivery Area: 80.5 (women 82.7, men 78.1)Kootenay-Boundary Health Service Delivery Area: 79.5 (women 82.8, men 76.5)Okanagan Health Service Delivery Area: 81.0 (women 84.1, men 78.2)Thompson/Cariboo Health Service Delivery Area: 78.8 (women 81.8, men 76.0)Fraser East Health Service Delivery Area: 80.0 (women 82.9, men 77.2)Fraser North Health Service Delivery Area: 84.4 (women 86.6, men 82.1)Fraser South Health Service Delivery Area: 83.2 (women 85.8, men 80.7)Richmond Health Service Delivery Area: 86.8 (women 89.0, men 84.4)Vancouver Health Service Delivery Area: 83.3 (women 86.5, men 80.2)North Shore/Coast Garibaldi Health Service Delivery Area: 84.3 (women 86.3, men 82.3)South Vancouver Island Health Service Delivery Area: 82.7 (women 84.9, men 80.5)Central Vancouver Island Health Service Delivery Area: 79.8 (women 82.6, men 77.1)North Vancouver Island Health Service Delivery Area: 79.5 (women 82.3, men 76.9)Northwest Health Service Delivery Area: 77.0 (women 79.2, men 75.0)Northern Interior Health Service Delivery Area: 76.6 (women 79.5, men 74.0)Northeast Health Service Delivery Area: 76.9 (women 79.5, men 74.4)Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet’s region 84.3
Situational vulnerability: residents’ average quintile, 1 least to 5 most deprivedLife expectancy at birth (years)

Set against 102 regions on the deprivation index (correlation −0.83), the region Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet belongs to lives less long than its score of 1.7 predicts: 84.3 years, where the trend gives 85.7. Narrow the field to the 10 regions most like it on deprivation and it still beats 6, with 83.5 years in the middle.

Life expectancy: Statistics Canada table 13-10-0988, 2022/2024, by health region. Deprivation: Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation 2021 (situational vulnerability), averaged over each region’s towns by their residents; income: 2021 Census median household income, averaged the same way. The averages and the line are TownRatings calculations.

Health survey

Self-rated health beats British Columbia: 59% very good or excellent, against 50%

The survey’s answers for the region as given, each beside the province’s (the tick).

Share of adults, as answered · 2023/2024

Health very good or excellent
59%
Health fair or poor
14%
Mental health very good or excellent
55%
Mental health fair or poor
16%
Most days quite a bit stressful
22%
Strong sense of belonging
69%
Satisfied with life
85%
British Columbia

Mental health beats British Columbia as well: 55% very good or excellent to 49%, with 22% facing stressful days.

Canadian Community Health Survey 2023/2024 (Statistics Canada table 13-10-0972), adults 18 and over, as published.

Neighbours

Health in the places around Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet

The places around, with the distance to a hospital and their regions’ figures. Tap a town for its health page.

Pemberton: Health Grade AMount Currie: Health Grade APembertonMount CurrieElectoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet
ABCD
TownHospitalVery good healthLife exp.Health
Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet71 km59%84.3A
Pemberton
1.2 km
73 km59%84.3A
Mount Currie
10 km
66 km59%84.3A

Around Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet the health region doesn’t change, so the only column that moves is the distance to a hospital.

How to read these numbers

What this data can and can’t tell you

  • Adjusted for age. Self-rated health, chronic conditions and smoking enter the grade adjusted to Canada’s adult age mix, though the survey block prints them as people answered.
  • Distances are straight lines. They run from where residents live, not along roads, so they understate a drive; each dissemination area counts by its 2021 population.
  • Who the survey asks. The health survey leaves out people living on reserves, full-time Canadian Forces members, people in institutions, and Nunavik and the Cree lands of James Bay.
  • What counts as a hospital. The facilities database merges provincial lists of different vintages; its hospitals include some with no emergency department, and a few are placed by postal code.
  • Regional figures. Every place in the health region carries the same survey and life-expectancy figures; what is measured for Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet itself is the trip to care.
  • Deprivation is context. Statistics Canada’s 2021 deprivation index describes the town’s own areas for context only, with no index for the territories.

Questions about health in Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet

How far is Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet from a hospital?

Residents of Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet have a clinic 37 km away on average and a pharmacy 18 km away, in straight lines.

How is Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet’s Health Grade worked out?

Not yet: Health will weigh the region’s survey and life expectancy and Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet’s distance to a hospital against the typical Canadian town once Canada’s grading run happens.

How healthy is Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet?

The region beats the typical Canadian town on each of its four survey and life-expectancy figures. The three chronic conditions the grade counts average 12% of adults.

What is the life expectancy in Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet?

Life expectancy comes by health region: 86.3 for women, 82.3 for men around Electoral Area C, Squamish-Lillooet (2022/2024).

Sources: Statistics Canada, Canadian Community Health Survey 2023/2024 (13-10-0972) · Statistics Canada, life expectancy 2022/2024 (13-10-0988) · Statistics Canada, health regions 2023 (82-402-X) · Statistics Canada, Open Database of Healthcare Facilities · pharmacies © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Statistics Canada, Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation 2021. Under the Statistics Canada Open Licence.

Adapted from Statistics Canada (Census of Population 2021, population estimates 2025, 2021 census boundaries) under the Statistics Canada Open Licence; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood names in some cities © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).