Guest, Sign inJoin
ISS039-E-9272 - View of EarthPhoto: Earth Science and Remote Sensing Unit , Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center · Public domain
B−Health Grade
Health in Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley · CCHS 2023/2024, Statistics Canada

Lives run shorter around Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley: 80.0 years, 1.5 below the typical Canadian town’s region

In the health survey, 47% of adults in the region rate their health very good or excellent, fewer than British Columbia’s 50%. Closer to home, a hospital is 10 km from the average resident of Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley, further than the usual 3.7 km. Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley grades B− for health.

Very good or excellent health
47%
adults, age-standardised
British Columbia: 50% · Area-wide: very good or excellent health, chronic conditions, smokers and life expectancy, counted over the Fraser East Health Service Delivery Area
Chronic conditions
17%
arthritis, diabetes, high blood pressure: average share
British Columbia: 15%
Smokers
10%
daily or occasional, age-standardised
British Columbia: 8.9%
Life expectancy
80.0
at birth, 2022/2024
women 82.9 · men 77.2
Nearest hospital
10 km
residents’ average, straight line
the typical Canadian town: 3.7 km
What stands out · In brief

What stands out about health in Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley

A long way to hospital

Residents of Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley live much further from a hospital than in the typical Canadian town (10 km from its centre of population), and 0% are more than 30 km away. Getting care ↓

Less upbeat about their health

Even once age is allowed for, 4.3 points fewer adults here call their health very good or excellent than in the typical town’s region (48% as answered). Health survey ↓

From Statistics Canada: the health survey and life expectancy for the health region, the deprivation index for the town; distances from the healthcare facilities database and OpenStreetMap.

Health Grade

Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley grades B− for health

Each input ranked against Canadian towns of 2,500 or more: the region’s four, the town’s distance to a hospital.

Very good or excellent health (47%)Better than 22% of Canadian towns
Chronic conditions (17%)Better than 54% of Canadian towns
Smokers (10%)Better than 90% of Canadian towns
Life expectancy (80.0)Better than 41% of Canadian towns
Distance to a hospital (10 km)Better than 56% of Canadian towns

The region’s four figures and the town’s distance to a hospital are each ranked against Canadian towns of 2,500 or more, then averaged.

How the grade works

Health is graded as a regional score, labelled as such: very good or excellent self-rated health, chronic conditions (arthritis, diabetes and high blood pressure averaged) and smoking from the Canadian Community Health Survey, each age-standardised so an older region isn’t marked down for age alone, and life expectancy at birth, all for the health region. The residents’ average distance to a hospital is the one input measured for the town itself, so towns in one region can still differ.

Getting care

The nearest hospital is 10 km from the average home in Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley

Measured from where the town’s residents live, so this part is Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley’s own, not the region’s.

Hospital
10 km
residents’ average distance
the typical Canadian town: 3.7 km
Clinic
10 km
community health centre or clinic, residents’ average
Pharmacy
10 km
residents’ average distance
0.0 within 3 km of a typical home
More than 30 km from a hospital
0%
share of residents
Emergency
911
police, fire, ambulance; 811 for health advice in most provinces

Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley is further out than the provincial norm of 4.4 km in British Columbia, and than the typical Canadian town at 3.7 km.

Hospitals and clinics: Statistics Canada, Open Database of Healthcare Facilities. Pharmacies: © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL). Straight-line distances from each dissemination area, weighted by its 2021 population.

Health survey

Fewer people rate their health highly here than in British Columbia: 48% to 50%

The survey’s answers for the region as given, each beside the province’s (the tick).

Share of adults, as answered · 2023/2024

Health very good or excellent
48%
Health fair or poor
16%
Mental health very good or excellent
48%
Mental health fair or poor
20%
Most days quite a bit stressful
23%
Strong sense of belonging
64%
Satisfied with life
83%
British Columbia

Mental wellbeing sits at the provincial level, 48% very good or excellent against 49% for British Columbia; stress is a daily matter for 23%.

Canadian Community Health Survey 2023/2024 (Statistics Canada table 13-10-0972), adults 18 and over, as published.

For its deprivation

1.5 fewer years of life than regions as deprived

The comparison runs between 102 health regions, each shared by its towns; Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley’s region’s dot is under the line.

646872768084882345Eastern Urban Zone: 80.2 (women 82.1, men 78.2)Eastern Rural Zone: 78.6 (women 80.8, men 76.4)Central Zone: 79.0 (women 80.5, men 77.4)Western Zone: 78.5 (women 81.1, men 76.0)Labrador-Grenfell Zone: 77.1 (women 79.2, men 74.6)Prince Edward Island: 81.2 (women 83.3, men 79.1)Zone 1 - Western: 80.0 (women 82.5, men 77.6)Zone 2 - Northern: 79.3 (women 81.5, men 77.1)Zone 3 - Eastern: 78.8 (women 80.9, men 76.6)Zone 4 - Central: 81.4 (women 83.4, men 79.3)Zone 1 (Moncton area): 81.5 (women 83.5, men 79.5)Zone 2 (Saint John area): 79.3 (women 81.1, men 77.3)Zone 3 (Fredericton area): 80.1 (women 81.9, men 78.2)Zone 4 (Edmundston area): 79.1 (women 80.7, men 77.3)Zone 5 (Campbellton area): 79.0 (women 82.3, men 75.3)Zone 6 (Bathurst area): 80.2 (women 82.7, men 77.8)Zone 7 (Miramichi area): 78.9 (women 82.0, men 75.7)Région du Bas-Saint-Laurent: 81.7 (women 83.1, men 80.3)Région du Saguenay—Lac-Saint-Jean: 81.8 (women 83.2, men 80.4)Région de la Capitale-Nationale: 82.9 (women 84.7, men 81.1)Région de la Mauricie et du Centre-du-Québec: 81.6 (women 83.3, men 79.9)Région de l'Estrie: 82.9 (women 84.8, men 81.0)Région de Montréal: 83.4 (women 85.5, men 81.2)Région de l'Outaouais: 80.7 (women 82.2, men 79.1)Région de l'Abitibi-Témiscamingue: 79.5 (women 81.6, men 77.6)Région de la Côte-Nord: 79.4 (women 82.1, men 77.0)Région du Nord-du-Québec: 78.1 (women 78.5, men 77.6)Région de la Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine: 79.9 (women 81.6, men 78.2)Région de la Chaudière-Appalaches: 82.8 (women 84.4, men 81.3)Région de Laval: 84.1 (women 85.7, men 82.4)Région de Lanaudière: 82.0 (women 83.7, men 80.3)Région des Laurentides: 82.2 (women 83.7, men 80.8)Région de la Montérégie: 82.5 (women 84.2, men 80.8)Région du Nunavik: 65.2 (women 70.3, men 60.7)Région des Terres-Cries-de-la-Baie-James: 76.8 (women 79.1, men 73.1)The District of Algoma Health Unit: 77.9 (women 80.4, men 75.6)Brant County Health Unit: 80.4 (women 82.6, men 78.2)Durham Regional Health Unit: 82.6 (women 84.7, men 80.5)Grey Bruce Health Unit: 81.3 (women 83.6, men 78.9)Haldimand-Norfolk Health Unit: 79.6 (women 81.9, men 77.6)Haliburton, Kawartha, Pine Ridge District Health Unit: 81.0 (women 83.0, men 79.0)Halton Regional Health Unit: 84.9 (women 86.5, men 83.2)City of Hamilton Health Unit: 81.2 (women 83.5, men 79.0)Hastings and Prince Edward Counties Health Unit: 79.8 (women 81.8, men 77.8)Chatham-Kent Health Unit: 78.6 (women 80.8, men 76.3)Kingston, Frontenac and Lennox and Addington Health Unit: 81.8 (women 83.9, men 79.5)Lambton Health Unit: 80.0 (women 82.2, men 77.8)Leeds, Grenville and Lanark District Health Unit: 81.2 (women 83.3, men 79.2)Middlesex-London Health Unit: 81.9 (women 84.2, men 79.6)Niagara Regional Area Health Unit: 81.2 (women 83.6, men 78.8)North Bay Parry Sound District Health Unit: 80.0 (women 82.6, men 77.6)Northwestern Health Unit: 73.7 (women 75.2, men 72.3)Huron Perth Health Unit: 81.7 (women 83.7, men 79.7)City of Ottawa Health Unit: 83.7 (women 85.7, men 81.6)Peel Regional Health Unit: 85.3 (women 87.2, men 83.3)Peterborough County—City Health Unit: 80.5 (women 82.8, men 78.1)Porcupine Health Unit: 77.3 (women 80.1, men 74.6)Renfrew County and District Health Unit: 81.0 (women 83.0, men 78.7)The Eastern Ontario Health Unit: 81.0 (women 83.0, men 78.9)Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit: 81.5 (women 83.5, men 79.5)Sudbury and District Health Unit: 79.1 (women 82.0, men 76.3)Thunder Bay District Health Unit: 76.5 (women 79.0, men 74.1)Timiskaming Health Unit: 77.0 (women 80.3, men 73.6)Waterloo Health Unit: 82.8 (women 84.9, men 80.7)Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Health Unit: 82.4 (women 84.5, men 80.2)Windsor-Essex County Health Unit: 81.3 (women 83.5, men 79.2)York Regional Health Unit: 86.3 (women 87.9, men 84.6)Oxford Elgin St. Thomas Health Unit: 80.6 (women 83.0, men 78.2)City of Toronto Health Unit: 84.7 (women 87.2, men 82.0)Winnipeg-Churchill Health Region: 80.0 (women 82.5, men 77.5)Prairie Mountain Health Region: 78.8 (women 81.2, men 76.6)Interlake-Eastern Health Region: 78.5 (women 81.3, men 76.0)Northern Health Region: 68.5 (women 70.5, men 66.9)Southern Health Region: 80.7 (women 82.9, men 78.7)Far North: 70.0 (women 72.8, men 67.3)North Central West: 76.6 (women 79.8, men 73.7)North Central East: 77.0 (women 79.6, men 74.5)Saskatoon: 81.4 (women 83.4, men 79.2)South West: 79.9 (women 82.5, men 77.5)South East: 78.6 (women 80.8, men 76.5)Regina: 80.2 (women 82.3, men 78.0)South Zone: 78.7 (women 80.6, men 76.8)Calgary Zone: 83.0 (women 85.0, men 80.9)Central Zone: 79.1 (women 81.7, men 76.6)Edmonton Zone: 81.2 (women 83.6, men 78.8)North Zone: 78.3 (women 80.9, men 76.1)East Kootenay Health Service Delivery Area: 80.5 (women 82.7, men 78.1)Kootenay-Boundary Health Service Delivery Area: 79.5 (women 82.8, men 76.5)Okanagan Health Service Delivery Area: 81.0 (women 84.1, men 78.2)Thompson/Cariboo Health Service Delivery Area: 78.8 (women 81.8, men 76.0)Fraser East Health Service Delivery Area: 80.0 (women 82.9, men 77.2)Fraser North Health Service Delivery Area: 84.4 (women 86.6, men 82.1)Fraser South Health Service Delivery Area: 83.2 (women 85.8, men 80.7)Richmond Health Service Delivery Area: 86.8 (women 89.0, men 84.4)Vancouver Health Service Delivery Area: 83.3 (women 86.5, men 80.2)North Shore/Coast Garibaldi Health Service Delivery Area: 84.3 (women 86.3, men 82.3)South Vancouver Island Health Service Delivery Area: 82.7 (women 84.9, men 80.5)Central Vancouver Island Health Service Delivery Area: 79.8 (women 82.6, men 77.1)North Vancouver Island Health Service Delivery Area: 79.5 (women 82.3, men 76.9)Northwest Health Service Delivery Area: 77.0 (women 79.2, men 75.0)Northern Interior Health Service Delivery Area: 76.6 (women 79.5, men 74.0)Northeast Health Service Delivery Area: 76.9 (women 79.5, men 74.4)Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley’s region 80.0
Situational vulnerability: residents’ average quintile, 1 least to 5 most deprivedLife expectancy at birth (years)

The trend through 102 regions (correlation −0.83) gives a region scored 2.8 about 81.5 years of life. Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley’s region falls short of it, at 80.0. Set beside its 10 nearest neighbours on the index, it trails the majority, 9 of 10; their median is 81.2 years. Judged by income, around $88,000 a household, the region would look well placed, but income tracks life expectancy only weakly between regions (0.14), and this one lives less long than most.

Life expectancy: Statistics Canada table 13-10-0988, 2022/2024, by health region. Deprivation: Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation 2021 (situational vulnerability), averaged over each region’s towns by their residents; income: 2021 Census median household income, averaged the same way. The averages and the line are TownRatings calculations.

Conditions and habits

19% of the region’s adults have high blood pressure and 8.9% diabetes

Long-term conditions and habits as the region’s adults reported them; the tick marks the province.

Conditions and weight · 2023/2024

High blood pressure
19%
Arthritis
22%
Diabetes
8.9%
Obese (self-reported)
35%
Mood disorder
17%
Anxiety disorder
15%

Habits · 2023/2024

Smoke daily or now and then
10%
Smoke every day
7.6%
Heavy drinking
17%
British Columbia

Obesity runs higher than in the province, at 35% of adults against 25% for British Columbia.

Canadian Community Health Survey 2023/2024 (table 13-10-0972), as published, not adjusted for age; obesity from reported height and weight. The anxiety disorder figure is the 2021/2022 estimate: Statistics Canada found the latest too unreliable to publish here.

The wider area

How the 16 health regions in British Columbia compare on life expectancy

Regional life expectancy in British Columbia, then the town’s place on the national deprivation index.

80.0
years at birth, 2022/2024
20.4
more years expected at 65
9th
longest of 16 regions in British Columbia

Life expectancy at birth by health region · 2022/2024

Richmond Health Service Delivery Area86.8
Fraser North Health Service Delivery Area84.4
North Shore/Coast Garibaldi Health Service Delivery Area84.3
Vancouver Health Service Delivery Area83.3
Fraser South Health Service Delivery Area83.2
South Vancouver Island Health Service Delivery Area82.7
Okanagan Health Service Delivery Area81.0
East Kootenay Health Service Delivery Area80.5
Fraser East Health Service Delivery Area80.0
Central Vancouver Island Health Service Delivery Area79.8
Kootenay-Boundary Health Service Delivery Area79.5
North Vancouver Island Health Service Delivery Area79.5
Thompson/Cariboo Health Service Delivery Area78.8
Northwest Health Service Delivery Area77.0
Northeast Health Service Delivery Area76.9
Northern Interior Health Service Delivery Area76.6

Among the 16 regions in British Columbia, from 76.6 to 86.8 years, this one is 9th.

Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation · national quintile, 1 least to 5 most deprived

Residential instability3.0
Economic dependency5.0
Ethno-cultural composition2.0
Situational vulnerability2.0

Context only: each bar is the residents’ average quintile on one dimension of Statistics Canada’s index, for Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley’s own areas.

Life expectancy: Statistics Canada table 13-10-0988, three-year estimate 2022/2024, by health region.

Neighbours

Health in the places around Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley

The places around, with the distance to a hospital and their regions’ figures. Tap a town for its health page.

ABCD
TownHospitalVery good healthLife exp.Health
Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley10 km47%80.0B−
Chilliwack
13 km
5.1 km47%80.0B
Skowkale
14 km
3.7 km47%80.0B
Harrison Hot Springs
14 km
20 km47%80.0C+
Kent
14 km
15 km47%80.0B−
Tzeachten 13
16 km
6.4 km47%80.0B
Rosedale
17 km
15 km47%80.0B−

Nothing in the regional columns separates Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley from its neighbours; the hospital distance is what does. Residents of Harrison Hot Springs live further from a hospital, at 20 km against 10 km in Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley.

How to read these numbers

What this data can and can’t tell you

  • Who the survey asks. The health survey leaves out people living on reserves, full-time Canadian Forces members, people in institutions, and Nunavik and the Cree lands of James Bay.
  • Regional figures. Statistics Canada reports the survey and life expectancy by health region, not by town: Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley shares them with its neighbours, while the distances are measured for it alone.
  • What counts as a hospital. Facility locations come from Statistics Canada’s open database; records without coordinates sit at their postal code, and not every hospital has an emergency room.
  • Deprivation is context. The Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation (2021) is context, never graded, and the territories have none.
  • Adjusted for age. Because older people report more illness, the grade uses age-standardised shares; the charts above show the unadjusted answers.
  • Distances are straight lines. Each small census area is measured as the crow flies to the nearest facility and weighted by its 2021 residents, so real trips run longer.

Questions about health in Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley

How is Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley’s Health Grade worked out?

No letter yet for Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley: Canada is graded in one run, and Health will then compare its region and its access to care with the typical Canadian town.

How healthy is Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley?

Taken together the region leans less healthy than the typical Canadian town, but the picture is mixed. On arthritis, diabetes and high blood pressure, the region’s average share is 17%.

What is the life expectancy in Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley?

Women in Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley’s region live to 82.9 on average and men to 77.2, Statistics Canada’s 2022/2024 estimate.

How far is Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley from a hospital?

Beyond the hospital, the average home in Electoral Area C, Fraser Valley is 10 km from a clinic and 10 km from a pharmacy.

Sources: Statistics Canada, Canadian Community Health Survey 2023/2024 (13-10-0972) · Statistics Canada, life expectancy 2022/2024 (13-10-0988) · Statistics Canada, health regions 2023 (82-402-X) · Statistics Canada, Open Database of Healthcare Facilities · pharmacies © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Statistics Canada, Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation 2021. Under the Statistics Canada Open Licence.

Adapted from Statistics Canada (Census of Population 2021, population estimates 2025, 2021 census boundaries) under the Statistics Canada Open Licence; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood names in some cities © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).