Among U.S. towns with similar household incomes, Rolling Hills is healthier than 25%
Rolling Hills differs from California on 26 of 32 measures CDC estimates: 22 better, 4 worse.
Modeled estimates for adults 18+, CDC’s own estimate for Rolling Hills. How CDC estimates town health
What stands out about health in Rolling Hills
Cancer and arthritis run high in Rolling Hills
1 in 9 adults have had cancer (11.3%), vs 6.4% across California. 1 in 4 adults have arthritis (25.5%), vs 20.8% across California. In all, Rolling Hills runs above California on three of 11 chronic conditions. Age is part of it: 34% of residents are 65 or older (California 16%), and cancer and arthritis are more common later in life. Conditions ↓
Against towns with similar incomes, Rolling Hills’ lead shrinks
Rolling Hills is healthier than 96% of U.S. towns, but 25% of the 436 towns with similar household incomes ($188K–$313K). Part of its edge is what towns with its incomes tend to have. Health Grade ↓
Rolling Hills keeps up with checkups
It beats California on four of five routine checkups and screenings, including yearly checkups (79.6% vs 71.9%) and dentist visits (78.8% vs 62.8%). Checkups ↓
Rolling Hills is an active town
Only 15.7% of adults get no exercise outside work, vs 24.6% across California. Habits ↓
Written from the CDC, Medicare and HRSA data on this page. CDC PLACES 2025 release: modeled estimates for adults, not counts; “higher” and “lower” mean the California figure falls outside Rolling Hills’ likely range.
What’s behind Rolling Hills’ grade
On seven CDC estimates for adults, Rolling Hills is healthier than 96% of U.S. towns. All seven estimates beat the typical U.S. town. The strongest is obesity (fewer adults with obesity than almost every town); the weakest is diabetes, still better than 74%.
Health estimates follow income closely across the country: towns with higher household incomes usually score higher (a correlation of 0.77 across 21,157 graded towns). Rolling Hills’ median household income is $250,001; among the 436 U.S. towns within 25% of that ($188K–$313K), it’s healthier than 25%, less than its income alone would suggest.
Out of every 100 Rolling Hills adults…
Rolling Hills runs below CA on 3 of 12 conditions and above it on 4. Tap one to see it as people.
Rolling Hills is an older town: 34% of residents are 65 or older, vs 16% across California. Arthritis and cancer rise with age, so higher rates here say as much about who lives in Rolling Hills as about how healthy they are.
Keeping up with care
Share of Rolling Hills adults getting routine care. The full ring is 100%; the dark tick marks California.
Everyday habits, side by side with California
Share of adults, with the California figure marked.
3.3 miles of trails across 2 parks and preserves
Care in and near Rolling Hills
No hospital or community health center in Rolling Hills itself. These are the nearest.
Hospitals: Medicare overall star ratings, 1–5. Community health centers charge on a sliding scale by income. Distances are straight-line from the center of Rolling Hills; ≈ marks a hospital located by its town, not its street. Shortage areas: HRSA Health Professional Shortage Areas.
How Rolling Hills adults are doing
On 4 of 4 measures, Rolling Hills does better than California.
1 in 3 Rolling Hills adults feel lonely. A hello is a start.
Groups are the easiest way in: a walking group, a book club, your street.
If you or someone you know is struggling, call or text 988, the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline. It’s free, confidential and open 24/7.
Making ends meet
Needs that shape health as much as any doctor visit: food, housing, utilities and a way to get around.
4.5% of Rolling Hills adults receive SNAP (food stamps), compared with 15.6% across California.
Rolling Hills and the towns around it
Rolling Hills’s Health Grade ranks 2nd of 3 graded towns around it.
Nearby towns are shaded from CDC’s estimates for their ZIP codes, or CDC’s own figure for cities and villages.
Health next door
| Town | Health | Obesity | Diabetes | Smoking | Figures from |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rolling Hills | A+ | 18.7% | 10.5% | 5.6% | CDC place |
| Rancho Palos Verdes | A+ | 18.5% | 10.5% | 6% | CDC place |
| Rolling Hills Estates | A+ | 18.3% | 10.5% | 5.9% | CDC place |
Same-state neighbors only, ordered by length of shared border.
Living with a disability
Shown without a better/worse judgment.
of Rolling Hills adults live with a disability (California 30.4%). Walking or climbing stairs is the most common.
Every CDC estimate for Rolling Hills
Share of adults, 40 measures, with CDC’s likely range.
On the 32 measures below that have a better and a worse direction, Rolling Hills is better than California on 22 and worse on 4; on the rest, the California figure falls inside Rolling Hills’ likely range, so we call them about the same. Disability and SNAP are described, not compared as better or worse.
| Adults who… | Rolling Hills | CA | U.S. | vs CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall health | ||||
| Fair or poor health | 13.6%11.8–15.8 | 22.1% | 19.4% | Better |
| Frequent physical distress (physical health not good 14+ days a month) | 10.6%9.4–12.1 | 13.4% | 13% | Better |
| Frequent mental distress (mental health not good 14+ days a month) | 11.4%10.2–12.9 | 16.4% | 15.9% | Better |
| Conditions | ||||
| Obesity | 18.7%16.5–21.1 | 27.8% | 32.9% | Better |
| Diabetes | 10.5%9.3–11.9 | 11.7% | 12% | About the same |
| High blood pressure | 33.2%30.9–35.7 | 30.5% | 34.4% | Worse |
| High cholesterol (adults screened in 5 years) | 42.5%39.9–44.9 | 35.4% | 37.1% | Worse |
| Arthritis | 25.5%23.4–27.8 | 20.8% | 25.3% | Worse |
| Asthma | 8.5%7.6–9.4 | 9.3% | 9.9% | About the same |
| Cancer, other than skin cancer | 11.3%10.3–12.3 | 6.4% | 7.9% | Worse |
| Coronary heart disease | 6.1%5.4–7.1 | 5.6% | 6.4% | About the same |
| COPD | 4.2%3.5–5.1 | 5.1% | 6.3% | About the same |
| Stroke | 3.2%2.7–3.6 | 3.1% | 3.4% | About the same |
| Lost all teeth (ages 65+) | 2.8%2.3–3.4 | 10.6% | 12.3% | Better |
| Habits | ||||
| Smoke cigarettes | 5.6%4.5–7.1 | 10.9% | 11.8% | Better |
| No exercise outside work | 15.7%13.6–18.3 | 24.6% | 24.7% | Better |
| Binge drinking | 13%11.6–14.5 | 15.3% | 15.4% | Better |
| Sleep under 7 hours | 27.7%25.3–30.2 | 35.1% | 36% | Better |
| Checkups and coverage | ||||
| No health insurance (ages 18–64) | 2.6%2.1–3.3 | 10.6% | 11% | Better |
| Checkup in the past year | 79.6%77.6–81.4 | 71.9% | 77.4% | Better |
| Dentist visit in the past year | 78.8%76.9–80.5 | 62.8% | 63.2% | Better |
| Cholesterol check in 5 years | 91.9%90.8–92.9 | 85.4% | 87.1% | Better |
| Taking blood pressure medicine (adults with high blood pressure) | 80%77.7–82.2 | 71.3% | 76.5% | Better |
| Colorectal cancer screening (ages 45–75) | 69.3%66.1–72.1 | 57.5% | 65.5% | Better |
| Mammogram in 2 years (women 50–74) | 80%75.6–83.8 | 75.7% | 76.4% | About the same |
| Mind and connection | ||||
| Ever told they have depression | 17.8%16–19.7 | 20.1% | 20.6% | Better |
| Feel lonely | 34.1%31.5–36.9 | 37.3% | 32.5% | Better |
| Lack social and emotional support | 22.6%20.3–25.1 | 28.6% | 23.6% | Better |
| Everyday needs | ||||
| Worried about having enough food | 5.7%4.7–7.1 | 17.9% | 15% | Better |
| Worried about keeping housing | 5%4.2–6 | 14.9% | 12% | Better |
| Threatened with a utility shut-off | 2.4%2–2.8 | 7.3% | 7.6% | Better |
| Lack reliable transportation | 3.8%3.2–4.4 | 9.3% | 7.9% | Better |
| Received SNAP (food stamps) | 4.5%3.5–5.8 | 15.6% | 11.6% | Lower |
| Disability | ||||
| Any disability | 24.8%22.3–27.7 | 30.4% | 30.1% | Lower |
| Difficulty walking or climbing stairs | 11.4%9.8–13.4 | 13.8% | 13.6% | Lower |
| Difficulty concentrating or remembering | 8.7%7.6–10.2 | 14.6% | 13.9% | Lower |
| Hearing difficulty | 6.8%6–7.7 | 5.9% | 6.7% | Higher |
| Vision difficulty | 3.2%2.8–3.7 | 5.6% | 5.4% | Lower |
| Difficulty doing errands alone | 5.3%4.6–6.4 | 8.1% | 7.9% | Lower |
| Difficulty dressing or bathing | 2.5%2.1–3 | 3.9% | 3.8% | Lower |
Each figure is the share of adults 18+ unless the label says otherwise; small numbers after it are CDC’s likely range (95% interval). “About the same” means the California figure falls inside that range.
Questions about health in Rolling Hills
Is Rolling Hills a healthy place to live?
On seven CDC estimates for adults, Rolling Hills is healthier than 96% of U.S. towns: A+ for health. These are modeled estimates of who lives there, not a measure of local care or habits alone.
What is the obesity rate in Rolling Hills?
CDC estimates 18.7% of adults have obesity, likely between 16.5% and 21.1%, against 27.8% across California and 32.9% nationally.
What hospital is closest to Rolling Hills?
Torrance Memorial Medical Center in Torrance, 4.9 miles in a straight line from Rolling Hills’ center point, is the nearest general hospital with an emergency room; Medicare rates it 5 of 5 stars.
How many people in Rolling Hills have no health insurance?
CDC estimates 2.6% of adults ages 18–64 have no health insurance (likely 2.1–3.3%), against 10.6% across California.
How accurate are these numbers?
They’re modeled estimates: CDC applies national survey answers to each area’s age, sex, race and education mix, so they describe who lives in Rolling Hills more than anything measured there. At the ends of CDC’s ranges the grade could be anywhere from A to A+.
Neighbors talk health
Doctors taking patients, urgent care, staying active in Rolling Hills.
Health estimates: CDC PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, 2025 release. The California figure combines its counties, weighted by adult population. Hospitals and star ratings: Medicare Care Compare (CMS). Health centers and shortage areas: HRSA. The Health Grade is our own summary of CDC’s estimates, not an official rating. Ages: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey. Town boundaries: U.S. Census Bureau. This page isn’t medical advice. In an emergency, call 911.