Guest, Sign inJoin
Aerial View of Campus, with Helen C. White Hall in foreground (14070186173)Madison, the state capital · Photo: college.library · CC BY 2.0
Wisconsin · State report card · 2026

How Wisconsin stacks up

In Wisconsin, none of its neighbors matches it on schools and natural-hazard risk. That leaves it 4th of 51, with an A (94 of 100). It stands out for schools that rank 8th on the Nation’s Report Card and short commutes (22 minutes on average).

Each subject puts the official state figure beside a measure built from our town grades. How this works

A
94/100 overall
4th
of 50 states + D.C.
Schools
strongest subject (A+)
Growth
weakest subject (C+)

Safety

15th of 51

B+72/100 Comfortably on the safe side. Its towns mostly sit mid-table; Waunakee ranks highest, at #84. At 245 violent crimes per 100,000 residents, Wisconsin sits 19th lowest among the states.

The official figure
244.5violent crimes per 100,000 residents, 2025
U.S.: 329.3 · 19th lowest of 50 states + D.C.
LowestHighest

With property crime counted (property + 4 × violent), it places 7th lowest.

Source: FBI Crime Data Explorer, state estimate 2025.

Town by town
15%of residents live in a town in the safest quarter of U.S. towns
15th of 48 states · New Hampshire leads at 42%.
Top quarter 15%Middle half 62%Bottom quarter 23%

Measure: reported crime per resident over the engine’s three crime years (property + 4 × violent), as in our Safety grades. 83 Wisconsin towns of 10,000+ against 3,410 nationally. Covers 93% of residents of Wisconsin’s 10,000+ towns.

Town by town

A mixed picture, town by town

Oregon leads its towns at #128 of 3,410 nationally, with Port Washington and Oconomowoc close behind. Milwaukee, La Crosse and Beloit sit at the high-crime end of the national ranking. Of residents of its 10,000+ towns, 15% live in the safest quarter nationally and 23% in the quarter reporting the most crime.

StateSafest quarterMost-crime quarterSplit
New Hampshire42%0%
Rhode Island37%0%
New Jersey35%20%
Pennsylvania29%37%
Maine29%15%
Wisconsin15%23%
What the town figure leaves out

Towns policed by others

Our town measure uses the crime each local police department reports to the FBI; towns without enough of the last three years are left out. In Wisconsin, 93% of residents of 10,000+ towns are covered. One town, Baraboo, has too few years reported and sits out. In Howard, Bellevue, Pewaukee and twelve other places, county or state police answer the calls, so there is no town figure. Next door, coverage runs from 55% in Illinois to 96% in Iowa.

Schools

3rd of 51

A+96/100 Schools are a standout. Spending ranks 26th; results rank 8th. 35% of students test Proficient on the Nation’s Report Card (8th highest) and 91% graduate on time (3rd highest). No neighbor beats it on schools; Illinois comes closest.

The official figure
35.3%of 4th and 8th graders score Proficient or better on the Nation’s Report Card (2024, math and reading)
U.S.: 31.4% · 8th highest of 50 states + D.C.
HighestLowest

Graduation: 90.5% finish high school on time (class of 2023), 3rd highest. The grade weighs test results and graduation equally.

Per-pupil spending, $16,459 (26th highest), is shown for context and not graded.

Source: NCES, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 2024, public schools; EDFacts graduation rates; Census school finance.

Town by town
31%of residents live in a town whose school districts rank in the national top quarter
8th of 50 states · Massachusetts leads at 39%.
Top quarter 31%Middle half 39%Bottom quarter 30%

Measure: graduation rate and test results, averaged; each district’s state-test proficiency is put on the NAEP yardstick (its result ÷ the state average × the state’s NAEP proficiency) so districts compare across states. 99 Wisconsin towns of 10,000+ against 5,230 nationally.

Cost of living

27th of 51

B−48/100 About average on cost. The typical homeowner pays $3,792 a year in property tax, 22% above the national figure. Its towns beat the statewide figure. Town by town it lands near the middle, with Two Rivers its best at #88 of 5,235.

The official figure
$3,792median property-tax bill on an owner-occupied home
U.S.: $3,119 · 16th highest of 50 states + D.C.
LowestHighest

A typical home costs 3.4 years of median household income, 18th lowest.

Source: Census ACS 2020–24 5-year.

Town by town
32%of residents live in a town in the most affordable quarter of U.S. towns
15th of 50 states · West Virginia leads at 96%.
Top quarter 32%Middle half 58%Bottom quarter 10%

Measure: our cost-of-living score: home value, rent and tax bill against area income, plus the share paying 30%+ for housing. 99 Wisconsin towns of 10,000+ against 5,235 nationally.

Health

23rd of 51

B56/100 A little healthier than average. Compared with 19% nationally, 18% of adults here report fair or poor health. Whitefish Bay leads its towns at #162 nationally; 11% of residents live in top-quarter towns.

The official figure
17.8%of adults say their health is fair or poor
U.S.: 19.4% · 15th lowest of 50 states + D.C.
LowestHighest

Source: CDC PLACES 2025 release (BRFSS model estimates).

Town by town
11%of residents live in a town in the healthiest quarter of U.S. towns
32nd of 50 states · Vermont leads at 69%.
Top quarter 11%Middle half 61%Bottom quarter 28%

Measure: our health score: seven CDC PLACES measures (general, physical and mental health, obesity, diabetes, smoking, inactivity). 97 Wisconsin towns of 10,000+ against 5,218 nationally.

Housing

27th of 51

B−48/100 Owners and renters in typical measure. 68% of homes are lived in by their owners, against 65% nationally (22nd highest). Big places drag it down: Milwaukee and Madison rank in the national bottom quarter.

The official figure
67.8%of homes are lived in by their owners
U.S.: 65.2% · 22nd highest of 50 states + D.C.
HighestLowest

Source: Census ACS 2020–24 5-year.

Town by town
7%of residents live in a town in the top quarter for home ownership
33rd of 50 states · New Jersey leads at 30%.
Top quarter 7%Middle half 52%Bottom quarter 41%

Measure: share of occupied homes that are owner-occupied. 99 Wisconsin towns of 10,000+ against 5,235 nationally.

Natural hazards

4th of 51

A94/100 Low risk with few exceptions. Only Maryland and one other state put more residents in the nation’s lowest-risk quarter of towns. FEMA expects $88 of damage a year for every $100,000 of buildings, about half the national figure (5th lowest). Among its neighbors it does best on hazard risk, with Michigan second.

The official figure
$88expected yearly damage to buildings from natural hazards, per $100,000 of building value
U.S.: $155 · 5th lowest of 50 states + D.C.
LowestHighest

Eight federal major-disaster declarations since 2015, 19th fewest.

Behind the figure: inland flooding 78%, tornado 11%, hail 8% of FEMA’s expected losses.

Source: FEMA National Risk Index v1.20 (Dec. 2025): expected annual building loss over building value, all census tracts; FEMA disaster declarations.

Town by town
74%of residents live in a town in the lowest-risk quarter of U.S. towns
3rd of 50 states · Maryland leads at 98%.
Top quarter 74%Middle half 25%Bottom quarter 1%

Measure: FEMA National Risk Index: expected yearly building loss from 18 natural hazards, as a share of building value. 99 Wisconsin towns of 10,000+ against 5,239 nationally.

Commute

11th of 51

A−80/100 Short commutes with few exceptions. Town after town lands in the national top quarter: 53% of residents live in one. Getting to work takes 22.2 minutes on average (11th shortest).

The official figure
22.2 minaverage one-way commute
U.S.: 26.4 min · 11th shortest of 50 states + D.C.
ShortestLongest

Source: Census ACS 2020–24 5-year.

Town by town
53%of residents live in a town in the shortest-commute quarter of U.S. towns
13th of 50 states · North Dakota leads at 100%.
Top quarter 53%Middle half 47%Bottom quarter <1%

Measure: average one-way commute of the town’s workers. 99 Wisconsin towns of 10,000+ against 5,235 nationally.

Growth

33rd of 51

C+36/100 Growing a little slower than the country. Between 2010 and 2020 it grew 3.6%, the 17th slowest change among the states. Windsor leads its towns at #32 nationally; 18% of residents live in top-quarter towns.

The official figure
+3.6%population change, 2010–2020 censuses
U.S.: +7.4% · 17th slowest of 50 states + D.C.
FastestSlowest

Builders took out permits for 4.3 homes per 1,000 residents in 2025, 26th most.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 and 2020 decennial counts; Census building permits.

Town by town
18%of residents live in a town in the fastest-growing quarter of U.S. towns
30th of 50 states · North Dakota leads at 83%.
Top quarter 18%Middle half 45%Bottom quarter 37%

Measure: population change between the 2010 and 2020 censuses. 94 Wisconsin towns of 10,000+ against 5,079 nationally.

Next door

How Wisconsin compares to its neighbors

Against Michigan, Minnesota, Iowa and Illinois, Wisconsin leads on schools and natural hazards.

WisconsinMichiganMinnesotaIowaIllinois
OverallA 944th of 51B 6419th of 51A+ 963rd of 51A 925th of 51B 6220th of 51
SafetyB+ 7219th official · 15% in top townsB− 5442nd official · 17% in top townsA− 7615th official · 15% in top townsB+ 7017th official · 15% in top townsA− 7821st official · 27% in top towns
SchoolsA+ 968th official · 31% in top townsB− 4641st official · 17% in top townsB+ 6611th official · 15% in top townsB 6424th official · 14% in top townsA− 8416th official · 29% in top towns
Cost of livingB− 4836th official · 32% in top townsB 6031st official · 41% in top townsB− 4634th official · 24% in top townsB+ 6830th official · 64% in top townsC 2846th official · 14% in top towns
HealthB 5615th official · 11% in top townsB− 4632nd official · 21% in top townsA− 826th official · 33% in top townsB 6415th official · 16% in top townsB+ 6825th official · 30% in top towns
HousingB− 4822nd official · 7% in top townsA+ 1003rd official · 28% in top townsA 927th official · 21% in top townsB− 4611th official · 1% in top townsB+ 7430th official · 23% in top towns
Natural hazardsA 945th official · 74% in top townsA 923rd official · 59% in top townsB 6416th official · 13% in top townsB+ 7018th official · 21% in top townsB 5819th official · 12% in top towns
CommuteA− 8011th official · 53% in top townsB− 4822nd official · 27% in top townsB+ 7414th official · 44% in top townsA 908th official · 94% in top townsD 1443rd official · 13% in top towns
GrowthC+ 3635th official · 18% in top townsD 647th official · 10% in top townsB 6020th official · 28% in top townsB− 5229th official · 28% in top townsD− 249th official · 2% in top towns

Each cell: the subject’s grade and score, the state’s rank on the official figure (1st = the better end), and the share of residents of 10,000+ towns living in a nationally top-quarter town. Neighbor names open their report cards.

Method

How this report card works

Two measures, side by side. The left card is the figure a state agency or federal survey publishes for the whole state, ranked against the other 49 states and D.C. The right card is built from our town grades: of everyone living in the state’s towns and cities of 10,000+, the share whose town falls in the national top quarter of 10,000+ towns. A state can do well on one and not the other; that difference is often the story.

Scores and grades. Each subject’s score (0–100) is the state’s standing among the 50 states and D.C.: the two measures’ percentiles averaged, then ranked again, the same method as our town grades. 100 is the best state, 0 the last. Letters use the town-grade scale (A+ from 95, A from 85, A− from 75 … D below 15). The overall score weighs safety 18, cost of living 18, schools 16, health 14, commute 10, housing 8, natural hazards 8, growth 8 (out of 100). D.C., a single city, is left out of the town measure and graded on official figures alone.

What it is not. A state figure averages everyone, so it cannot show whether a state is evenly good or a mix of very good and struggling places. The town measure shows the mix but leaves out towns under 10,000 and towns missing data. Neither says anything about any one neighborhood.

Schools use the Nation’s Report Card because each state’s own tests are set to different bars. Hazards use FEMA’s expected building damage, the same loss rate behind our town hazard grades. Sources are named under each figure. How grades work