Guest, Sign inJoin
DHealth Grade
Health in Wasagamack · CCHS 2023/2024, Statistics Canada

People in Wasagamack’s health region live to 68.5 on average, 13.0 years short of the typical Canadian town

The survey puts the region’s share in very good or excellent health at 40%, behind the 51% for Manitoba. What sets Wasagamack apart within its region is a short trip to hospital, 1.5 km for the average resident (3.7 km typical). Wasagamack is a First Nations reserve: a Health grade is possible, an overall grade and a ranking are not. People on reserves are outside the survey’s sample: the figures here are the surrounding region’s, and don’t describe Wasagamack itself. Health gives Wasagamack a grade of D.

Very good or excellent health
40%
adults, age-standardised
Manitoba: 51% · Area-wide: very good or excellent health, chronic conditions, smokers and life expectancy, counted over the Northern Health Region
Chronic conditions
22%
arthritis, diabetes, high blood pressure: average share
Manitoba: 18%
Smokers
15%
daily or occasional, age-standardised
Manitoba: 12%
Life expectancy
68.5
at birth, 2022/2024
women 70.5 · men 66.9
Nearest hospital
1.5 km
residents’ average, straight line
the typical Canadian town: 3.7 km
What stands out · In brief

What stands out about health in Wasagamack

Life expectancy short of what deprivation predicts

Wasagamack’s region falls short of what its deprivation score of 4.9 predicts: 68.5 years against 74.1. For its deprivation ↓

Fewer people feeling well

Even once age is allowed for, 11.4 points fewer adults here call their health very good or excellent than in the typical town’s region (41% as answered). Health survey ↓

More chronic illness

Arthritis, diabetes and high blood pressure are commoner here than in the typical town’s region, even for its ages: 23% report high blood pressure and 14% diabetes. Conditions and habits ↓

A region that smokes more

The age-standardised smoking rate around Wasagamack is well above the typical town’s; 9.6% of adults are daily smokers. Conditions and habits ↓

Survey and life expectancy: the health region (Statistics Canada). Distances and deprivation: the town’s own areas.

Health Grade

Wasagamack grades D for health

Each input ranked against Canadian towns of 2,500 or more: the region’s four, the town’s distance to a hospital.

Very good or excellent health (40%)Better than 3% of Canadian towns
Chronic conditions (22%)Better than 2% of Canadian towns
Smokers (15%)Better than 26% of Canadian towns
Life expectancy (68.5)Better than 0% of Canadian towns
Distance to a hospital (1.5 km)Better than 89% of Canadian towns

The region’s four figures and the town’s distance to a hospital are each ranked against Canadian towns of 2,500 or more, then averaged.

How the grade works

Health is graded as a regional score, labelled as such: very good or excellent self-rated health, chronic conditions (arthritis, diabetes and high blood pressure averaged) and smoking from the Canadian Community Health Survey, each age-standardised so an older region isn’t marked down for age alone, and life expectancy at birth, all for the health region. The residents’ average distance to a hospital is the one input measured for the town itself, so towns in one region can still differ.

For its deprivation

Shorter lives than deprivation would give: 5.6 years behind the trend

Each dot is a health region, not a town, its figures shared by every town in it; Wasagamack’s region sits below the trend line through 102 regions.

646872768084882345Eastern Urban Zone: 80.2 (women 82.1, men 78.2)Eastern Rural Zone: 78.6 (women 80.8, men 76.4)Central Zone: 79.0 (women 80.5, men 77.4)Western Zone: 78.5 (women 81.1, men 76.0)Labrador-Grenfell Zone: 77.1 (women 79.2, men 74.6)Prince Edward Island: 81.2 (women 83.3, men 79.1)Zone 1 - Western: 80.0 (women 82.5, men 77.6)Zone 2 - Northern: 79.3 (women 81.5, men 77.1)Zone 3 - Eastern: 78.8 (women 80.9, men 76.6)Zone 4 - Central: 81.4 (women 83.4, men 79.3)Zone 1 (Moncton area): 81.5 (women 83.5, men 79.5)Zone 2 (Saint John area): 79.3 (women 81.1, men 77.3)Zone 3 (Fredericton area): 80.1 (women 81.9, men 78.2)Zone 4 (Edmundston area): 79.1 (women 80.7, men 77.3)Zone 5 (Campbellton area): 79.0 (women 82.3, men 75.3)Zone 6 (Bathurst area): 80.2 (women 82.7, men 77.8)Zone 7 (Miramichi area): 78.9 (women 82.0, men 75.7)Région du Bas-Saint-Laurent: 81.7 (women 83.1, men 80.3)Région du Saguenay—Lac-Saint-Jean: 81.8 (women 83.2, men 80.4)Région de la Capitale-Nationale: 82.9 (women 84.7, men 81.1)Région de la Mauricie et du Centre-du-Québec: 81.6 (women 83.3, men 79.9)Région de l'Estrie: 82.9 (women 84.8, men 81.0)Région de Montréal: 83.4 (women 85.5, men 81.2)Région de l'Outaouais: 80.7 (women 82.2, men 79.1)Région de l'Abitibi-Témiscamingue: 79.5 (women 81.6, men 77.6)Région de la Côte-Nord: 79.4 (women 82.1, men 77.0)Région du Nord-du-Québec: 78.1 (women 78.5, men 77.6)Région de la Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine: 79.9 (women 81.6, men 78.2)Région de la Chaudière-Appalaches: 82.8 (women 84.4, men 81.3)Région de Laval: 84.1 (women 85.7, men 82.4)Région de Lanaudière: 82.0 (women 83.7, men 80.3)Région des Laurentides: 82.2 (women 83.7, men 80.8)Région de la Montérégie: 82.5 (women 84.2, men 80.8)Région du Nunavik: 65.2 (women 70.3, men 60.7)Région des Terres-Cries-de-la-Baie-James: 76.8 (women 79.1, men 73.1)The District of Algoma Health Unit: 77.9 (women 80.4, men 75.6)Brant County Health Unit: 80.4 (women 82.6, men 78.2)Durham Regional Health Unit: 82.6 (women 84.7, men 80.5)Grey Bruce Health Unit: 81.3 (women 83.6, men 78.9)Haldimand-Norfolk Health Unit: 79.6 (women 81.9, men 77.6)Haliburton, Kawartha, Pine Ridge District Health Unit: 81.0 (women 83.0, men 79.0)Halton Regional Health Unit: 84.9 (women 86.5, men 83.2)City of Hamilton Health Unit: 81.2 (women 83.5, men 79.0)Hastings and Prince Edward Counties Health Unit: 79.8 (women 81.8, men 77.8)Chatham-Kent Health Unit: 78.6 (women 80.8, men 76.3)Kingston, Frontenac and Lennox and Addington Health Unit: 81.8 (women 83.9, men 79.5)Lambton Health Unit: 80.0 (women 82.2, men 77.8)Leeds, Grenville and Lanark District Health Unit: 81.2 (women 83.3, men 79.2)Middlesex-London Health Unit: 81.9 (women 84.2, men 79.6)Niagara Regional Area Health Unit: 81.2 (women 83.6, men 78.8)North Bay Parry Sound District Health Unit: 80.0 (women 82.6, men 77.6)Northwestern Health Unit: 73.7 (women 75.2, men 72.3)Huron Perth Health Unit: 81.7 (women 83.7, men 79.7)City of Ottawa Health Unit: 83.7 (women 85.7, men 81.6)Peel Regional Health Unit: 85.3 (women 87.2, men 83.3)Peterborough County—City Health Unit: 80.5 (women 82.8, men 78.1)Porcupine Health Unit: 77.3 (women 80.1, men 74.6)Renfrew County and District Health Unit: 81.0 (women 83.0, men 78.7)The Eastern Ontario Health Unit: 81.0 (women 83.0, men 78.9)Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit: 81.5 (women 83.5, men 79.5)Sudbury and District Health Unit: 79.1 (women 82.0, men 76.3)Thunder Bay District Health Unit: 76.5 (women 79.0, men 74.1)Timiskaming Health Unit: 77.0 (women 80.3, men 73.6)Waterloo Health Unit: 82.8 (women 84.9, men 80.7)Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Health Unit: 82.4 (women 84.5, men 80.2)Windsor-Essex County Health Unit: 81.3 (women 83.5, men 79.2)York Regional Health Unit: 86.3 (women 87.9, men 84.6)Oxford Elgin St. Thomas Health Unit: 80.6 (women 83.0, men 78.2)City of Toronto Health Unit: 84.7 (women 87.2, men 82.0)Winnipeg-Churchill Health Region: 80.0 (women 82.5, men 77.5)Prairie Mountain Health Region: 78.8 (women 81.2, men 76.6)Interlake-Eastern Health Region: 78.5 (women 81.3, men 76.0)Northern Health Region: 68.5 (women 70.5, men 66.9)Southern Health Region: 80.7 (women 82.9, men 78.7)Far North: 70.0 (women 72.8, men 67.3)North Central West: 76.6 (women 79.8, men 73.7)North Central East: 77.0 (women 79.6, men 74.5)Saskatoon: 81.4 (women 83.4, men 79.2)South West: 79.9 (women 82.5, men 77.5)South East: 78.6 (women 80.8, men 76.5)Regina: 80.2 (women 82.3, men 78.0)South Zone: 78.7 (women 80.6, men 76.8)Calgary Zone: 83.0 (women 85.0, men 80.9)Central Zone: 79.1 (women 81.7, men 76.6)Edmonton Zone: 81.2 (women 83.6, men 78.8)North Zone: 78.3 (women 80.9, men 76.1)East Kootenay Health Service Delivery Area: 80.5 (women 82.7, men 78.1)Kootenay-Boundary Health Service Delivery Area: 79.5 (women 82.8, men 76.5)Okanagan Health Service Delivery Area: 81.0 (women 84.1, men 78.2)Thompson/Cariboo Health Service Delivery Area: 78.8 (women 81.8, men 76.0)Fraser East Health Service Delivery Area: 80.0 (women 82.9, men 77.2)Fraser North Health Service Delivery Area: 84.4 (women 86.6, men 82.1)Fraser South Health Service Delivery Area: 83.2 (women 85.8, men 80.7)Richmond Health Service Delivery Area: 86.8 (women 89.0, men 84.4)Vancouver Health Service Delivery Area: 83.3 (women 86.5, men 80.2)North Shore/Coast Garibaldi Health Service Delivery Area: 84.3 (women 86.3, men 82.3)South Vancouver Island Health Service Delivery Area: 82.7 (women 84.9, men 80.5)Central Vancouver Island Health Service Delivery Area: 79.8 (women 82.6, men 77.1)North Vancouver Island Health Service Delivery Area: 79.5 (women 82.3, men 76.9)Northwest Health Service Delivery Area: 77.0 (women 79.2, men 75.0)Northern Interior Health Service Delivery Area: 76.6 (women 79.5, men 74.0)Northeast Health Service Delivery Area: 76.9 (women 79.5, men 74.4)Wasagamack’s region 68.5
Situational vulnerability: residents’ average quintile, 1 least to 5 most deprivedLife expectancy at birth (years)

Where residents average 4.9 on the index, regions tend to reach 74.1 years (correlation −0.83, 102 regions); the one Wasagamack belongs to trails at 68.5. Among the 10 regions closest to it on the index, longer lives win out: 9 of the 10, around a median of 77.2 years.

Life expectancy: Statistics Canada table 13-10-0988, 2022/2024, by health region. Deprivation: Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation 2021 (situational vulnerability), averaged over each region’s towns by their residents; income: 2021 Census median household income, averaged the same way. The averages and the line are TownRatings calculations.

Health survey

Fewer people rate their health highly here than in Manitoba: 41% to 52%

How adults in the health region answered the survey, not adjusted for age; the tick marks the province.

Share of adults, as answered · 2023/2024

Health very good or excellent
41%
Health fair or poor
19%
Mental health very good or excellent
44%
Mental health fair or poor
24%
Most days quite a bit stressful
31%
Strong sense of belonging
60%
Satisfied with life
87%
Manitoba

Mental health looks weaker than in the province: 44% rate it very good or excellent, against 52% in Manitoba, and 31% find most days quite stressful.

Canadian Community Health Survey 2023/2024 (Statistics Canada table 13-10-0972), adults 18 and over, as published.

Conditions and habits

High blood pressure for 23% of adults in the region, diabetes for 14%

What the survey finds on conditions, weight and habits for the region, the province as the tick.

Conditions and weight · 2023/2024

High blood pressure
23%
Arthritis
27%
Diabetes
14%
Obese (self-reported)
64%
Mood disorder
14%
Anxiety disorder
16%

Habits · 2023/2024

Smoke daily or now and then
16%
Smoke every day
9.6%
Heavy drinking
22%
Flu shot in the past year
34%
Manitoba

Obesity runs higher than in the province, at 64% of adults against 36% for Manitoba.

Canadian Community Health Survey 2023/2024 (table 13-10-0972), as published, not adjusted for age; obesity from reported height and weight.

Getting care

The nearest hospital is 1.5 km from the average home in Wasagamack

Straight-line distances from each part of Wasagamack, weighted by who lives there.

Hospital
1.5 km
residents’ average distance
the typical Canadian town: 3.7 km
Clinic
234 km
community health centre or clinic, residents’ average
Pharmacy
329 km
residents’ average distance
0.0 within 3 km of a typical home
More than 30 km from a hospital
0%
share of residents
Emergency
911
police, fire, ambulance; 811 for health advice in most provinces

Compared with 3.1 km for the typical town in Manitoba and 3.7 km for the typical Canadian town, Wasagamack is on the near side. The clinic list is thin in Manitoba: the facilities database holds few clinics there, so the clinic distance overstates the trip.

Hospitals and clinics: Statistics Canada, Open Database of Healthcare Facilities. Pharmacies: © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL). Straight-line distances from each dissemination area, weighted by its 2021 population.

The wider area

Life expectancy across the 5 health regions in Manitoba

What Statistics Canada publishes above the town: life expectancy for each health region in Manitoba, and the deprivation index for the town’s own areas.

68.5
years at birth, 2022/2024
16.5
more years expected at 65
5th
longest of 5 regions in Manitoba

Life expectancy at birth by health region · 2022/2024

Southern Health Region80.7
Winnipeg-Churchill Health Region80.0
Prairie Mountain Health Region78.8
Interlake-Eastern Health Region78.5
Northern Health Region68.5

No region of the 5 in Manitoba has shorter lives than this one; the longest-lived reaches 80.7, a gap of 12.2 years.

Life expectancy: Statistics Canada table 13-10-0988, three-year estimate 2022/2024, by health region.

Neighbours

Health in the places around Wasagamack

Nearby places: distance to a hospital and each one’s regional figures. Tap a town for its health page.

St. Theresa Point: Health Grade DSt. Theresa PointWasagamack
ABCD
TownHospitalVery good healthLife exp.Health
Wasagamack1.5 km40%68.5D
St. Theresa Point
16 km
6.8 km40%68.5D

The table’s survey and life-expectancy columns are one region’s, Wasagamack’s; read across for the hospital trip. Residents of St. Theresa Point live further from a hospital, at 6.8 km against 1.5 km in Wasagamack.

How to read these numbers

What this data can and can’t tell you

  • Regional figures. The survey figures and life expectancy are published for the health region, so every town in it shares them and only the distances are Wasagamack’s own.
  • What counts as a hospital. Facility locations come from Statistics Canada’s open database; records without coordinates sit at their postal code, and not every hospital has an emergency room.
  • Adjusted for age. Self-rated health, chronic conditions and smoking enter the grade adjusted to Canada’s adult age mix, though the survey block prints them as people answered.
  • Distances are straight lines. Each small census area is measured as the crow flies to the nearest facility and weighted by its 2021 residents, so real trips run longer.

Questions about health in Wasagamack

How healthy is Wasagamack?

On every regional measure, the region does worse than the typical Canadian town. The three chronic conditions the grade counts average 22% of adults.

What is the life expectancy in Wasagamack?

Statistics Canada publishes it for Wasagamack’s health region only: 70.5 years for women and 66.9 for men (2022/2024).

How is Wasagamack’s Health Grade worked out?

Canada’s grades haven’t been set, so Wasagamack has none yet; when they are, Health will set its region and its hospital distance against the typical Canadian town. As a First Nations reserve it gets no overall grade, and the survey doesn’t interview people on reserves, so the regional figures don’t describe it.

How far is Wasagamack from a hospital?

A pharmacy is 329 km from the average resident of Wasagamack, as the crow flies; clinic lists here are too thin to measure.

Sources: Statistics Canada, Canadian Community Health Survey 2023/2024 (13-10-0972) · Statistics Canada, life expectancy 2022/2024 (13-10-0988) · Statistics Canada, health regions 2023 (82-402-X) · Statistics Canada, Open Database of Healthcare Facilities · pharmacies © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL). Under the Statistics Canada Open Licence.

Adapted from Statistics Canada (Census of Population 2021, population estimates 2025, 2021 census boundaries) under the Statistics Canada Open Licence; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood names in some cities © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).