Guest, Sign inJoin
2008-10-30 Ekota 2Photo: Johntwrl · CC BY-SA 3.0
A+Hazard risk Grade
Hazards in Ekota · NRCan, Health Canada, CWFIS

Hazard risk in Ekota is lower than in 98% of Canadian towns

The burned-area map is nearly blank around Ekota, 0% within 25 km since 1986, 0.000% a year. Shaking is less of a worry than in most places, at $0.013 a year per $1,000 of building value ($0.030 typical). In Health Canada’s survey, just 1.4% of homes tested in the area exceeded 200 Bq/m³ (6.6% typical). Hazard risk gives Ekota a grade of A+; its wildfire band pulls it down.

In brief

What stands out about Ekota’s hazards

Four national sources, each read for Ekota: earthquakes, radon, past fires and flood studies.

By hazard

What Ekota faces

Each hazard against its own yardstick; meters run from low to high on that yardstick.

Not on this page: flood zones and homes in them, past floods, landslides, industrial sites and storm surge: Canada has no national open source for them by town.
Hazard risk Grade

Hazard risk in Ekota: A+

Seismic risk and radon set Ekota’s grade, wildfire can drag it down, and flood mapping stays out of it.

Earthquake risk ($0.013)Better than 73% of Canadian towns
Radon (1.4%)Better than 90% of Canadian towns
Wildfire (one-sided) (Low)Better than 81% of Canadian towns · counted against it
Flood study (None listed)Shown, never graded

Its place: #11 of 474 in Alberta and #22 of 2,589 Canadian towns.

How sure: The seismic figure is a long-run average from NRCan’s model, not a prediction. The radon share rests on 73 home tests in the survey area, so a few homes move it. Small fires and grass fires are largely missing from the national burned-area record.

Wildfire

Little of the land around Ekota has burned: 0% within 5 km, 0% within 25 km since 1986

Past fire around Ekota’s homes, from the national burned-area record, with the fuel within 5 km.

0.000%
of land within 25 km burned a year
–
last burn within 25 km

In a typical year 0.000% of the land near Ekota burns; the typical Canadian town sees 0.000%, and both are low.

Land within 5 and 25 km of Ekota’s homes
Burned, 5 km0%
Burned, 25 km0%
Forest, 5 km0.1%
Forest, 25 km0.3%
Grass, 5 km5.3%

Around Ekota the forest is thin or far off: 0.1% of the land within 5 km and 0.3% within 25 km is forest fuel.

Shares of land within 5 and 25 km of populated blocks: burned at least once in 1986–2025 (CWFIS burned-area composite), forest fuel and grass (fire behaviour fuel types, 2026, 250 m grid).

Burn rate a year, towns in Alberta · highest of 478

Wainwright1.43%
Fort McMurray1.11%
Slave Lake0.89%
Lesser Slave River No. 1240.67%
High Level0.66%
Jasper0.50%
Wainwright No. 610.46%
Ekota0.000%

Wainwright has the highest burn rate in Alberta, 1.43% a year; around Ekota, as around 386 of the 478 towns, it rounds to zero.

Each bar: the yearly average share of land within 25 km of a town’s homes that burned, 1986–2025 (CWFIS); the seven highest towns of 2,500 people or more.

Canada’s 2,610 towns by wildfire band
92%LowEkota
5.4%Moderate
1.9%High
0.2%Very high

Measured against 2,610 towns, Ekota is in the largest group, low (92%), and at its floor, while 7.5% rank higher.

Bands of the yearly burn rate: low under 0.05%, moderate under 0.25%, high under 1%, very high 1% or more; towns of 2,500 people or more.

Fire danger and active fires (CWFIS)

Canadian Wildland Fire Information System: National Burned Area Composite 1986–2025 and fire behaviour fuel types (2026), Natural Resources Canada. Measured within 25 km and 5 km of each populated dissemination area; past fire, not a forecast.

Flood studies

The flood map inventory lists nothing for Ekota

What Canada’s Flood Map Inventory lists for Ekota: who studied flooding and where to see their maps.

There is no study for Ekota on the national flood inventory, which is far from complete.

Towns with a flood study on file

Alta.46%
Canada58%

Ekota has no flood study on file; only 46% of towns in Alberta do, against 58% across Canada.

NRCan Canada Flood Map Inventory: a study footprint touching the town’s boundary; towns of 2,500 people or more.

Listed, not scored: a flood study proves a map exists, not that Ekota floods.

The inventory’s own caution (NRCan): “The Canada Flood Map (CFM) does not include every flood hazard map in Canada and may be incomplete or contain inaccuracies. It should not be relied upon as the official source of flood mapping information. Furthermore, if a map appears to be missing, this does not necessarily mean that the area has never been mapped. For the official version of a map, updated information, or confirmation of applicable regulations, please contact the local authority responsible for flood mapping.”

Earthquakes

Little shaking expected in Ekota: $0.013 a year per $1,000

Expected yearly building losses from earthquakes, from Natural Resources Canada’s model.

$0.013
a year per $1,000 of building value
$2.3M
expected building losses a year, all told

Shaking costs the typical town $0.030 a year; in Ekota it is only $0.013, 0.4 times as much.

Shaking damage a year per $1,000 of building value

Black Diamond$0.048
Median, Canada$0.030
Ekota$0.013
Median, Alta.$0.013

Earthquake risk around Ekota ($0.013) matches the middle in Alberta ($0.013), far from Black Diamond’s $0.048.

NRCan seismic risk model (2022): mean yearly building loss per $1,000 of value; medians of towns of 2,500 people or more.

Canada’s 2,611 towns by shaking damage a year
14%under $0.01
21%$0.01+Ekota
15%$0.02+
20%$0.03+
4.9%$0.05+
20%$0.10+
5.4%$0.25+
0.8%$0.60+

Earthquakes cost less around Ekota than in 75% of Canada’s 2,611 towns.

Each column: the share of Canada’s towns of 2,500 people or more in that range of yearly loss per $1,000 (NRCan, 2022).

The loss is to Ekota’s buildings alone, from ground shaking; infrastructure and secondary hazards are left out.

Earthquakes Canada

Natural Resources Canada, Canada’s Seismic Risk Model (2022), by census subdivision (2016 boundaries; a few 2021 subdivisions take their residents’ mean). · Earthquake risk published for the city of Edmonton, not by town

Radon

1.4% of homes tested around Ekota are over the radon guideline

Long-term radon tests in homes across the survey area, against Health Canada’s guideline. · Radon tests for the Capital Health

81 Bq/m³
median test
73
homes tested

At 1.4% over the guideline, the area around Ekota is under the typical Canadian town’s 6.6%.

Tested homes over 200 Bq/m³

Ekota1.4%
Median, Alta.7.5%
Median, Canada6.6%

Over 600 Bq/m³

Ekota0%
Median, Alta.0%
Median, Canada0%

Ekota’s area, at 1.4%, is below the median in Alberta (7.5%).

Health Canada radon survey (2009–2011), by 2007 health region; medians of towns of 2,500 people or more.

Canada’s 2,611 towns by share of tests over 200 Bq/m³
Under 5% · Ekota37%
5–10%37%
10–20%22%
20–30%3.1%
30% or more1.5%

Few tests over the guideline: Ekota shares the bottom band with 37% of Canada’s 2,611 towns, below the other 63%.

Each bar: the share of Canada’s towns of 2,500 people or more whose survey area had that share of tests over 200 Bq/m³.

The survey sampled homes around Ekota; it can’t tell you your basement’s level.

Take Action on Radon

Health Canada, Cross-Canada Survey of Radon Concentrations in Homes (2009–2011).

Warnings

Weather and fire alerts for Ekota

Alerts for Ekota come from Environment and Climate Change Canada and, for emergencies, Alert Ready.

AlertWhat it means
WarningSevere weather is happening or about to: act now.
WatchConditions favour severe weather: be ready.
AdvisoryWeather that is less severe but could disrupt the day.
Special weather statementUnusual weather worth knowing about.
Special air quality statementPoor air, often wildfire smoke.

Alert Ready carries evacuation orders for Ekota to phones; CWFIS shows the day’s fire danger.

Weather alerts (ECCC) · Alert Ready · Fire danger and active fires (CWFIS)

Neighbours

How Ekota’s neighbours compare on hazards

Wildfire band, earthquake risk, radon and flood studies for each place nearby.

MeyonohkSatooKameyosekMeyokuminAnthony Henday South EastSakawMeyonohkSatooKameyosekMeyokuminAnthony Henday South EastSakawEkota
TownWildfireQuake $/1,000RadonFlood study
EkotaLow$0.0131.4%None listed
Meyonohk
2,822 · 0.9 km
Low$0.0131.4%None listed
Satoo
2,517 · 1.0 km
Low$0.0131.4%None listed
Kameyosek
2,761 · 1.1 km
Low$0.0131.4%None listed
Meyokumin
4,069 · 1.2 km
Low$0.0131.4%None listed
Anthony Henday South East
4,960 · 1.3 km
Low$0.0131.4%None listed
Sakaw
3,453 · 1.4 km
Low$0.0131.4%None listed

The neighbour with the most fire is Meyonohk (low), still no more than Ekota (low).

Radon is the survey area’s figure, so neighbours in one area share it.

Be ready

Get ready for what Ekota faces

Practical steps for Ekota’s hazards, most pressing first.

Radon
  • Test for three months in winter.
  • Over 200 Bq/m³: fix it.
  • Kits are cheap; pros test too.
Take Action on Radon
When the river rises
  • Never drive through floodwater.
  • Move papers and medicines upstairs.
  • Ask whether your street is mapped.
Alert Ready
Wildfire season
  • Clear needles and wood nearby.
  • Keep a grab-and-go bag ready.
  • In smoke, stay in; filter air.
FireSmart Canada
Before you buy or rent in Ekota
  • Has it had a radon test?
  • Ask the municipality for flood maps.
  • Are flood and wildfire insured?
How to read these numbers

What this data can and can’t tell you

  • Flood studies aren’t flood zones. A study’s area can be a whole watershed or province, so being on the inventory says a map exists, not that a home in Ekota floods.
  • Wildfire counts one way. Wildfire is read from the national burned-area record around Ekota’s homes since 1986, a history of fire that may lower Risk but never raises it.
  • Radon is a survey. The radon share comes from about 14,000 long-term home tests in 2009–2011, pooled for now by the 2007 health region Ekota sits in.
  • Earthquakes are modelled. NRCan models what earthquakes would cost buildings each year on average, subdivision by subdivision; Ekota’s figure is its subdivision’s.

Get Prepared (Public Safety Canada)

Questions about flooding and hazards in Ekota

Is Ekota at risk of wildfire?

The burned-area record shows next to nothing around Ekota (0% within 25 km since 1986), so its band is low.

How is Ekota’s Hazard risk Grade worked out?

Ekota’s Hazard risk grade is A+, built on earthquakes and radon with a one-sided wildfire input.

Does Ekota flood?

The inventory has 0 studies for Ekota, and an empty list isn’t a clean bill: the municipality holds any flood maps.

Is radon a problem in Ekota?

The area’s survey found 1.4% of 73 tested homes above Health Canada’s guideline, so a three-month test is worth doing in Ekota.

How big is the earthquake risk in Ekota?

NRCan’s model expects shaking to cost buildings in Ekota $0.013 a year for every $1,000 of their value, on average over many years.

Seismic risk: Natural Resources Canada. Radon: Health Canada. Wildfire: Canadian Wildland Fire Information System. Flood studies: Natural Resources Canada, Canada Flood Map Inventory. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence – Canada.

Sources: NRCan, Canada’s Seismic Risk Model 2022 · Health Canada, Cross-Canada Survey of Radon Concentrations in Homes · CWFIS, National Burned Area Composite and FBP fuel types · NRCan, Canada Flood Map Inventory. Under the Statistics Canada Open Licence.

Adapted from Statistics Canada (Census of Population 2021, population estimates 2025, 2021 census boundaries) under the Statistics Canada Open Licence; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood names in some cities © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).