Guest, Sign inJoin
Dunvegan Bridge - panoramio - Grant BergPhoto: Grant Berg · CC BY-SA 3.0
D−Health Grade
Health in Birch Hills County · CCHS 2023/2024, Statistics Canada

For health, Birch Hills County sits behind 97% of Canadian towns

In the health survey, 48% of adults in the region rate their health very good or excellent, fewer than Alberta’s 53%. For Birch Hills County itself, the measure is access: 39 km to the nearest hospital on average, with 100% of homes beyond 30 km. The Health grade for Birch Hills County is D−.

Very good or excellent health
48%
adults, age-standardised
Alberta: 53% · Shared with the rest of the North Zone: very good or excellent health, chronic conditions, smokers and life expectancy
Chronic conditions
21%
arthritis, diabetes, high blood pressure: average share
Alberta: 17%
Smokers
17%
daily or occasional, age-standardised
Alberta: 11%
Life expectancy
78.3
at birth, 2022/2024
women 80.9 · men 76.1
Nearest hospital
39 km
residents’ average, straight line
the typical Canadian town: 3.7 km
What stands out · In brief

What stands out about health in Birch Hills County

Life expectancy below the norm

Life expectancy in the region around Birch Hills County runs 3.2 years behind the typical Canadian town’s, and at 65 people can expect 19.7 more years (2022/2024). The wider area ↓

A long way to hospital

Distance is Birch Hills County’s own health question: 100% of residents live beyond 30 km of a hospital, and the trip from its centre is 37 km. Getting care ↓

A region that smokes more

Smoking is commoner around Birch Hills County than in the typical Canadian town’s region, and 14% of adults smoke every day. Conditions and habits ↓

More chronic illness

High blood pressure (22%) and diabetes (9.9%) push the region’s chronic-condition figure above the typical Canadian town’s. Conditions and habits ↓

From Statistics Canada: the health survey and life expectancy for the health region, the deprivation index for the town; distances from the healthcare facilities database and OpenStreetMap.

Health Grade

Birch Hills County grades D− for health

Each input ranked against Canadian towns of 2,500 or more: the region’s four, the town’s distance to a hospital.

Very good or excellent health (48%)Better than 28% of Canadian towns
Chronic conditions (21%)Better than 10% of Canadian towns
Smokers (17%)Better than 17% of Canadian towns
Life expectancy (78.3)Better than 11% of Canadian towns
Distance to a hospital (39 km)Better than 5% of Canadian towns

The region’s four figures and the town’s distance to a hospital are each ranked against Canadian towns of 2,500 or more, then averaged.

How the grade works

Health is graded as a regional score, labelled as such: very good or excellent self-rated health, chronic conditions (arthritis, diabetes and high blood pressure averaged) and smoking from the Canadian Community Health Survey, each age-standardised so an older region isn’t marked down for age alone, and life expectancy at birth, all for the health region. The residents’ average distance to a hospital is the one input measured for the town itself, so towns in one region can still differ.

The wider area

Longest and shortest lives among the 5 regions in Alberta

Regional life expectancy in Alberta, then the town’s place on the national deprivation index.

78.3
years at birth, 2022/2024
19.7
more years expected at 65
5th
longest of 5 regions in Alberta

Life expectancy at birth by health region · 2022/2024

Calgary Zone83.0
Edmonton Zone81.2
Central Zone79.1
South Zone78.7
North Zone78.3

This is the shortest-lived of the 5 regions in Alberta, 4.7 years behind the first at 83.0.

Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation · national quintile, 1 least to 5 most deprived

Residential instability1.9
Economic dependency3.8
Ethno-cultural composition1.0
Situational vulnerability3.3

The index is context and never graded: it describes Birch Hills County’s own areas, averaged over residents, on each of its four dimensions.

Life expectancy: Statistics Canada table 13-10-0988, three-year estimate 2022/2024, by health region.

Getting care

The nearest hospital is 39 km from the average home in Birch Hills County

Measured from where the town’s residents live, so this part is Birch Hills County’s own, not the region’s.

Hospital
39 km
residents’ average distance
the typical Canadian town: 3.7 km
Clinic
53 km
community health centre or clinic, residents’ average
Pharmacy
41 km
residents’ average distance
0.0 within 3 km of a typical home
More than 30 km from a hospital
100%
share of residents
Emergency
911
police, fire, ambulance; 811 for health advice in most provinces

Compared with 3.1 km for the typical town in Alberta and 3.7 km for the typical Canadian town, Birch Hills County is on the far side. The clinic list is thin in Alberta: the facilities database holds few clinics there, so the clinic distance overstates the trip.

Hospitals and clinics: Statistics Canada, Open Database of Healthcare Facilities. Pharmacies: © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL). Straight-line distances from each dissemination area, weighted by its 2021 population.

Conditions and habits

22% of the region’s adults have high blood pressure and 9.9% diabetes

What the survey finds on conditions, weight and habits for the region, the province as the tick.

Conditions and weight · 2023/2024

High blood pressure
22%
Arthritis
25%
Diabetes
9.9%
Obese (self-reported)
41%
Mood disorder
15%
Anxiety disorder
14%

Habits · 2023/2024

Smoke daily or now and then
17%
Smoke every day
14%
Heavy drinking
25%
Alberta

At 41%, self-reported obesity is above Alberta’s 32%. Heavy drinking is commoner too (25% against 19%).

Canadian Community Health Survey 2023/2024 (table 13-10-0972), as published, not adjusted for age; obesity from reported height and weight. The anxiety disorder figure is the 2021/2022 estimate: Statistics Canada found the latest too unreliable to publish here.

For its deprivation

Level with regions as deprived, give or take a few months

Regions, not towns, with every town in a region sharing its dot: of the 102, the marked one, Birch Hills County’s, follows the trend.

646872768084882345Eastern Urban Zone: 80.2 (women 82.1, men 78.2)Eastern Rural Zone: 78.6 (women 80.8, men 76.4)Central Zone: 79.0 (women 80.5, men 77.4)Western Zone: 78.5 (women 81.1, men 76.0)Labrador-Grenfell Zone: 77.1 (women 79.2, men 74.6)Prince Edward Island: 81.2 (women 83.3, men 79.1)Zone 1 - Western: 80.0 (women 82.5, men 77.6)Zone 2 - Northern: 79.3 (women 81.5, men 77.1)Zone 3 - Eastern: 78.8 (women 80.9, men 76.6)Zone 4 - Central: 81.4 (women 83.4, men 79.3)Zone 1 (Moncton area): 81.5 (women 83.5, men 79.5)Zone 2 (Saint John area): 79.3 (women 81.1, men 77.3)Zone 3 (Fredericton area): 80.1 (women 81.9, men 78.2)Zone 4 (Edmundston area): 79.1 (women 80.7, men 77.3)Zone 5 (Campbellton area): 79.0 (women 82.3, men 75.3)Zone 6 (Bathurst area): 80.2 (women 82.7, men 77.8)Zone 7 (Miramichi area): 78.9 (women 82.0, men 75.7)Région du Bas-Saint-Laurent: 81.7 (women 83.1, men 80.3)Région du Saguenay—Lac-Saint-Jean: 81.8 (women 83.2, men 80.4)Région de la Capitale-Nationale: 82.9 (women 84.7, men 81.1)Région de la Mauricie et du Centre-du-Québec: 81.6 (women 83.3, men 79.9)Région de l'Estrie: 82.9 (women 84.8, men 81.0)Région de Montréal: 83.4 (women 85.5, men 81.2)Région de l'Outaouais: 80.7 (women 82.2, men 79.1)Région de l'Abitibi-Témiscamingue: 79.5 (women 81.6, men 77.6)Région de la Côte-Nord: 79.4 (women 82.1, men 77.0)Région du Nord-du-Québec: 78.1 (women 78.5, men 77.6)Région de la Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine: 79.9 (women 81.6, men 78.2)Région de la Chaudière-Appalaches: 82.8 (women 84.4, men 81.3)Région de Laval: 84.1 (women 85.7, men 82.4)Région de Lanaudière: 82.0 (women 83.7, men 80.3)Région des Laurentides: 82.2 (women 83.7, men 80.8)Région de la Montérégie: 82.5 (women 84.2, men 80.8)Région du Nunavik: 65.2 (women 70.3, men 60.7)Région des Terres-Cries-de-la-Baie-James: 76.8 (women 79.1, men 73.1)The District of Algoma Health Unit: 77.9 (women 80.4, men 75.6)Brant County Health Unit: 80.4 (women 82.6, men 78.2)Durham Regional Health Unit: 82.6 (women 84.7, men 80.5)Grey Bruce Health Unit: 81.3 (women 83.6, men 78.9)Haldimand-Norfolk Health Unit: 79.6 (women 81.9, men 77.6)Haliburton, Kawartha, Pine Ridge District Health Unit: 81.0 (women 83.0, men 79.0)Halton Regional Health Unit: 84.9 (women 86.5, men 83.2)City of Hamilton Health Unit: 81.2 (women 83.5, men 79.0)Hastings and Prince Edward Counties Health Unit: 79.8 (women 81.8, men 77.8)Chatham-Kent Health Unit: 78.6 (women 80.8, men 76.3)Kingston, Frontenac and Lennox and Addington Health Unit: 81.8 (women 83.9, men 79.5)Lambton Health Unit: 80.0 (women 82.2, men 77.8)Leeds, Grenville and Lanark District Health Unit: 81.2 (women 83.3, men 79.2)Middlesex-London Health Unit: 81.9 (women 84.2, men 79.6)Niagara Regional Area Health Unit: 81.2 (women 83.6, men 78.8)North Bay Parry Sound District Health Unit: 80.0 (women 82.6, men 77.6)Northwestern Health Unit: 73.7 (women 75.2, men 72.3)Huron Perth Health Unit: 81.7 (women 83.7, men 79.7)City of Ottawa Health Unit: 83.7 (women 85.7, men 81.6)Peel Regional Health Unit: 85.3 (women 87.2, men 83.3)Peterborough County—City Health Unit: 80.5 (women 82.8, men 78.1)Porcupine Health Unit: 77.3 (women 80.1, men 74.6)Renfrew County and District Health Unit: 81.0 (women 83.0, men 78.7)The Eastern Ontario Health Unit: 81.0 (women 83.0, men 78.9)Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit: 81.5 (women 83.5, men 79.5)Sudbury and District Health Unit: 79.1 (women 82.0, men 76.3)Thunder Bay District Health Unit: 76.5 (women 79.0, men 74.1)Timiskaming Health Unit: 77.0 (women 80.3, men 73.6)Waterloo Health Unit: 82.8 (women 84.9, men 80.7)Wellington-Dufferin-Guelph Health Unit: 82.4 (women 84.5, men 80.2)Windsor-Essex County Health Unit: 81.3 (women 83.5, men 79.2)York Regional Health Unit: 86.3 (women 87.9, men 84.6)Oxford Elgin St. Thomas Health Unit: 80.6 (women 83.0, men 78.2)City of Toronto Health Unit: 84.7 (women 87.2, men 82.0)Winnipeg-Churchill Health Region: 80.0 (women 82.5, men 77.5)Prairie Mountain Health Region: 78.8 (women 81.2, men 76.6)Interlake-Eastern Health Region: 78.5 (women 81.3, men 76.0)Northern Health Region: 68.5 (women 70.5, men 66.9)Southern Health Region: 80.7 (women 82.9, men 78.7)Far North: 70.0 (women 72.8, men 67.3)North Central West: 76.6 (women 79.8, men 73.7)North Central East: 77.0 (women 79.6, men 74.5)Saskatoon: 81.4 (women 83.4, men 79.2)South West: 79.9 (women 82.5, men 77.5)South East: 78.6 (women 80.8, men 76.5)Regina: 80.2 (women 82.3, men 78.0)South Zone: 78.7 (women 80.6, men 76.8)Calgary Zone: 83.0 (women 85.0, men 80.9)Central Zone: 79.1 (women 81.7, men 76.6)Edmonton Zone: 81.2 (women 83.6, men 78.8)North Zone: 78.3 (women 80.9, men 76.1)East Kootenay Health Service Delivery Area: 80.5 (women 82.7, men 78.1)Kootenay-Boundary Health Service Delivery Area: 79.5 (women 82.8, men 76.5)Okanagan Health Service Delivery Area: 81.0 (women 84.1, men 78.2)Thompson/Cariboo Health Service Delivery Area: 78.8 (women 81.8, men 76.0)Fraser East Health Service Delivery Area: 80.0 (women 82.9, men 77.2)Fraser North Health Service Delivery Area: 84.4 (women 86.6, men 82.1)Fraser South Health Service Delivery Area: 83.2 (women 85.8, men 80.7)Richmond Health Service Delivery Area: 86.8 (women 89.0, men 84.4)Vancouver Health Service Delivery Area: 83.3 (women 86.5, men 80.2)North Shore/Coast Garibaldi Health Service Delivery Area: 84.3 (women 86.3, men 82.3)South Vancouver Island Health Service Delivery Area: 82.7 (women 84.9, men 80.5)Central Vancouver Island Health Service Delivery Area: 79.8 (women 82.6, men 77.1)North Vancouver Island Health Service Delivery Area: 79.5 (women 82.3, men 76.9)Northwest Health Service Delivery Area: 77.0 (women 79.2, men 75.0)Northern Interior Health Service Delivery Area: 76.6 (women 79.5, men 74.0)Northeast Health Service Delivery Area: 76.9 (women 79.5, men 74.4)Birch Hills County’s region 78.3
Situational vulnerability: residents’ average quintile, 1 least to 5 most deprivedLife expectancy at birth (years)

Deprivation explains most of the gap between regions (correlation −0.83 over 102), and Birch Hills County’s region is a typical case: 78.3 years at a score of 3.7, where the trend says 78.5. The 10 regions scored most like it mostly do better (7 of 10), with a median of 78.9. Income would point the wrong way: households in the region’s towns earn about $112,000, more than in most regions, yet lives here are shorter than in most (across regions, income and life expectancy correlate at just 0.14).

Life expectancy: Statistics Canada table 13-10-0988, 2022/2024, by health region. Deprivation: Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation 2021 (situational vulnerability), averaged over each region’s towns by their residents; income: 2021 Census median household income, averaged the same way. The averages and the line are TownRatings calculations.

Health survey

Fewer people rate their health highly here than in Alberta: 49% to 54%

How adults in the health region answered the survey, not adjusted for age; the tick marks the province.

Share of adults, as answered · 2023/2024

Health very good or excellent
49%
Health fair or poor
17%
Mental health very good or excellent
48%
Mental health fair or poor
17%
Most days quite a bit stressful
24%
Strong sense of belonging
71%
Satisfied with life
83%
Alberta

Mental health trails Alberta: 48% very good or excellent to 52%, with 24% facing stressful days.

Canadian Community Health Survey 2023/2024 (Statistics Canada table 13-10-0972), adults 18 and over, as published.

How to read these numbers

What this data can and can’t tell you

  • Regional figures. The survey figures and life expectancy are published for the health region, so every town in it shares them and only the distances are Birch Hills County’s own.
  • Distances are straight lines. A straight line from each neighbourhood’s centre to the nearest facility, weighted by who lives there, is shorter than any drive.
  • Deprivation is context. None of the four deprivation scores enters the grade; they come from the 2021 index, which skips the territories.
  • Adjusted for age. Standardising for age lets a retirement region and a young one be set side by side; the charts keep the raw answers, the grade the standardised ones.
  • Who the survey asks. The health survey leaves out people living on reserves, full-time Canadian Forces members, people in institutions, and Nunavik and the Cree lands of James Bay.
  • What counts as a hospital. Hospitals and clinics come from Statistics Canada’s facilities database, built from provincial lists of different dates, and a listed hospital may have no emergency department.

Questions about health in Birch Hills County

How far is Birch Hills County from a hospital?

A pharmacy is 41 km from the average resident of Birch Hills County, as the crow flies; clinic lists here are too thin to measure.

What is the life expectancy in Birch Hills County?

Women in Birch Hills County’s region live to 80.9 on average and men to 76.1, Statistics Canada’s 2022/2024 estimate.

How is Birch Hills County’s Health Grade worked out?

Not so far; the grade arrives with Canada’s grading run and will set the region’s figures, plus Birch Hills County’s own distance to care, against the typical Canadian town.

How healthy is Birch Hills County?

The region trails the typical Canadian town on each of its four survey and life-expectancy figures. On arthritis, diabetes and high blood pressure, the region’s average share is 21%.

Sources: Statistics Canada, Canadian Community Health Survey 2023/2024 (13-10-0972) · Statistics Canada, life expectancy 2022/2024 (13-10-0988) · Statistics Canada, health regions 2023 (82-402-X) · Statistics Canada, Open Database of Healthcare Facilities · pharmacies © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Statistics Canada, Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation 2021. Under the Statistics Canada Open Licence.

Adapted from Statistics Canada (Census of Population 2021, population estimates 2025, 2021 census boundaries) under the Statistics Canada Open Licence; this does not constitute an endorsement by Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood names in some cities © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).